[8][9][10] The metaphor of a nuclear strike refers to the majority party unilaterally imposing a change to
the filibuster rule, which might provoke retaliation by the minority party.
In July 2013, the nuclear option was raised as nominations were being blocked by Senate Republicans as Senate Democrats prepared to push through a change to the chamber's
filibuster rule.
At least 10 Senate Democrats oppose or are leaning against a proposal to overhaul
the filibuster rule by lowering the number to end debate.
There was an order in there titled «To provide for expedited Senate consideration of certain nominations subject to advice and consent», but this did not appear to be the new
filibuster rule.
In recent years, the Senate has operated under
a filibuster rule that 60 votes are needed to end debate and bring an issue to a vote.
Instead of changing the debate (the role that originally brought him to prominence), he has been trying to craft legislation that can pass the Senate while avoiding
the filibuster rule.
Moreover, when the Senate changed
its filibuster rules in 2013, so that judicial nominees were exempt, the change did not extend to Supreme Court nominees.
Unfortunately, it seems the most recent edition is from 1992, and therefore it would not contain, for example, the new
filibuster rules.
The future makeup of the court depends upon imponderables like the outcome of presidential elections and the makeup of the Senate (and
its filibuster rules, as we saw last week).
The U.S. Senate was expected to take up the $ 51 billion federal Sandy recovery package today but ended up putting it off at least for a day while Senate leaders negotiate over changes in
filibuster rules.
In her recent piece, Fillibuster, 2016 she re-enacted Senator Wendy Davis» 11 Hour filibuster against Texas abortion laws in June 2013 adhering to the Texas
filibuster rules which prohibited sitting, leaning, drinking, eating, or restroom breaks.
Not exact matches
Although Paul's
filibuster was technically against Brennan's nomination, his remarks focused primarily on civil liberties issues, offering a scathing critique of the Obama's administration's use of unmanned drones, and refusal to
rule out military strikes against American citizens on U.S. soil.
Scrapping the
filibuster, known in political circles as the «nuclear option,» would require McConnell to wrangle a majority of senators to vote to suspend the
rule.
McConnell has batted down Trump's calls to get rid of the
filibuster and is known as a stickler for Senate
rules.
If the proposal doesn't comply with the Senate's
rules, an ensuing fight could pit conservatives against moderates and institutionalists — and could edge Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R - KY) closer to completely eliminating the legislative
filibuster, a move with far bigger implications than health care policy.
Senate Finance Committee aides said they planned to make adjustments to the legislation because it probably does not comply with the
rules for a special Senate procedure they hope to use to pass the bill with 50 votes, rather than the 60 votes typically needed to beat a
filibuster.
For one, killing the
rule would actually take quite a bit of work and could face the threat of a Democratic
filibuster in the Senate.
to complete the answer to the question, I would add: So, no the
filibuster can not be stopped by silencing the minority unless every member of the minority spoke in a way to violate Senate
Rule XIX
I would also like to add to @sabbahillel's answer that when the Democrats last controlled the Senate, they changed the Senate
rules and eliminated the
filibuster on federal judge appointments to make it easier for the Senate to approve the appointments of the Obama administration.
How have the senate
rules been changed to allow for a
filibuster without continued debate?
In the U.S. Senate, the
filibuster allows a single senator to effectively block a vote by way of the senate
rules that allow for unlimited debate, but now, the senate
rules have somehow been modified so that to invoke
filibuster you don't even need to actually have «debate» where you do silly things like read names from the telephone book to keep the debate going.
Nevertheless, under current Senate
rules, a
rule change could itself be
filibustered, requiring two - thirds of senators who are present and voting to end debate.
Or has the Senate changed the
rules without officially changing the written
rules, like they did with judicial
filibusters?
In the U.S. Senate, the
filibuster allows a single senator to effectively block a vote by way of the senate
rules that allow for unlimited debate, but now, the senate
rules have somehow been modified...
Subsequent revisions to House
rules limited
filibuster privileges in that chamber, but the Senate continues to allow the tactic.
Filibuster and Cloture
Wikipedia says that the
filibuster in the United States Senate is a Senate
rule that allows a senator to talk as long as he does not give up the floor, unless a special vote is taken to stop debate.
There are numerous examples of the Senate being able to circumvent the
rule directly that requires 60 votes to end a
filibuster, and the threat to expand the nuclear option to other areas.
U.S. Senate Republicans deployed the so - called «nuclear option» and changed longstanding
rules to clear the way for the confirmation of Judge Neil Gorsuch to serve on the Supreme Court, bypassing a precedent - breaking Democratic
filibuster by allowing the nomination to go forward on a simple majority vote.
Note that the Democrats forced a
rule change in order to prevent a
filibuster on certain kinds of votes
The Senate agreed and eliminated this option from their
rules, which now made unbreakable
filibusters possible; they didn't actually happen for a few decades.
Trump was referring to the so - called nuclear option, whereby the Senate leader would change the chamber's
rules to prevent Democrats from
filibustering the nominee.
Update:
Rules of enragement: the
filibuster and Senate reform (Grist creates an information center).
In closing, Stewart said he believes Gillibrand will be able to persuade the Senate to change its
rules to abolish the
filibuster.
Gillibrand also reiterated Schumer's warning against using the so - called «nuclear option» to ram Gorsuch's confirmation through — that is, changing Senate
rules to block use of the
filibuster.
She anticipated that the GOP will utilize the so - called «nuclear option» — changing Senate
rules to eliminate the
filibuster — to install him on the bench.
Budget bills are governed under a special
rule process called «Reconciliation» that disallows
filibusters.
Congress also uses modifications of straight Robert's
Rules voting like the
filibuster, holds, Senatorial privilege for judicial appointments, supermajority voting on treaties, «fast track voting» without amendments and similar variants.
Wikipedia says that the
filibuster in the United States Senate is a Senate
rule that allows a senator to talk as long as he does not give up...
Is there any
rule preventing senators from simply walking out of a
filibuster (or taking out a sleeping bag)?
The Senate Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer of New York, argued on Thursday that the core of Mr. MacArthur's amendment would violate the budget
rules that Republicans must follow in order to sidestep a Democratic
filibuster.
Though
rules don't permit a tactic like Murphy's
filibuster, Rep. Jim Himes made waves when he and some Democratic colleagues, including Reps. Joe Courtney and John Larson walked off the floor of the House during a moment of silence for the 49 men and women who were slain in an Orlando nightclub.
In a 51 - 48 vote, the Senate prohibited any motion to waive the
rules after a
filibuster is defeated, [21][22][23] although this change did not affect the ultimate ability of a 41 - vote minority to block final action via an initial
filibuster.
And amid a frosty period in his relationship with Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, Mr. Trump questioned the Senate leader's approach, faulting Republicans for failing to blow up longstanding Senate
rules that make most legislation subject to a
filibuster that requires 60 votes to overcome.
But he pointed hopefully to the power of the 48 - member Senate Democratic Caucus headed by Sen. Charles Schumer, who have enough votes under the current
rules to
filibuster most Republican legislation.
Cloture: The cloture
rule — Rule 22 — is the only formal procedure that Senate rules provide for breaking a filibus
rule —
Rule 22 — is the only formal procedure that Senate rules provide for breaking a filibus
Rule 22 — is the only formal procedure that Senate
rules provide for breaking a
filibuster.
Since
rule changes can be
filibustered the same as any other vote, cloture can be required on them.
But Trump has urged GOP Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to use the so - called «nuclear option» — rewriting the
rules to disallow a
filibuster.
If the GOP / Teatrolls want to agree to
rules that define when
filibusters for nominees will be allowed, instead of just removal of the
filibuster for nominees altogether, I'm pretty sure Reid would negotiate.
WASHINGTON — The Senate approved the most fundamental alteration of its
rules in more than a generation on Thursday, ending the minority party's ability to
filibuster most presidential nominees in response to the partisan gridlock that has plagued Congress for much of the Obama administration.
Republicans reign in both wings of the Capitol, although Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer «s 48 - member Democratic caucus has enough votes
filibuster most legislation under current Senate
rules.