Any november deadline will be uniquely related to
the first order draft, which is a long way from final.
• July 18 - 22: Second Lead Authors Meeting (LA2) • October 24 - 28: WCRP Open Science Conference will include a CMIP5 session (Denver, Colorado) • December 16 — February 10, 2012: Expert Review of
the First Order Draft (FOD)
Jul Second Lead Authors Meeting (LA2), 18 - 22 July 2011, Brest, France Dec Expert Review of
the First Order Draft (FOD), 16 December — 10 February 2012 2012 Feb Expert Review of
the First Order Draft (FOD), 16 December — 10 February 2012 Apr Third Lead Authors Meeting (LA3), 16 - 20 April 2012, Marrakech, Morocco Jul, 31 WGI AR5 literature cut - off for submitted papers, 31 July 2012 Oct - Nov Expert and Government Review of the Second Order Draft (SOD), 5 October — 30 November 2012
In fact, if Renate Christ's description of the IPCC review process, as given to the InterAcademy Council Review were followed the second review stage is only to make sure that the comments on
the the first order draft were properly dealt with.
(The Briffa reconstruction seems to have been very fluid in this period, as the versions in IPCC TAR Zero Order Draft and
First Order Draft appear to be different again and still unaccounted for.)
After
the first order draft has been reviewed by experts, authors prepare a second order draft of the report and a first draft of its Summary for Policymakers (SPM).
A total of 31,422 comments was submitted by 800 experts and 26 governments on the Second Order Draft of the Chapters and
the First Order Draft of the Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summary.
In a recent thread on the blog that you host, Climate Audit, you quote text and a figure directly from the WGI AR5
First Order Draft.
The Expert Review of
the First Order Draft of the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) has started.
The First Order Draft is subject to a formal Expert Review, where any expert is encouraged to comment on all aspects of the draft, including, but not limited to, issues of interpretation, missed literature, and presentation.
The IPCC AR5 stated that the equilibrium climate sensitivity is likely in the range 1.5 °C to 4.5 °C, in
the First Order Draft it stated that «mostly likely value» being 3.0 °C.
And what the authors did in
the First Order Draft was use their lack of satisfaction with this proposed mechanism for how solar activity might be affecting climate as a rationale for ignoring the mountain of evidence that SOME such mechanism is at work.
I have collected a dozen such statements from scientific papers, news articles, and most recently from
the First Order Draft of AR5.
The Third Lead Author meeting will be held in December of 2005 in New Zealand and it will consider comments on
the first order draft and initiate the writing of the second order draft.
In May 2005 the second Lead Author meeting will take place in China to consider comments on the zero order draft and initiate
the first order draft writeup.
The Expert Review of
the First Order Draft of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) will take place from 4 May until 29 June 2018.
During the first review,
First Order Drafts are widely circulated to independent experts all over the world that have significant expertise and / or publications in particular areas of the report, and to experts nominated earlier by governments and participating organizations.
While I could get the IPCC
First Order Drafts, it would be under conditions that restrict my independence, so I plan to continue looking for leaked documents.
Further to my comment to Richard Betts, you might note that our Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) had just refused my request for
the First Order Drafts.
The authors of the WG1 report must submit
their first order drafts around middle November for inclusion in the First Order report that must be ready for expert review by Dec 16.
Not exact matches
President Obama
first signed an executive
order requiring federal contractors to provide paid sick leave last September, and the Labor Department unveiled a
draft of the rule in February, after which it solicited public comments.
The last time three quarterbacks went at the top of the
draft order was in 1999 when Tim Couch, Donovan McNabb, and Akili Smith were the
first three picks, respectively.
In the
first 2018 mock
draft done by SB Nation's Dan Kadar, Darnold, Allen, and Rosen are also the
first three picks, albeit in a different
order.
The criteria used to sift through the clutter, in no particular
order: the potential for offensive fireworks, any intriguing contrast in schematic styles, the presence of a superstar player or future
first - round
draft pick, the prestige of the bowl game and / or venue itself, the TV time slot and the quality of the teams involved.
Records and the SoS tiebreaker are used to determine the
first 20 spots in the
draft order.
They also shipped Cordy Glenn to Cincinnati in
order to move up from the 21st to 12th pick in this year's
draft — a pick that, paired with their 22nd pick, could net a solid QB prospect via trade to the top of the
first round.
New England had the 29th pick in the 2013
draft, but made the extremely Belichick - ian move to slide out of the
first round in
order to pick up second, third, fourth, and seventh - round selections instead.
Last week in this space, we utilized a wealth of prop bets in
order to project the
first sixteen picks in tomorrow's NFL
Draft.
Chances are good he'll go in the
first round, though, the
order of which you can find here — along with the
order for the
draft as a whole.
In
order to determine the
first 14 picks in the
draft, every non-playoff is given an allotment of ping pong balls based on their record during the past season.
The panel charged with redrawing the Albany County political map struck down by a federal judge last week will meet Tuesday for the
first time — two weeks before a court -
ordered deadline to
draft new lines that don't dilute minority voting power.
Under the Government of Wales Act 2006 the
First Minister was required to send a letter within two weeks to the Welsh Secretary (then Peter Hain), who would then have 120 days to lay a
draft order for a referendum before Parliament.
Unsatisfied with Anne's
first draft, the one she wrote after talking to everyone in Harriet's orbit, who all hate her, Harriet takes an orderly approach to changing her life, Anne in tow, in
order to leave a different mark on those around her and thereby rewrite both her obituary and her legacy.
The State tasked the district with creating a corrective action plan, or CAP, in
order to rectify its violations and get off probation, but rejected the
first draft of the plan last month for not being specific enough.
Once we receive the finalized version of your book or manuscript, and you have completed the online
ordering process, you will receive the
first draft of your formatting within approximately 14 days.
After you finish your
first draft, a revision, a critique process or a developmental edit is in
order.
Don't worry and give this
first draft to our experts by placing an
order withTermPaperWriter.org.
In
order to get that idea into a published form, you have to
first get that
first draft.
-- 100 % Custom Written —
First draft sent in advance — 0 % grammar and plagiarism issues — Free unlimited revisions — Help with choosing a topic — Paper amendments — Careful proofreading — Perfect final formatting
Order details
Once we submit the
first draft to you, we allow you to propose changes in
order to make sure that the paper meets not only your expectations but also your lecturers» ones.
If you have already written your
first draft, but would like to make it sound like a good academic paper, we suggest that you
order rewriting service — we will paraphrase what you have written and improve the quality of your work.
As an efficiency fan, I've spent countless hours hunting down these popular techniques and testing them out in
order to take my writing to the next level and get my
first drafts written faster (and better).
The present AR4 - WGI process started back in April 2004 when the author teams of the report were selected and the Lead Authors
first met in September in Italy to launch the composition of the «zero
order draft» which was subsequently submitted to the Technical Support Unit (TSU) for an informal review by invited experts (mostly well - known scientists).
I believe that WG1 review comments (with names of reviewers), and the author responses, will be published when the full copy - edited report comes out in January, along with the
First and Second
Order Drafts of the chapters — this will enable people to see what the comments referred to, and how the authors addresses those comments.
In the
First and Second
Order Drafts of the chapter, the authors seemed happy to leave the discussion at that.
Update, per a reader's email:
First, from the 2nd
order draft of the IPCC's AR5, and second, from a comment at Judith Curry's «Climate Etc.» blog:
During the second review by government and experts, Second
Order Drafts and a
first draft of the Summary for Policymakers will be distributed through the government focal points to all governments, all authors, reviewers involved in the previous expert review and further experts registering for the review.
Examining the
drafts and comments (available here), indicates that the statement was barely commented in the reviews, and that the WWF (2005) reference seems to have been a last minute addition (it does not appear in the First - or Second - Order Dr
drafts and comments (available here), indicates that the statement was barely commented in the reviews, and that the WWF (2005) reference seems to have been a last minute addition (it does not appear in the
First - or Second -
Order DraftsDrafts).
The second
order draft of the report and the
first draft of the SPM are subject to simultaneous review by both governments and experts.
In the ZOD, the
first page I opened had a contentious statement: «Zero
Order Draft Chapter 2 IPCC WGI Fifth Assessment Report.