It is
Full Commission Rate, Full Service Realtor, and No Mere Postings.
Not exact matches
The agency
commissioned a survey that found 720,000 families would struggle to make payments on their home - equity loans if interest
rates rose by a mere 0.25 percent, and almost one million would be in trouble if borrowing costs rose a
full percentage point.
These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated
full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange
rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).
But your incentives and
commission rates are friendly, you went through the right hiring processes, your salespeople all have great track records, the product they're selling has proven interest, and the sales pipeline is
full...
Traders who can meet its $ 100,000 minimum deposit for margin trading are rewarded with an industry - leading
commissions schedule, margin
rates, and
full support for international trading.
In those days that amount was considered a very cheap
commission rate as many of the large «
full service» brokerages charged anywhere from $ 100 to $ 300 a trade.
Transactions placed by the firm in the process of correcting a margin call will be charged
full commission fees (i.e. Electronic Brokerage Service
rates do not apply).
A discount stock broker — A discount stock broker will simply carry out buy and sell orders for their clients, and charge lower
commission rates than
full - service brokers.
Our
full service trading
commission rates start as low as $ 9.95 per side depending on account size and client history.
Discount stock broker: Unlike
full - service stock brokers, discount brokers simply carry out buy and sell orders for their clients, and charge lower
commission rates than
full - service brokers.
This was when stock markets were averaging 15 % annually, 3 % GDP growth was considered a bad year, government bonds yielded between 5 % and 10 %, the highest marginal tax
rate on ordinary income was ~ 70 %, just about the only way to invest was to pay a
full - service stockbroker over 5 %
commission to buy a stock or a mutual fund, and inflation was averaging 4 % to 8 % annually.
This flat -
rate commission structure is significantly less expensive than those of all the large,
full - service brokers, such as TD Ameritrade, Charles Schwab, and Fidelity.
This is where the Legal Services
Commission pays a reduced hourly
rate, # 50 instead of # 120 for junior counsel, and the practitioner retrieves his
full rate from the costs award.
If you are at a new IMO agent 60 % contract
rate and sold a nonmedical mortgage protection policy through the right insurance company, you would earn a
full 60 %
commission.
The Package * Competitive Salary starting in the range # 25,000 - # 30,000 dependent on experience * Competitive
commission scheme — flat
rate of 25 % plus additional quarterly and annual cash bonuses * # 4,500 car allowance dependent on experience * Excellent working environment *
Full programme of sales incentives with recent prizes including trips to Las Vegas and the Maldives!
At the standard
commission rate, after few showings and a few advertisements, I would be a loser even if it sold at
full listed price, which was doubtful.
If you asked your seller on the way out the door, with their signed listing in hand, if they would compensate another agent (which most likely will not be you) an above - market
rate of
commission to bring them something close to
full price, I bet 85 per cent plus would say yes!
The fact that we debate what the aforesaid should entail, and that there are those who feel free to spin the meaning of «
full service» around, until it stops at a point on their
commission wheel that works with their perception of a marketable
rate of
commission, hurts our credibility as an industry.
This same Brokerage (in its online presentation) claims that a Seller who chooses to use the MLS «mere posting» option, should be prepared to pay a Buyer's Agent a higher
rate of
commission than what is the case with what they (said Brokerage) claim will work when a Seller chooses to work with them using their «
full service» option!
I don't believe that there was ever any collusion, it was more a case of a true
full service brokerage usually being able to generate, more or less, the kind of value added that was usually equal to the
commission rate that they sought to charge, and the higher
commissions, in part, contributed to the value added results.
It's actually funny to watch buyers shop like crazed maniacs, scouring the internet for an.125 % in
rate, but will then lay down like sheep and allow a
full 3 POINTS, (and on the
full sales price) real estate
commission in Tax Free Home Equity to slip thru their fingers as if it's Monopoly Money... and claim to be «experienced and savvy» buyers!
In the MLS system there are various business models — everything from a limited brokerage to a
full service brokerage, everything from flat fee to negotiated
commission rates.
You're also guaranteed to achieve a much higher listing - to - selling success
rate and retain
full commission.
There is a rebellion brewing out there amongst the populace against «all»
commission - hungry real estate salespeople, be they
full - service traditional brokerages or cut -
rate «new way» brokerages, and it is the powers - that - be at the top of the real estate transaction - industry pyramid who are to blame.
Has anyone considered that may be some of them that are charging reduced
commission rates are still providing
Full Service (yet to be defined by anyone) or even better service than the so called, «
Full Service» broker.
The lion's share of business at ERA Stephens in Houston is
full - service and
commission based, but for the small percentage of sellers who want their services unbundled, broker George Stephens charges a
commission rate that's lower than his
full - service
rate, and, where needed, a cooperating broker fee.
So it is your position then that a «
full commission», is any fixed
commission rate that has been set or stipulated to by a brand (ReMax and Royal LePage being brands, for example only) and even if the same brand was owned by different Franchisee's they all could be bound to charge the same
commission rate, from coast to coast — ergo creating the generic expression: «
full commission»?
The balance (75 - 80 percent) will pay a
full commission if you can show them how hiring you will help them obtain a higher price than listing with an agent who provides only limited or cut -
rate service.
While you may have assumed that the standard
commission rate is 6 percent — and it is, indeed, the preferred
rate at many
full - service, traditional brokerages — the actual national average was 5.26 percent in 2015.
But just as buyers tend to focus on the
rate, sellers tend to focus on the
commission and not the
full, true cost of selling.
Research shows that 15 percent of sellers make decisions based on the agent's
commission rate, and another 5 percent to 10 percent are willing to pay
full commission to get the best service.
Finally, if sellers point out that another agent has a lower
commission rate, agents should ask them how well could they negotiate on their behalf if they can not negotiate a
full commission for themselves, using a question to remain in control of the negotiation and to help sellers come to their own conclusion.
Listed via
full service at going
rate commission.
If you go back 20 years, the average
commission rate was a
full percentage point higher,» he said.