I doubt these changes will end up meaning much because the bedrock of the bill
follows the flawed logic of No Child Left Behind.
Not exact matches
Following this
logic, why is it that theories of Creationism or Higher Being is any less subject to a
flawed epistemology?
ERRic Your
flawed logic was
followed to a
flawed conclusion Humans are social animals, we build communities and work toward common goals, because it is mutually beneficial to do so.
This is not what Supply - Side Economics is, and to characterize the Republican tax plan as «tax breaks for the rich»
follows the same
flawed logic.
The nutrition community has been guilty of
following a
flawed sequence of
logic: If something bad for you (white processed flour) is replaced by something less bad (whole grains) and there is an apparent health benefit, then a whole bunch of the less bad thing is good for you.
Instead, this deeply
flawed and fascinating individual inexorably
follows the internal
logic of his negative thought process to its logical conclusion.
So if I
follow your obviously
flawed logic, none of these cars should be racing at all.
As for the metrics that you've described in measuring the «professional» standard, they are
flawed in the
following respects: Professional via publication — publishers are profit - driven, not a good indicator of excellence; Professional through number in print — numbers can be altered with marketing and time (by this
logic, the Bible, Kuran, and the Communist Manifesto are perhaps the most professional work ever written); Money — there are plenty of professional idiots out there with more money than deserved; Peer review — depends on the peer.
We can get to the
follow - on
logic later, it might be fun — but we can't get anywhere if we don't start with correcting your
flawed understanding of the foundational components.