More recently, in In re NYSE Euronext Shareholders Litigation, then - Chancellor Strine of the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a bench ruling
following oral argument, declined to issue a preliminary injunction on a stockholder vote to approve the proposed merger between NYSE Euronext («NYSE Euronext») and IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. («ICE»).
Not exact matches
The plaintiffs emphasized in their Monday brief «the importance that the cases move expeditiously to resolution,» adding that the parties will soon submit a «joint proposed schedule for prompt summary - judgment briefing and
oral argument following consolidation.»
At 2:15 p.m., Sen. Tony Avella and advocacy groups challenging the «Willets West» mall proposal begin their
oral arguments followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps, New York State Supreme Court, 71 Thomas St., Room 210, Manhattan.
WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman Eliot Engel (D - NY - 16) issued the
following statement on the day
oral arguments were heard before the U.S.
The members of the court, including Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch, heard
oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME in late February and appear poised to
follow the administration's advice.
Plaintiffs fighting the mandatory dues had been optimistic
following January
oral arguments, when a 5 - 4 decision in their favor seemed likely.
Oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit begin at 9:00 am CST in the Warren E. Burger Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse at 316 North Robert Street in St. Paul and will immediately be
followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.
Oral arguments begin at 10:00 am CST in the William L. Guy Federal Building, located at 220 East Rosser Avenue in Bismarck, North Dakota, and will immediately be
followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.
Also, the Times is
following up on its Feb. 12 article with the latest in its «Room for Debate» discussions, this one on whether a Supreme Court justice can effectively perform his duties without participating in
oral argument.
The court posts video of
oral arguments after each hearing on the court's own YouTube channel and provides recordings of all
oral arguments on the court's website by noon the
following day.
The tape then presents the
oral argument,
followed by a panel discussion reflecting on the
argument.
When students argue in a brief or
oral argument that a particular precedent should be
followed, they engage in reasoning by analogy.102
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fifth Session, 2010 Term.
The
following is the amended calendar of cases that are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its First Session of its 2009 Term on Tuesday, February 10, 2009.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its First Session of its 2009 Term on Tuesday, February 10, 2009.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fourth Session, 2010 Term.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its First Session, 2010 Term.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Second Session, 2010 Term.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Third Session of its 2009 Term on Friday, March 27, 2009.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fourth Session of its 2009 Term on May 22, 2009.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Sixth Session of its 2009 Term on July 16, 2009.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Fifth Session of its 2009 Term on July 8, 2009.
The
following cases are scheduled for
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Seventh Session of its 2009 Term on October 21, 2009.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Third Session, 2010 Term.
Tweeting about Tuesday's
oral arguments before the en banc Fifth Circuit, in the Texas voter - ID case, and a lot of great Twitter activity
followed.
The
following cases are scheduled for consideration and
oral argument before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands in its Sixth Session, 2008 Term.
As a
follow - up to my last post, I notice that Rory Perry's Weblog has a recently updated list of other appellate courts providing webcasts of
oral arguments.
This helps lay the foundation for the
following week when you craft your
oral argument.
I envision a foundational phase, with articles that teach and illustrate the theory and process of rhetorical analysis,
followed by a rich foray into the rhetorical analysis of legislation, judicial decisions, pleadings, contracts, and
oral argument, to name a few.
The other rule provides for the dissemination of wristbands «generally
following procedures for the distribution of Bruce Springsteen floor admission» and the creation of a new «pit area» for Supreme Court
oral arguments.
Any confirming or
follow - up written communication should set forth all of the
arguments in opposition to the alleged claims, so that, in the event settlement can not be consummated, the communication can serve as an answer to the complaint (in many Small Claims Courts, a formal answer is not required and the Court will readily accept a letter setting forth the defendants»
arguments), and be used as an outline for
oral argument.
The judgment
follows the Supreme Court's decision on 18 April 2016 to cut short
oral argument on the basis that it had already concluded that the appeal should be allowed.
Interesting reading
follows on this case and the
oral argument:
U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo granted Klinger's bid for summary judgment in December, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed his ruling,
following Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner's characterization of the estate's
argument as a «very aggressive attempt to enlarge copyright law» during
oral arguments.
[2] While the notice of appeal raises a wide range of issues, some of which fall outside the ambit of the jurisdiction of any court, the
arguments advanced in the factum and in
oral argument are somewhat more focussed and may be summarized as
follows...
Asylum petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of petition for review
following en banc reargument in the Ninth Circuit «threatens the integrity of our processes by inviting manipulation by parties unhappy with the questions at
oral argument and fearful of the result they believe the court is going to reach»: So asserts Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski in an interesting dissent joined by three other judges on the fifteen - judge en banc panel.
Following up on his appearance on the
Oral Argument podcast, Michael Dorf has a fascinating post up this morning at «Dorf on Law» in which he tackles the intriguing question of whether state courts may choose to «gratuitously» be bound by federal precedents that don't actually bind them under the Supremacy Clause.
Obtained confirmation of arbitral award plus statutory interest
following successful
oral argument in Massachusetts Superior Court (2017)