Not exact matches
Did you know: Washington, DC has a higher concentration of
lawyers per capita than any other city in America, with one
lawyer for every 19 residents.
The general practitioner is disappearing and the
per capita number of
lawyers in private practice has been decreasing
for decades.
Too many
lawyers per capita inevitably results in a driving up of demand
for legal (especially litigation) services.
When there are too many
lawyers per capita (an evil second only to too few
lawyers per capita), then the
lawyers are not busy unless they work to make themselves busy, mostly by putting too many frankly unnecessary hours into a matter (churning), and by looking under every rock
for a reason to sue, sue and sue.
On a
per capita measure of
lawyers per state, Washington has 276.7
lawyers for every 10,000 residents.
See the US experience
for the miseries caused by the shallow notion that too many
lawyers per capita is a good thing.
No, if I were looking
for work as a
lawyer, I might head to one of the Dakotas or Arkansas, the states with the lowest numbers of
lawyers per capita.
The grim realities you refer to are caused mostly by there being far too many
lawyers per capita — a problem that has infected the US legal services market
for decades (yet, we can not seem to learn from the petri dish next door; instead, we just blunder along copying their errors and hoping that somehow, after setting up their legal environment, we will somehow avoid their problems.
There are relatively few
lawyers per capita here, and a very large set of profitable activities is reserved
for lawyers to the exclusion of potential competitors.
Too few
lawyers per capita is a very bad thing
for a society.
Much greater bencher concern there needs to be
for what CanLII's former President, Colin Lachance says, about private practice's statistics showing that the number of such
lawyers per capita is shrinking; see: «Law's Reverse Musical Chair Challenge» (Slaw, June 16, 2016).