Sentences with phrase «following oral arguments»

More recently, in In re NYSE Euronext Shareholders Litigation, then - Chancellor Strine of the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a bench ruling following oral argument, declined to issue a preliminary injunction on a stockholder vote to approve the proposed merger between NYSE Euronext («NYSE Euronext») and IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. («ICE»).

Not exact matches

The plaintiffs emphasized in their Monday brief «the importance that the cases move expeditiously to resolution,» adding that the parties will soon submit a «joint proposed schedule for prompt summary - judgment briefing and oral argument following consolidation.»
At 2:15 p.m., Sen. Tony Avella and advocacy groups challenging the «Willets West» mall proposal begin their oral arguments followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps, New York State Supreme Court, 71 Thomas St., Room 210, Manhattan.
WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman Eliot Engel (D - NY - 16) issued the following statement on the day oral arguments were heard before the U.S.
The members of the court, including Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch, heard oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME in late February and appear poised to follow the administration's advice.
Plaintiffs fighting the mandatory dues had been optimistic following January oral arguments, when a 5 - 4 decision in their favor seemed likely.
Oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit begin at 9:00 am CST in the Warren E. Burger Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse at 316 North Robert Street in St. Paul and will immediately be followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.
Oral arguments begin at 10:00 am CST in the William L. Guy Federal Building, located at 220 East Rosser Avenue in Bismarck, North Dakota, and will immediately be followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.
Also, the Times is following up on its Feb. 12 article with the latest in its «Room for Debate» discussions, this one on whether a Supreme Court justice can effectively perform his duties without participating in oral argument.
The court posts video of oral arguments after each hearing on the court's own YouTube channel and provides recordings of all oral arguments on the court's website by noon the following day.
The tape then presents the oral argument, followed by a panel discussion reflecting on the argument.
When students argue in a brief or oral argument that a particular precedent should be followed, they engage in reasoning by analogy.102
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fifth Session, 2010 Term.
The following is the amended calendar of cases that are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its First Session of its 2009 Term on Tuesday, February 10, 2009.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its First Session of its 2009 Term on Tuesday, February 10, 2009.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fourth Session, 2010 Term.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its First Session, 2010 Term.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Second Session, 2010 Term.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Third Session of its 2009 Term on Friday, March 27, 2009.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fourth Session of its 2009 Term on May 22, 2009.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Sixth Session of its 2009 Term on July 16, 2009.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fifth Session of its 2009 Term on July 8, 2009.
The following cases are scheduled for oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Seventh Session of its 2009 Term on October 21, 2009.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Third Session, 2010 Term.
Tweeting about Tuesday's oral arguments before the en banc Fifth Circuit, in the Texas voter - ID case, and a lot of great Twitter activity followed.
The following cases are scheduled for consideration and oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Sixth Session, 2008 Term.
As a follow - up to my last post, I notice that Rory Perry's Weblog has a recently updated list of other appellate courts providing webcasts of oral arguments.
This helps lay the foundation for the following week when you craft your oral argument.
I envision a foundational phase, with articles that teach and illustrate the theory and process of rhetorical analysis, followed by a rich foray into the rhetorical analysis of legislation, judicial decisions, pleadings, contracts, and oral argument, to name a few.
The other rule provides for the dissemination of wristbands «generally following procedures for the distribution of Bruce Springsteen floor admission» and the creation of a new «pit area» for Supreme Court oral arguments.
Any confirming or follow - up written communication should set forth all of the arguments in opposition to the alleged claims, so that, in the event settlement can not be consummated, the communication can serve as an answer to the complaint (in many Small Claims Courts, a formal answer is not required and the Court will readily accept a letter setting forth the defendants» arguments), and be used as an outline for oral argument.
The judgment follows the Supreme Court's decision on 18 April 2016 to cut short oral argument on the basis that it had already concluded that the appeal should be allowed.
Interesting reading follows on this case and the oral argument:
U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo granted Klinger's bid for summary judgment in December, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed his ruling, following Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner's characterization of the estate's argument as a «very aggressive attempt to enlarge copyright law» during oral arguments.
[2] While the notice of appeal raises a wide range of issues, some of which fall outside the ambit of the jurisdiction of any court, the arguments advanced in the factum and in oral argument are somewhat more focussed and may be summarized as follows...
Asylum petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of petition for review following en banc reargument in the Ninth Circuit «threatens the integrity of our processes by inviting manipulation by parties unhappy with the questions at oral argument and fearful of the result they believe the court is going to reach»: So asserts Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski in an interesting dissent joined by three other judges on the fifteen - judge en banc panel.
Following up on his appearance on the Oral Argument podcast, Michael Dorf has a fascinating post up this morning at «Dorf on Law» in which he tackles the intriguing question of whether state courts may choose to «gratuitously» be bound by federal precedents that don't actually bind them under the Supremacy Clause.
Obtained confirmation of arbitral award plus statutory interest following successful oral argument in Massachusetts Superior Court (2017)
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z