From biblical scholarship alone, for example, we probably know more today about the life and times of Jesus than was known at any period since the second generation of Christians.
The authors often cite scripture, but, as in this case, do not make their hermeneutic explicit, seeming to apply a very literalistic method without much benefit
from biblical scholarship.
Not exact matches
if you'd actually give a hearing, you'd understand why the entire field of
biblical scholarship (
from left to right) is giving heed to this argument.
But what many Catholics in the West have learned
from modern
biblical scholarship is a profound distrust of the Bible: This didn't happen; that's just a metaphor; this is a myth.
According to this myth,
biblical scholarship was a struggle outward
from dogma into the freedom of history, and upward to the higher truth finally realized in 19th - century Germany.
Of course, process theology can not fulfil this responsibility without interpreting Scripture, and the separation of process theology in recent decades
from the close involvement in
Biblical scholarship of the earlier Chicago school has led to critical weaknesses which are only now being addressed.1 Nevertheless, for process theology the appropriate relationship to the Bible can not be exhausted by hermeneutic.
From Origen's hope that salvation will eventually be received by all, to Karl Rahner's assertion that other religions can serve as pointers to Christ, to Clark Pinnock's
biblical case for a more optimistic view of salvation, I've found that tucked away in the dusty corners of Christian libraries is a wealth of
scholarship on the subject.
I explain that it's taught
from the vantage - point of the academic discipline of
biblical scholarship.
I do the best dog - and - pony show I know how to do, not only to make that point of view as clear as I can but exciting with vignettes
from the history of
biblical scholarship, the conflicts, and so forth.
As professional
biblical scholarship stands now, few would argue that the gospel accounts are 100 % accurate, and that nothing was borrowed
from other faiths and mythologies.
There is overwhelming
biblical scholarship for the full equality of women and that the interpretation of scripture to exclude women
from roles by gender (rather than gifting) has been found to be rooted in patriarchy, an ancient worldview that became intertwined in the growth and doctrine of the church.
3)
Biblical scholarship relating the creation account of Genesis and ancient Near Eastern cosmology continues to become more accessible to the average reader, so Christian university students are in a great position to learn
from Bible professors why a literal, scientific reading of Genesis 1 and 2 need not be a fundamental element of the Christian faith.
Coming
from a wide variety of denominational backgrounds, they accept the findings of
biblical scholarship.
Biblical scholarship further loosened faith
from propositions.
Usually Jenny Lawson breaks the ice with a bizarre, profanity - laced story about a mummified bat (or peasant or ferret); then Scot McKnight jumps in with his thoughts on the latest
biblical scholarship, followed by an update
from NPR on today's news.
Published originally with the title
From Reimarus to Wrede, it could hardly have been expected to leave such an impact, for it is mainly a survey of
biblical scholarship in regard to Jesus between the writings of Reimarus in 1778 and Wrede in 1901.
The man who does not yet know (and that still means all of us) that we know Christ no longer according to the flesh, can learn it
from critical
biblical scholarship: the more radically he is shocked, the better it is both for him and for the cause.
Science and archaeology have verified many
biblical claims and serious
scholarship from believers and non-believers have verified the Bible's veracity time and time again.
The Navarre Bible, that wonderful commentary which has done so much to seed the wasteland of contemporary
Biblical scholarship, refers in connection with the passage I quoted
from Matthew (9:36) to words of St Margaret Mary Alacoque: «This Divine Heart is a great abyss which holds all good, and he commands that all his poor people should pour their needs into it.
In seeking to distance itself both
from the theologians of past
biblical scholarship and
from the ideological controversies of current literary criticism, it risks promoting a disturbing provincialism.
Whether I am capable (some would say, guilty) of such conventional accoutrements of
scholarship readers could judge
from my thesis («The Testament of Job: Introduction, Translation, and Notes,» Harvard Ph. D. thesis, 197I) or
from an article in the Merrill C. Tenneyfestschrifi, «The Limits of Ecstasy: An Exegesis Of 2 Corinthians 12:1 - 10,» in Current Issues in
Biblical and Patristic Interpretation, ed.
In a more recent work, American Catholic
Biblical Scholarship: A History
From the Early Republic to Vatican II, Fogarty offers, among other things, a useful antidote to the claims of some Catholic «restorationists» that the anti-Modernist excesses of the early twentieth century were the invention of fevered post-Vatican II liberal imaginations.
Shoddy «
biblical scholarship»
from a «pastor.»
But it was also the case that, as Alter moved
from making brilliant observations about a small selection of texts to writing large commentaries on entire
biblical books, the weaknesses of his
scholarship became more visible.
In this respect, his approach is very different
from that of another distinguished literary critic, Robert Alter, author of The Art of
Biblical Narrative, who deprecates what he calls the excavative techniques of professional biblical scholarship and works with the text as it is, in its fin
Biblical Narrative, who deprecates what he calls the excavative techniques of professional
biblical scholarship and works with the text as it is, in its fin
biblical scholarship and works with the text as it is, in its final form.
Before continuing to review the discussion as it has been carried on within Protestant theological circles, we may perhaps be permitted a brief excursus into the realm of Roman Catholic
biblical scholarship, for Strauss's book produced an immediate reaction
from a Roman Catholic New Testament professor in which what has come to be, to the best of our knowledge, the standard Roman Catholic viewpoint, was developed.
His seminary education (where «I could concentrate on critical
biblical scholarship because I already knew the
biblical content and narratives so well») and his later faith experiences and human encounters made it possible for him to analyze and interpret his own history in a way that has freed him to preach
from the totality of that experience to the totality of human experience, encompassing as it does suffering and celebration, alienation and reconciliation, sin and redemption.