Sentences with phrase «front side crash test»

Not exact matches

Still, even in some vehicles with a symmetrical design for the front of the SUV, front overlap crash test results for the driver's side and passenger's side yielded different results.
And when it came to the side impact and front moderate overlap crash tests, all three models earned the top evaluation of «good.»
Meanwhile, a second testing agency, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, has given the Chevrolet Volt a «G,» the highest safety score possible, after side crash tests on the front, side, rear and rollovers.
Safety In crash tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Equus earned top scores in front, side, roof - strength and rear tests.
Safety, Reliability & Mileage Acadias built after January 2011 are Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Picks, meaning they scored the institute's highest rating «Good» in all four crash tests the institute performs: front, side, rollover and rear, and have standard electronic stability systems.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety hasn't performed its full battery of crash tests, but the MKX received the agency's best score of good in moderate - overlap front and side crash tests.
This hiring, according to the publication, comes as sources within FCA suppliers state that the new Giulia had repeatedly, «failed to pass internal front, side, and rear crash tests
Front and rear crash tests of the sedan received top marks of Good, while side tests produced Marginal ratings, which are second worst.
To earn the rating, cars must receive top scores of Good in front, side and rear crashes, as well as pass roof - strength tests that measure rollover protection.
Requirements for the Top Safety Pick + award include «Good» ratings in the IIHS» moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraint tests; either a «Good» or «Acceptable» rating in the difficult small overlap front crash test» and at least a «Basic» rating for front crash prevention technology.
In 2009, the TSX was named a Top Safety Pick by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, having earned the highest score of Good in front, side and rear crash tests.
Safety & Reliability The Acura TSX gets the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's highest score, Good, in front, side and rear crash tests.
The new small overlap frontal crash test, designed to simulate what would happen when the front corner of a car collides with another vehicle or object, constitutes the front end of the driver's side striking a five - foot tall rigid barrier at 40 mph.
Safety, Features & Pricing In crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the X5 scored the top mark, Good, in front, side and rear impacts.
Safety The Q70 has a five - star overall crash - test rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and it earned top scores of good in moderate - overlap front, side, rear and roof - strength tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
In individual tests, it scored three stars in a front crash test, five stars in a side - impact crash test and four stars in a rollover - resistance test.
SAFETY The 2013 BMW X5 received the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's highest rating of Good in front -, side - and rear - impact crash tests.
Safety The Eos earned scores of good in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's front - and side - impact crash tests; it was not tested in other areas.
Safety, Features & Options In crash tests by the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, the Optima earned top marks in front, side, rear and roof - strength evaluations, earning IIHS» Top Safety Pick status.
To earn a Top Safety Pick + designation, vehicles must score a good rating in the moderate overlap front, side, rollover, and rear crash tests, in addition to an acceptable or good rating in the newer, more challenging small overlap front test.
The 2011 (and 2010) Ford Taurus is designated a Top Safety Pick by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, meaning it scored the institute's highest rating (Good) in front, side and rear crash tests and a roof - strength test, and that it comes with a standard electronic stability system.
The US News and World Report gave the Altima hybrid an overall score of 8 out of 10 — but a 9.9 for safety, based on crash and rollover tests, plus antilock brakes, traction and wheel stability control, and front, side and head - curtain airbags.
To qualify for 2017 TOP SAFETY PICK, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests, as well as an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention.
The 2018 Ford Escape got the lowest score of poor for its protection of a front - seat occupant in the new small overlap front crash test on the passenger side.
The VRC's 22,000 - square - foot crash hall has three runways to accommodate front and side tests replicating crashes into another vehicle or fixed object.
The IIHS annually recognizes vehicles that do the best job of protecting people in front, side, rollover and rear crashes based on good rating in a series of tests conducted by the Institute.
Results in the driver - side small overlap and moderate overlap front crash tests are given priority in this ranking.
In both front and side impact crash testing, the 2002 Audi A4 received good safety scores across the board.
To earn Top Safety Pick, vehicles must achieve good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests; earn an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention; and also have at least acceptable - rated headlights.
In government crash tests the 2014 Audi A6 received a perfect five - star rating in overall, front crash, side crash and rollover tests.
To qualify for the 2018 Top Safety Pick + award, vehicles must earn a good rating in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests; an acceptable or good rating in the passenger - side small overlap test; an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention; and a good headlight rating.
The ratings bring to 16 the number of small SUVs the Institute has evaluated in the passenger - side small overlap front test, which was introduced in 2017 to encourage manufacturers to offer the same level of protection for front - seat passengers as drivers in this type of crash.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Protection gave the Escape its top score of «Good» in a number of crash tests, including side and moderate overlap front tests.
In order to qualify for a Top Safety Pick, a vehicle has to earn the highest rating on five of the crashworthiness tests, which consists of side crash tests, roof strength, head restraints, moderate overlap front and small overlap front.
The NHTSA gave the 2004 Nissan 350Z with a full five out of five stars in rollover resistance and side front seat crash tests.
The Chrysler Pacifica received the U.S. government's highest crash test rating of five stars for both front - and side - impact when equipped with optional side - curtain air bags.
Side airbags for front passengers are standard in every Beetle, and the car scored well in crash testing.
The 2010 Chrysler Town & Country received the highest possible U.S. Government crash test rating of Five Stars in both front and side impact tests.
The Challenger doesn't perform well in small overlap crash testing, scoring «Marginal» results from the IIHS, but scored best results of Good for the moderate front overlap and side impact test.
The CR - V was rated «Good» - the highest score available from the IIHS - in side impact testing, roof strength testing, and moderate overlap front crash testing, making it a Top Safety Pick from the organization for the 2012 and 2013 model years.
With a full complement of standard air bags — including dual - stage, dual - threshold front - driver and passenger bags; front - side bags with passenger seat - occupant detection; and side curtain bags — the 2006 Honda Accord EX scores well in government crash testing.
To qualify as an IIHS Top Safety Pick +, vehicles must perform well in the IIHS small overlap front crash test in addition to head - on, side, and rollover tests.
To qualify for the 2018 award, vehicles must earn a good rating in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests; an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention; and an acceptable or good headlight rating.
The Ridgeline pickup achieved a 5 - star Overall Vehicle Rating in the NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) by scoring 5 stars in the frontal crash tests for driver and passenger, 5 stars for side crash tests for both front and rear seats, and 4 stars in the rollover test.
In government crash tests the 2014 Honda Odyssey earned an overall rating of five stars, with five stars in front and side crash tests and four stars in rollover safety tests.
In addition to its outstanding crash test scores, the car's passive and active safety equipment includes four antilock disc brakes, front - seat side airbags with individual chambers for chest and hip protection, a set of side curtain airbags, and Volvo's «City Safety» slow - speed frontal - collision mitigation system.
This Legacy earned the maximum five stars in all three of the feds» destruction tests — frontal crash, side crash and rollover — for driver and passengers, front and rear seats.
Like the Taurus, the Forester owned a Top Safety Pick ranking from the IIHS (for the model years 2009 to 2013) due its repeated «Good» rating in front, side, and roof crush crash testing - the latter being an area where Subaru has developed a reputation as a stand - out.
The Institute conducted two crash tests in which the fronts of Chevrolet pickup trucks struck the sides of 1999 Volvo S80s.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z