Sentences with phrase «from teaching point»

I had the site, I had the planning permission, I had the water supply right onsite, I had a little bit of expertise in construction, and I got tremendous mileage out of it from a teaching point of view.»

From teaching point of view, I think our school system did not significantly changed from many years ago, we still teach Math, Science, Language Arts etc».

Unio is perfect from a teaching point of view.

From a teaching point of view, the educator says it has given him tremendous insight into exactly where his students are and where they're likely to be at the end of Year 12 if they continue on as they are.

Not exact matches

He graduated from - and later taught at - the US Military Academy at West Point, an institution guided by the motto «Duty, Honor, Country.»

Asked about the remarkable arrest, in which the suspect appeared to draw an object from his pocket and point it at the policeman, Chief Saunders answered: «The officers here are taught to use as little force as possible in any given situation.»

Raising three daughters and one son taught me a lot about seeing things from their point of view.

West Point's Combating Terrorism Center was founded in 2003 to teach and study everything from extremist groups» root motivations and grievances to their operation, recruitment, and financing.

He points out «we are taught from a very young age to feel badly when we fail.»

And in this episode of the podcast, you will hear from Tony and Ray as they discuss the evolution of Ray's career, the catastrophic mistakes he made that almost destroyed everything he built, and how the lowest points in his life taught him his biggest lessons.

To teach me how to transition properly from an academic point of view to a practical business point of view.How has being part of the Kode With Klossy community transformed your experience of learning to code?

«At one point I recognized that Warren Buffett, though he had every advantage in learning from Ben Graham, did not copy Ben Graham, but rather set out on his own path, and ran money his way, by his own rules...» I have just quickly glanced at Bronte Capital's blog post, but I am sure Todd Combs and Ted Weschler were not hired because they lived and died by Buffet's word but rather because they manifested the teachings of value investing in their own styles.

Daily physical therapy to rehab her knee, taught Lauren that with the right attitude and determination anything was possible, and from that point on fitness became a lifestyle.

Interviewer: Yeah, I think you brought up and interesting point about being vulnerable and companies need to do that, which is different from what we're taught as marketers.

However, if you view this from the Hebrew point of view, «teachings» are not «kept» or «broken» the same way.

I'm just pointing out that facets of religion are used in many aspects of growing up to teach morality and right from wrong and teach a society behavior.

i beleive there is good out there, and as a Mom i want to make sure i live me life in a way that will make my daughter proud of me so i will introduce Church to her and i will teach her the commandments because whether or not Moses came down from the mountain with two tablets in his hands they are a good starting point to instill good morals.

DO understand where your philosophy came from and how it evolved from earlier thoughts to the point you were taught it.

But this is not from the teachings of Christ but instead from a disiples my point is that Christ had nothing to say about it

gordonhide: Those are human traits but they are still taught, thus my point stands - we are not born knowing right from wrong.

When someone is accused of «cherry - picking» verses from the Bible, it means that they have a particular doctrine or idea they want to teach to others, and rather than considering «the whole counsel of God,» they pick a choose a few select verses from various books of the Bible which seems to prove their point or present their case in the strongest possible way.

At one point you define heresy as departure from the apostles» teaching and at another you define it as departure from historic church teaching.

If you're doing something clearly contrary to the teachings of the Bible, he (or any other believer) can point it out to you and recommend you turn away from it.

And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence of early trinitarian teaching).

Proponents of the movement to excommunicate Kerry point out that abortion differs from such issues as just war and capitol punishment in that Catholic teaching on the issue is unequivocal.

As Robert Chiles pointed out, during the nineteenth century, American Methodism as a whole shifted from Wesley's teaching of free grace to an emphasis on the freedom of the will.

Alfred Neumann in Six of Them tells of a German professor of law who continued teaching in the early days of the Hitler regime, lecturing on justice with pointed reference to its subversion in the Nazi state.36 When fired from his position, the professor, his wife, and a loyal band of students publish secretly copies of his lectures and other material attacking the injustices of the regime.

As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.

In particular, we may note that there are three points at which the Kingdom teaching of the synoptic tradition tends to differ both from Judaism and from the early Church as represented by the remainder of the New Testament: in the use of the expression Kingdom of God for (1) the final act of God in visiting and redeeming his people and (2) as a comprehensive term for the blessings of salvation, i.e. things secured by that act of God, and (3) in speaking of the Kingdom as «coming».

There is no question here of discussing the point that within certain limits even the teaching Church in its doctrine does not always and absolutely have to be preserved from the outset from every error.

Scot McKnight was the first person to draw my attention to the fact that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to learn from women scholars» (The Blue Parakeet, p. 148).

At these points it is reasonable to suppose that we have emphases deriving from the teaching of Jesus.

Thus we are faithful only if we use the freedom resulting from institutional separation of church and state in order to develop, preach and teach an integrated, theologically rooted perspective concerned at each point about «truth.»

Jesus understood the Kingdom of God as being manifest in his ministry; all else in his teaching takes its point of departure from this central, awe - inspiring — or ridicule - inspiring, according to one's perspective — conviction.

I explain that it's taught from the vantage - point of the academic discipline of biblical scholarship.

Any Catholic who rejects Catholic teaching, or who technically accepts it but minimizes it to the point of insignificance, is not a «moderate» Catholic but a dissenter, or one seeking approval from the world (a temptation Our Lord warns against)-- and should be identified as such.

If Jesus did not rise from the dead, as you point out, following Jesus» teaching and example is still the best way to live.

If you ask the average Christians how God is most clearly revealed in Jesus Christ, they may talk about His teachings, His miracles, or maybe even His resurrection from the dead, but few would point to the cross.

Gadamer, of how the inspired text, which we question in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly in doing so; for in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study of sacred theology into a venture in secular ideology.

I agree that religion ought to be taught in schools from an historical and factual standpoint and not favor any religious point of view.

I do realize that you are being sarcastic, however i want to point out that God does not «Call people home» This is another false teaching from these make pretend Christians.

The fact is that Abelard was trying to say, with his own passionate awareness of what love can mean in human experience, that in Jesus, God gave us not so much an example of what we should be like but — and this is the big point in his teaching — a vivid and compelling demonstration in a concrete event in history that God does love humanity and will go to any lengths to win from them their glad and committed response.

Many process writings in the field of theology approach biblical teaching from the outside, whereas Wesley approached all questions from a point of view that was immersed in scripture.

This is a very different starting point from traditional Christian teaching which began with God, the Creator, who came to earth in Jesus Christ.

To start from a point where Jesus occupied common ground with his Jewish contemporaries may help us to appreciate both the organic relationship of his teaching to its matrix in Judaism, and the new departure it marks.

«39 Remove the probability of error as one's starting point and instead substitute a «scientific» (inductive) approach to Scripture, one beginning with the Bible's own teaching concerning its infallibility, and building criticism of it from there, and even these more difficult problems dissipate.

This relation of the Christian teaching to life (in contrast with a scientific aloofness from life), or this ethical side of Christianity, is essentially the edifying, and the form in which it is presented, however strict it may be, is altogether different, qualitatively different, from that sort of learning which is «indifferent,» the lofty heroism of which is from a Christian point of view so far from being heroism that from a Christian point of view it is an inhuman sort of curiosity.

It is true that both the gospels and the speeches of Peter and Paul in Acts give important testimony as to what the apostles taught about the Christian life and proclaimed about the meaning of Jesus» own life, death, and resurrection; yet both the gospels and Acts were written, not by apostles, but by later disciples, and their evidence on particular points stands in need of confirmation, if possible, from the apostles themselves.

On the other hand, there is capitalism which, in its practical aspect, at the level of its basic principles, would be acceptable from the point of view of the Church's social teaching, since in various ways it is in conformity with the natural law....

Matthew follows his temptation story with a brief description of Jesus» first teaching (4:17, compare Mark 1:15), having first pointed to Jesus» fulfillment of a saying from Isaiah 9:1 - 2.