Ardsley Union
Free School District spends $ 20,262 per year per student.
Not exact matches
In planning its budgets, the park
district does not keep count on how many children attend its
free after -
school activities, raising questions about whether tax money is
spent efficiently.
The Huntington Union
Free School District, which operates eight
schools with 4,650 students,
spent an average of $ 4.7 million less than budgeted each year, according to the audit, released Friday by the state Comptroller's Office.
Through the revised SNS provision in ESSA,
school districts are
freed from this restrictive formula, but they are still required to report how they
spent their Title I funds — and the law's plain language gives auditors what they need to check the books.
The Rochester City
School District is
spending more than $ 5 million in federal funds to provide
free tutoring for low - income students.
My point about unrestricted is that it may be a better indication of what things a
district or
school is «
free» to
spend on (even though even some of that is encroached on).
She points me to a recent investigative report by the Detroit
Free Press that finds, «It is difficult to know how charter management companies are
spending money... Unlike traditional
school districts, the management companies usually don't disclose their vendors, contracts, and competitive bid documents.»
For a
district qualifying under this paragraph whose charter
school tuition payments exceed 9 per cent of the
school district's net
school spending, the board shall only approve an application for the establishment of a commonwealth charter
school if an applicant, or a provider with which an applicant proposes to contract, has a record of operating at least 1
school or similar program that demonstrates academic success and organizational viability and serves student populations similar to those the proposed
school seeks to serve, from the following categories of students, those: (i) eligible for
free lunch; (ii) eligible for reduced price lunch; (iii) that require special education; (iv) limited English - proficient of similar language proficiency level as measured by the Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2 of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk of dropping out of
school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out of
school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups of students.