June 1, 2015 Commissioner Workshop, in Support of the AB 1257 Report, on
Fugitive Methane Emissions in California's Natural Gas System
Not exact matches
Using ethane as a tracer for
fugitive methane emissions, his team found two high - emitting sites
in the central United States.
«[Howarth et al.'s] analysis is seriously flawed
in that they significantly overestimate the
fugitive emissions associated with unconventional gas extraction, undervalue the contribution of «green technologies» to reducing those
emissions to a level approaching that of conventional gas, base their comparison between gas and coal on heat rather than electricity generation (almost the sole use of coal), and assume a time interval over which to compute the relative climate impact of gas compared to coal that does not capture the contrast between the long residence time of CO2 and the short residence time of
methane in the atmosphere.»
Industry, with the full support of the administration, continues the fait accompli of radically expanded natural gas fracking across the country, with serious unresolved issues about
fugitive atmospheric
methane emissions and the potential for contamination of drinking water aquifers — and with no adequate federal regulatory structure
in place.
More and more people are learning about how bad fracking is, even Robert F. Kennedy jr, came out and publicly admitted that Fracking is not a safe bridge away from fossil fuels and is worse for climate change then using coal because of the
fugitive methane emissions that are released
in the fracking process's.
Then again, to the extent that natural gas substitutes for coal
in electricity generation (and
fugitive methane emissions are low) and electric vehicles powered by relatively clean electricity substitute for gasoline and diesel, CO2
emissions over the next two decades could be far less than expected 10 years ago.
But thanks to the University of Texas, the Environmental Defense Fund, and others, we have taken a tremendous step forward
in filling
in our knowledge about the exact nature of
fugitive methane emissions.
The tar sands
in Canada are an environmental disaster
in other ways, but the incremental
emissions of greenhouse gases are small compared to the far greater threat of massive coal expansion
in China, or potential
fugitive emission of
methane from fracking, or massive deforestation
in Indonesia and Latin America, or any number of other major sources of greenhouse gases.
In addition to vented emissions, methane losses can occur from leaks (also referred to as fugitive emissions) in all parts of the infrastructure, from connections between pipes and vessels, to valves and equipmen
In addition to vented
emissions,
methane losses can occur from leaks (also referred to as
fugitive emissions)
in all parts of the infrastructure, from connections between pipes and vessels, to valves and equipmen
in all parts of the infrastructure, from connections between pipes and vessels, to valves and equipment.
While it's clear that some companies are taking advantage of best practices to reduce these
emissions, there are also now many more companies operating
in this space — it's impossible to determine how many of them are actively reigning
in fugitive methane.
Fugitive methane emissions from natural gas systems represent a significant source of global warming pollution
in the U.S. Reductions
in methane emissions are urgently needed as part of the broader effort to slow the rate of global temperature rise.
A new study
in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences sheds light on a question that continues to vex industry executives and policymakers alike: How significant are
fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production?