Sentences with phrase «financial disputes represent»

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

So Trump's tax return could tell how much income they made, offering fresh information about the financial health of his organization, according to Robert Kovacev, a lawyer at Steptoe & Johnson and former Justice Department Tax Division official who represents taxpayers in high - profile tax disputes with the IRS.

Mr. Edgarton also represents public and private companies and private equity firms in disputes arising from mergers and acquisitions, financial restructurings and various other commercial transactions.

Counts a number of household names in the financial services, life sciences and industrial sectors among its clients, alongside an active practice representing individuals in civil rights disputes.

Oppenhoff & Partner's broad range of contentious work reflects an equally broad client roster, which includes investment and pharmaceutical companies, financial institutions and service providers, which the team frequently represents in corporate and post-M & A disputes, D&O liability proceedings and claims for damages.

Doug also represents insurers at arbitrations and appeals before the Financial Services Commission of Ontario, the License Appeal Tribunal and at private arbitrations involving loss transfer and priority disputes.

He represents clients in international arbitrations under the rules of all major arbitral institutions, with a particular focus on disputes in the oil and gas, power, construction, financial services and telecommunications sectors.

Chris represents national and local North Carolina business interests in regulatory enforcement disputes, class actions, financial services and lending disputes, software design, development and implementation disputes, corporate governance and shareholder rights disputes, and antitrust and manufacturing disputes.

Jamie is a leading member of our International Arbitration Group, having represented clients in ad hoc proceedings and those brought before SIAC, LCIA, ICC, AAA, JAMS, LMAA and under UNCITRAL rules in disputes predominantly in the energy, oil and gas, infrastructure and financial services sectors, often involving emerging jurisdictions, particularly in South - East Asia, India, Africa and Eastern Europe.

David has extensive experience representing serial entrepreneurs, banking institutions, financial service providers, commercial landlords, and Fortune 20 companies in state and federal courts throughout Florida and beyond in contractual disputes, tort claims, evictions, and commercial foreclosures.

She represents financial institutions in litigation including matters involving creditors» rights, provisional remedies and post-judgment enforcement, fraudulent transfers and disputes relating to secured and unsecured lending.

Masoud represents financial sponsors and creditors and debt and equity investors on a range of disputes and restructurings involving significant corporate and property acquisition finance.

In addition, he represented financial services clients in the arbitration and litigation of complex commercial disputes.

Prior to moving his practice to Texas, he was a senior associate at Willkie, Farr & Gallagher in New York City, where he represented clients in the accounting and financial services industries regarding securities litigation, internal investigations and business disputes.

He regularly represents lenders and financial institutions in a variety of consumer finance litigation matters, including disputes under TILA, RESPA, FCRA, ECOA and FDCPA, state law UDAP claims, and a variety of common law claims.

He also represents defrauded financial institutions in the investigation and recovery process, and has represented a variety of other companies and individuals in complex commercial disputes.

She has represented a broad range of clients, both claimant and defendant, and has particular experience in financial disputes including in relation to Interest Rate Hedging Products.

Mr. Donewald concentrates his practice on consumer financial services litigation, representing financial institutions in state and federal courts in disputes concerning alleged violations of state and federal law.

Accessing consistent effective justice in financial disputes is more demanding than ever before in the fast - moving, complex and cross-border business world and the financial List represents an exceptional new option that will make life easier for Solicitors, the Bar and clients.

He has extensive experience in representing a major media company, financial institutions, brand name pharmaceutical manufacturers, accounting firms, law firms, and a variety of other companies and professionals in federal and state litigation, including in matters involving antitrust law, securities law, corporate governance, pharmaceutical pricing, contract disputes, accountants liability, legal malpractice and communications law.

They might say something like «I represent high technology companies in the acquisition and protection of their assets,» or «I litigate complex disputes, mainly in the financial sector.»

For over 37 years our attorneys have represented clients in a wide variety of litigation matters, including complex contract disputes, securities claims, tortious interference, trade secrets and other business torts, partnership disputes, financial and accounting issues, employment and non-competition claims, intellectual property issues, securities and RICO litigation, and real estate disputes.

Representing financial institutions in commercial litigation matters, including contract disputes, lender liability claims, repurchase litigation, and contract disputes.

More recently, David represents Citi Bank in a dishonest assistance claim litigated in the Financial List of the High Court and acts for RBS in an # 87m VAT fraud dispute concerning the trade in carbon credits.

Peter's broad - based practice involves representing financial institutions, property owners and investors in a wide variety of complex bankruptcy and commercial disputes, many of which involve litigation in multiple jurisdictions.

He also specializes in cases involving intellectual property, trade secrets, unfair business competition and employment related claims, and he has substantial experience in representing financial institutions in lender liability actions, interbank disputes and claims involving directors and officers.

We represent clients in a wide range of corporate disputes and commercial and financial litigation in the Commercial Court, Chancery Division and in international arbitrations and offshore jurisdictions.

Mr. Sherman also founded and managed The Sherman Law Firm, where — for nearly a decade — he represented individuals and institutions in class action opt out litigation arising from the 2008 financial crisis, as well as in severance and other employment - related disputes.

A Martindale - Hubbell AV ® Preeminent ™ Rated attorney, Matthew has extensive trial and appellate experience and regularly represents financial institutions, corporations and individuals in commercial matters, including real estate litigation, landlord / tenant matters, partnership disputes, and other commercial litigation matters.

He acts as counsel, representing investors and states in a large number of disputes under bilateral investment treaties across a variety of sectors, including hydrocarbons, banking and financial services, water, electricity, telecommunications, food distribution, mining and steel industries.

Represented a financial institution as lead participant in connection with a major bankruptcy in which total secured debt exceeded $ 750 million with multiple lending tiers, including warehouse lines, mezzanine lenders, residual lines of credit, and significant priority disputes in both pre - and post-bankruptcy planning and litigation.

«I first met Ms. Mehta when my solicitor recommended she represent me in Court for the Financial Dispute Resolution hearings.

He has frequently represented major money center banks, as well as other financial institutions and major bank customers, in a wide variety of litigation matters and potential litigation, ranging from borrower bankruptcies and workouts to lender liability actions, age discrimination claims, letter of credit disputes and other commercial controversies.

In addition to consumer disputes, we also represent institutions in connection with business to business disputes relating to their financial services activities.

She has recently represented clients in niche insolvency and financial disputes, as well as in litigations regarding payment of entitlements.

Represented foreign - exchange technology development company in federal court investment - and - control dispute with financial partner

While a significant part of his practice is dedicated to defending lawyers, financial advisors and insurance producers against malpractice claims, he also devotes considerable time advising lawyers and law firms on their ethical obligations and risk management tools, acting as outside general counsel to several of Chicago's many condominium associations, and representing the interests of family members and shareholders in disputes that arise within closely - held corporations... read full bio.

Michael Simon represents real estate management companies, owners of office and retail buildings, financial institutions, co-op and condominium boards, and tenants in commercial and residential disputes.

While a significant part of his practice is dedicated to defending lawyers, financial advisors and insurance producers against malpractice claims, he also devotes considerable time advising lawyers and law firms on their ethical obligations and risk management tools, acting as outside general counsel to several of Chicago's many condominium associations, and representing the interests of family members and shareholders in disputes that arise within closely - held corporations.

Matt is a commercial litigator with experience representing corporations and financial institutions in complex multi-jurisdictional and multi-party High Court disputes.

Represented an international financial institution in an UNCITRAL arbitration governed by Czech law with the arbitration seat in London relating to a shareholders» dispute.

Najma has represented seriously injured clients in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, as well as in dispute resolution proceedings before the Financial Services Commission of Ontario.

Aggressively representing companies and states, counties, cities, and other municipalities in cutting - edge, complex commercial, public, and financial disputes.

Our lawyers routinely provide regulatory guidance to banks, broker - dealers, funds, insurance companies, and other financial institutions worldwide; advise on the acquisition and disposition of financial institutions; assist underwriters of securities offerings; counsel financial advisory firms on mergers and acquisitions; represent financial institutions in structured finance transactions and commercial lending; handle complex litigation and international disputes; and efficiently and effectively resolve government investigations and enforcement actions which result from the ever - expanding regulatory environment in the sector.

Morgan Lewis represents many of the largest financial services firms in the United States and around the world, as well as some of the most important investment managers, private investment funds, broker - dealers, corporate trustees, auditors, accounting firms, and insurance companies in all aspects of litigation and dispute resolution.

Meredith S. Dante represents employers across industries including retail, consumer products, hospitality, financial services, technology, life sciences, health care, manufacturing, and higher education in a broad range of labor and employment disputes.

He has represented some of America's largest manufacturing companies and financial institutions in their class action litigation throughout Florida and in Multi-District Litigation throughout the country, he advises companies and their Officers and Directors in company investigations and in corporate governance disputes, he represents businesses in disputes with their insurance carriers, and he has represented manufacturers and distributors in hundreds of toxic tort and products liability cases.

Representing a member of a European banking consortium in a post-acquisition dispute in the financial services sector referred to ICC arbitration in Paris.

The Zurich office has particular expertise in advising and representing clients with regard to: - Litigation and arbitration of complex financial disputes - White collar and corporate investigations - Regulatory investigations - Resolution of M&A disputes The Zurich office lawyers also have extensive dispute resolution experience in the area of pharma and life sciences, commodity trade, international sports and all types of commercial matters as well as international judicial and administrative assistance.

The Group has represented clients in Latin America - related disputes in a wide variety of areas and industries, including internal investigations, construction, infrastructure, project finance, sovereign - granted concessions, energy sector, real estate, intellectual property, antitrust and cartels, hospitality, transportation, technology, and financial and banking matters, among others.