First shareholder question: What would have Buffett done differenty to be happy: @WarrenBuffet: «couldn't be happier in life».
Not exact matches
The
question of whether the law actually requires putting
shareholders first has been subject to hot debate.
However the board, and a revamped management team led by Tidjane Thiam, will
first have to answer
shareholders»
questions regarding the Company's strategic direction, looming investigations, and Mr. Thiam's CHF 14.3 million joining award.
Only a few days after Apple announced that it is planning to return as much as $ 100 billion of its cash mountain to
shareholders via buybacks, throughout the Q&A session with Berkshire Hathaway
shareholders, Buffett and Charlie Munger answered several
questions on the topic of why attracted them to Apple in the
first place.
David was also instructed on behalf of the Petitioners (led by Martin Griffiths Q.C.) in a major unfair prejudice petition involving a dispute between the
shareholders in one of England's leading house builders and giving rise to
questions relating to valuation of the minority
shareholder's shares and pro rata vs. discounted valuation in the context of an alleged «quasi-partnership» company (the case settled on the
first day of trial).
He has acted for the liquidator in Edennote v Terry Venables; successfully resisted the winding - up of Stock, Aiken & Waterman; acted for the preference
shareholders in the Barings dispute; advises on claims involving the transaction avoidance provisions of the Insolvency Act; appeared in Edward Klempka: In Re Parkside — important authority on the
question of what amounts to a preference when dealing with common directorships; acted for the Cayman Islands» appointed SPC Receiver in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud case which involved the
first case of a SPC Receiver being recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement; regularly advises on recovery of assets in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rules.
Scotto v. Petch: Re Sedgefield Steeplechase Company (1927) Limited Ref: [2000] 2 BCLC 211 (Lord Hoffmann at
first instance); [2001] BCC 889 (Court of Appeal) Acted for the company at
first instance and on appeal in a case concerning
questions of whether the entry by
shareholders into agreements concerning their shares activated pre-emption provisions in the company's Articles of Association.