Not exact matches
All of the plaintiffs claim that teachers are subject to dismissals and employment actions based on
seriously flawed evaluation
methods.
Of course, even if your various studies did support each other it would not mean that their conclusions were valid, if the statistical inference
methods used in all of them were
seriously flawed, as I have reason to believe.
Moreover, several people told you your
method was of «correcting»
seriously flawed before I pointed out that the topic was a threadjack.
It's a sad state of affairs when your primary
methods to support the
seriously flawed CAGW hypothesis is by insulting those who would dispute it, hiding the science that disputes it, preventing a rational discourse and pushing ever more ludicrous explanations for why the science is wrong and you are right.
(Whereas, as has been shown several times, by several people, Hansen's and Mann's statistical
methods are often
seriously flawed.)