These efforts have paid short shrift to the simple and frustrating fact that, while public policy can make people do things, it can not make people do those things well... First, state and
federal policymakers do not run schools; they merely write laws and regulations telling school districts what principals and teachers ought to do.
Not exact matches
Dithering on the part of
policymakers on a cohesive digital strategy by
federal politicians didn't help either, the Internet Association suggests.
If
policymakers had chosen to
do so, the
Federal Reserve could have made such a term reserve draining approach work to help control money market rates in the United States.15
In addition to his public service at NIH, he
did his postdoctoral training within the NIH - NIEHS Superfund Research Program Center at the University of Kentucky, where he directed the Center's graduate and postdoctoral transdisciplinary training efforts and translated the Center's ongoing environmental health - related research innovations to relevant stakeholders, including state and
federal policymakers and regulators, industry partners for technology transfer, and at - risk populations across Kentucky.
Mainstream wisdom among
federal policymakers then was that schools don't make much of a difference in children's lives and that spending money to improve schools was wasteful.
Policymakers should encourage (or push) districts to create similar options for their students by tying Title I and other
federal aid programs to initiatives that promote online learning for the most talented students and that also provide physical locations for these students to
do their advanced group work.
When it comes to something like school improvement, something that's a matter of practice, fidelity of implementation, and on - the - ground commitment, the frustrating fact is that
federal policymakers can't really
do much.
But is it within the competence (not to mention the legal authority) of the
federal government to solve those problems, or will their efforts to
do so simply make things worse for educators, school leaders, and
policymakers in the places that really matter?
Most teachers, principals, and superintendents
do not believe that state and
federal policymakers understand the purpose of different types of assessment, highlighting the need for dialogue around ESSA implementation.
We hope to be talking a lot more with
policymakers, whether it's at the
federal level or at the state level like Lindsey had mentioned, to see what possibilities there might be for any new kinds of programs or policies and really to educate those key stakeholders in terms of learning more about the different types, what education savings accounts
do and how they can be useful for families.
The report defined what a «data literate» educator is and outlines what state and
federal policymakers need to
do to ensure that every teacher is data literate.
The gap between the skills with which students graduate from high school and what colleges expect them to be able to
do has come under increased scrutiny, as
federal policymakers push states to increase college graduation rates.
Where
do Federal Reserve
policymakers stand on recent dynamics?
That means buttressing existing
federal protections at the state level to ensure that anti — family planning activists and
policymakers, including those in the Trump administration,
do not undermine Medicaid, private insurance or family planning grant programs.22, 23,25 And it means expanding on current protections in various ways: For example,
policymakers could address gaps in insurance coverage by requiring Medicaid and private insurance plans to cover vasectomy and condoms, as well as methods obtained without a prescription.