Further points of fact: The Treaty of Tripoli was written under Washington, signed by Adams, and passed Congress without a single comment.
Not exact matches
It's time we Americans woke up to the
fact that our desire to be «tough on crime» has gone way past the
point of fairness and usefulness and is now just ruining lives and consuming precious resources that could be
far better used elsewhere.
He made a good
point in highlighting the
fact that, despite all the attention being paid to cryptocurrencies, the market value
of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies overall is
far smaller than the stock market.
The
fact that these expectations have not been fulfilled in the nearly nine years since the initiation
of zero interest rates, notwithstanding the recent 25 - basis -
point Fed rate hike, leads us to believe that investor credulity in central bankers may be stretched about as
far as it can go.
No less a value conscious investor than Warren Buffett commented on this shift at the most recent Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, where he
pointed to the
fact that the largest companies in the S&P 500; Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, and Google generate
far more cash per dollar
of earnings than companies
of the past.
None the less, I applaud your
far reaching attempt to make a
point although the
fact that you even know about Euhemerus is a product
of Christian learning and appreciation
of alternate views.
All biblical evidence
points to the
fact that there was an understanding about the nature
of the earth and many other topics
far beyond the secular understanding
of the time.
As an aside, the irony might be lost on you that, despite the
fact that so many atheists here are so quick to note that believers do not have a monopoly on morals, you are essentially proving the
point of believers that, from a historical perspective, atheists
far more than believers have lacked morals vis - a-vis war and death.
One might go
further and
point out that the concept
of «person» helps us understand human dignity as something deriving from the
fact of one's intrinsic being» rather than from the extent
of freestanding autonomy, the «quality
of life,» that a person might demonstrate.
So the theme
of the «great surprise,»
far from a rhetorical device as Stendahl terms it (7:794), is in
fact the
point of the passage: the righteous are commended precisely because they acted humanely without knowledge
of Jesus» presence and therefore without the calculating attitude Matthew attributes to the Pharisees.
We can summarize the discussion up to this
point by saying that the literary form
of Mark's tomb pericope shows definite signs
of having developed in three stages, consisting
of two appendices with one third final addition (leaving aside the
fact that in the second century a still
further addition
of Mark 16:9 — 20 was made) and that because
of this, it may not have been part
of the author's original plan as he set out to write his Gospel.
2 A. Jepsen, Nabi (Munich, 1934), probably goes too
far in distinguishing between Yahwistic prophetism in North and South but he very properly
points to the
fact of frequent mention
of priest, temple, and sacrifice in reports
of the activities
of prophets in Judah (I Sam.
However, the Association
of Christian Teachers has described the move as a step too
far, speaking on Premier's «News Hour», Chief Executive
of ACT, Clive Ireson said: «from a Christian
point of view they're aren't nurseries;
of very many
of them that would be teaching it as a scientific
fact during their science curriculam, they'll be teaching it during their RE curriculam areas and those bible stories like creationism need to be taught during that time».
As
far as the nutrition
facts for this recipe, uh, I'll just briefly
point out that at least these will give you a serving
of vegetables for the day — leafy greens at that!
That said my
point was that saying the Sixers haven't beaten a Kyrie team since 2012 - 2013 is kind
of misleading, you and I both know there are lots
of teams the Sixers didn't beat in that time span, and the
fact that Kyrie played 2nd fiddle to the best player in the world during three or four years in that stretch only
further exaggerates his ability to singlehandedly down the Sixers.
By
far the best article I have ever read on this site, there was no bias or empty statements, just cold hard
facts, the writer even respected wengers budget but still
pointed to where he should've improved, there are no excuses, what you read is literrally all u get with arsene, if you gave him a budget
of 9m or 1 billion, he will ALWAYS take the risk cause he doesn't give a fk about the consequences as if he was a teenager raging through puberty, his stubborn is absolutely pathetic, can you believe he turned down signing a keeper when almunia was shocking, can you believe he didn't sign a CB when squillaci was awful, can you believe that he REFUSED to sign a CDM for almost 8 years, CAN you believe on one
of the most important transfer windows
of arsenals history, arsene decided to go host charity matches in rome, that's right instead
of trying hard for the fans that have respected him and pay him one
of the highest managerial wages in the world, he decided to do what he pleased as usual, cause he doesn't answer to anyone, nor does he giving a flying fk, gazidis a man i thought was also a crook went and did arsene's job for him and at least got us a striker (which cost us the title in january last season) and arsene foolishly proclaims that «if i was here we wouldn't
of signed danny» meaning we wouldn't
of had ANY recognised cf till giroud recovered, arsene wenger is a joke
of the highest order, lack
of respect, lack
of shame and lack order, i despise him
Olivier Giroud is another
point in
fact, he misses
far more than he scores and while I am impressed with his hold up play he is NOT fast enough or sharp enough to deliver the good that a sole striker or main tip
of the spear should do.
why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as
far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless
of the
facts, this was sadly again another example
of a team putting business ahead
of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3
points...
of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end
of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 %
of Sanchez is still better than a 100 %
of the vast majority
of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply
far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some
points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box
far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the
fact that he's been played out
of position
far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a
fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the
fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
In
fact his average
of 20.8
points per 36 minutes is not
far off from Carmelo Anthony's 25.5
points per 36.
Considering how absolutely awful we've been so
far, hiw many pkayers are nit performing, how many injuries we've got and rhe
fact we've played some
of the top teams this actually says to me things could be worse, was it last ywar we were in 16th place at one
point.
Facts of the season so
far, we have half the
points of the league leaders, less
points than this time last year, only two fit first team defenders, more money in the bank than ever before.how much proof do you need that wengers job is to make money for his boss and not win trophies.
Let's get the
facts straight here.He never demanded # 400,000 a week.All that is just media talk.However, I support your
point of the
fact that him going does not mean disaster.We've survived with
far better players leaving you know.If Arsenal had replaced Van Persie the season he left we would've challenged them for the title that season.However, at that time we were financially poor and had to settle for some second rate players.Now we are in a better financial position and I expect us to be more ambitious and that involves trying as much as possible to replace any player who leaves.This doom prediction doesn't show the character
of a top club.Even Chelsea won't behave like how we do if they lost Hazard.I hate the way Arsenal allows players to treat it.I actually thought only smaller clubs behaved that way.
Chelsea have
of course been all the talk so
far this season, as their fantastic performances have already brought them an 8
point lead at the top
of the table with 16 games to go and the
fact they have conceded only 15 goals in 22 matches certainly says a lot about their season.
In
fact, for breaking down a side, having Giroud as the focal
point of the attack makes
far more sense: he can play one - two passes with Mesut Özil, Alexis and Aaron Ramsey, and he's also a target for crosses.
My fear stems from the
fact that a renowned economists and a vice Presidential candidate
of a party whose philosophy stands on ideals
of conservatism, will confidently move around with a message
of establishing one factory in each district at this
point of our national reconstruction.How do you implement such a policy after scrapping 70 %
of taxes across, build 350 secondary schools, free secondary school etc.You sum up all these deceitful platitudes and you begin to shiver.We are made to believe that the issue
of unemployment would be buried under their government forgetting that, we were made to lineup in hot sun to register for employment only to be told in 2005 by Ghana Statistical service that unemployment figure for that year was the highest do
far and remains the highest today.The lowest unemployment figures recorded between 2001 - 2016 was recorded in 2013 under Mahama.So who possess the practical record to support his call.
The
fact that Bloomberg avoiding being critical
of the Assembly Democrats on the charter school cap issue even as the pro-charter advocates have placed the blame squarely on that chamber and its cozy relationship with the teachers union,
further proves the
point.
Quite apart from the
fact that proportional representation is * fair *, and therefore a
far better starting
point for a Parliament that is responsive to the will
of the people, the difference between Caroline and most Labour or Conservative MPs is that she is trying to ensure that a referendum on voting reform actually offers a meaningful choice.
In particular, Cameron can
point to the
fact that
far too little EU spending is geared towards delivering the growth, jobs and competitiveness that Europe so desperately needs, given that a large chunk is wasted on agricultural subsidies and the recycling
of regional development funds around the EU's wealthiest member states.
The
fact that Cameron kept on making this same
point anyway only managed to
further highlight the weakness
of his position.
«Our findings for this study provide important starting
points for using small molecule imaging techniques to explore MAO - B
further at the organism level, and in
fact, opens up future prospects for non-invasive imaging - based diagnostic applications,» said Dr Li Lin, the first author
of the paper and a post-doctoral fellow in Prof Yao's lab.
Re # 29 (yartrebo): Two
points: First, upon
further examination, I found that in
fact credits are usually given for «Coal Mine Methane» which is considered the subset
of «Coal Bed Methane» that are in seams meant to be mined.
In
fact, I would go a step
further and
point out that rapid loss
of bodyweight correlates very highly with a greater chance
of relapse, weight re-gain and long term failure.
Back to the Experimental Evidence Denise Minger went not just beyond the bestselling book and into the abyss
of thousands upon thousands
of data
points known loosely as the original monograph but traveled even
further through the lands
of the roughly one thousand references Campbell provides among his supporting evidence to find a critical study that Campbell himself had published showing, in
fact, that the central thesis
of his book — that animal foods, and specifically animal protein, are uniquely harmful to consume — is false.
It is interesting to note that the KBs are able to produce more energy compared with glucose because
of the metabolic effects
of ketosis — the high chemical potential
of 3 - β - hydroxybutyrate leads to an increase in the ΔG0
of ATP hydrolysis.3 A
further point to underline is, as shown in Table 1, that glycaemia, even though reduced, remains within physiological levels because
of the
fact that glucose is formed from two sources: from glucogenic amino acids and from glycerol liberated via lysis from triglycerides.7
In
fact, I would go as
far as to say I think one could lose even more weight if they left out
point # 1 completely and ate a breakfast full
of real whole foods instead
of this processed, sugared junk.
Despite the lessening
of madcap energy, Shrek the Third is still quite funny in parts, with some fresh throwaway gags to produce chuckles now and then from characters you'd think they probably should have jettisoned long ago, but are secretly glad they've kept around (the Gingerbread Man, Pinocchio, etc.) The
fact that they are keeping in nearly all
of the characters introduced in the series thus
far is a bit
of a double - edged sword, as they do provide a certain respite from the main characters that are already cycling through the same jokes all over again, but on the other hand, it's getting to the
point that the high overhead
of injecting scenes for all
of these characters takes away from the focus
of the story at large.
In
fact, Vantage
Point is
far,
far more interesting than Spy Game because it also takes the opportunity to put some
of John Powell's Bourne music in here - but it's pretty hard to like.
Without exploring Lebanon's own sectarian violence, choosing sides, or justifying behavior — in
fact, without naming the country where the film takes place — she presents a fairy - tale metaphor for the conflict, in which the men
of the village are quick to arms and to finger -
pointing when anything goes wrong, and the women are willing to make any compromise and to try any
far - fetched, crack - brained idea to defuse or distract.
At one
point Poirot abruptly reveals a
fact that comes from so
far out
of left field that it destroys any fun the audience might have in playing along with clues — and confusion lingers throughout the rest
of the film.
Now, getting from this
point to a signed law remains a hell
of a lift — but the
fact that things have gotten so
far is a credit to Alexander, House education chair John Kline, Democrats like Senators Patty Murray and Michael Bennet, and the bipartisan fury at Secretary Arne Duncan's imperious reign.
The
fact that our speaker was widely acknowledged as one
of America's foremost journalists felt
far less important to me than the
fact that he was a graduate
of my own school — a
point my introduction emphasized with shamelessly chauvinistic institutional enthusiasm.
Infographics, which are an eye - catching illustrated method
of getting your
point across, are
far more interesting than using long and boring lists
of facts.
In
fact, effects that may appear significant at the conclusion
of the program itself frequently fade to the vanishing
point by the time youngsters have progressed as
far as 3rd grade.
«Even though black parents might prefer racially balanced schools, the
fact that white parents prefer schools with
far lower proportions
of black students sets up a tipping
point,» the authors write.
With 755 horsepower the 2019 Chevrolet Corvette zr1 is the most powerful Corvette ever it's also the most technologically advanced behind me are the rolling s's at Road Atlanta and we're here to see if we can reach to the supercar levels
of performance afforded by this thing's massive power big tires and the tall wing on the back after that we'll take to the streets to see if a car this powerful can behave itself in public this is a monster
of a car I've had some brief track opportunities moving this morning to get used to the pace
of this machine which is phenomenal we're gonna warm up as we get out to the road Atlanta and sort
of build up to the pace that this car can operate at now initially when you hop in this car you have this shrine to the engine right above you you see the line
of the hood it kind
of dominates the center
of the view you can see over it it doesn't affect visibility but it's immediately obvious and that kind
of speaks to what makes this car special it's a monster
of an engine listen to that [Music] that is tremendous tremendous acceleration and incredible power but what I finding so
far my brief time here at the Atlanta is that everything else in the car is rut has risen to match hurt me while I lay into it on the back straight look you know 150 mile - an - hour indicated we're going to ease up a little bit on it because I need to focus on talking rather than driving but like I was saying the attributes
of the rest
of the car the steering the braking capability the grip every system
of this car is riding to the same level
of the power and I think that's what makes it really impressive initially this is undoubtedly a mega mega fast car but it's one that doesn't terrify you with its performance potential there's a level
of electronic sophistication that is unparalleled at this price
point but it's hard not to get you know totally slipped away by the power
of this engine so that's why I keep coming back to it this car has an electronically controlled limited slip differential it has shocks filled with magnetically responsive fluid that can react faster to inputs and everything this car has a super sophisticated stability control system that teaches you how to drive it quick but also makes you go faster we haven't even gotten into exploring it yet because the limits
of this car are so high that frankly it takes a while to grow into it but [Music] I think what's impressive about this car is despite how fast it is it is approachable you can buy this car to track dates with it and grow with it as a driver and as an owner I think that's a really special [Music] because you will never be more talented than this car is fast ever unless you are a racing driver casually grazing under 50 miles an hour on this straight okay I'm just going to enjoy driving this now [Music][Applause][Music] this particular Corvette zr1 comes with the cars track performance package a lot
of those changes happen underneath the sheet metal but one
of the big differences that is immediately obvious is this giant carbon fiber wing now the way this thing is mounted is actually into the structure
of the vehicle and it makes you know loading the rear hatch a bit more difficult but we're assuming that's okay if you're looking for the track performance this thing delivers also giving you that performance are these Michelin Pilot Sport cup tires which are basically track oriented tires that you can drive on the street but as we wake our way to the front
of the thing what really matters is what's under the hood that's right there's actually a hole in the hood
of this thing and that's because this engine is so tall it's tall because it has a larger supercharger and a bunch
of added cooling on it to help it you know keep at the right temperature the supercharger is way larger than the one on the zo six and it has a more cooling capacity and the downside is it's taller so it pops literally through the hood the cool thing is from the top you can actually see this shake when you're looking at it from you know a camera from the top
of the vehicle this all makes for 755 horsepower making this the most powerful Corvette ever now what's important about that is this not just the power but likewise everything in the car has to be built to accommodate and be able to drive to the level
of speed this thing can develop that's why you had the massive cooling so I had the aerodynamics and that's why I had the electronic sophistication inside [Applause] we had a lot
of time to take this car on the track yesterday and I've had the night to think about things Matt today two crews on the road and see how this extreme performance machine deals with the sort
of more civil minded stuff
of street driving the track impressions remain this thing is unquestionably one
of the most capable cars you can get from a dealer these days a lot
of that's besides the
point now because we're on the street we have speed limits they have the ever - present threat
of law enforcement around every corner so the question is what does this car feel like in public when you slow this car down it feels like a more powerful Corvette you don't get much tram lining from these big wheels though we as the front end doesn't want to follow grooves in the pavement it is louder it is a little firmer but it's certainly livable on a day to day basis that's surprising for a vehicle
of this capability normally these track oriented cars are so hardcore that you wouldn't want to drive them to the racetrack but let's face it you spend more time driving to the track than you do on the track and the
fact that this thing works well in both disciplines is really impressive I can also dial everything back and cruise and not feel like I'm getting punished for driving a hardcore track machine that's a that's a really nice accomplishment that's something that you won't find in cars that are this fast and costs maybe double this much the engine in this car dominates the entire experience you can't miss the engine and the whole friend this car is sort
of a shrine to it the way it pops out
of the hood the way it's covered with coolers around the sides it is the experience
of this car and that does make driving this thing special and also the
fact that it doesn't look half bad either in
fact I think it has some
of the coolest looking wheels currently available on a new car this car as we mentioned this car has the track package the track package on this car gives you what they call competition bucket seats which are a little wide for my tastes but I'm you know not the widest person in the world this automatic transmission works well I mean there's so much torque again out
of this engine that it can be very smooth and almost imperceptible its clunky on occasion I think I'd might opt for the manual although Chevy tells me about 80 %
of its customers will go for the automatic I don't think they're gonna be disappointed and that's gonna be the faster transmission drag strip on the street - and on the racetrack man it was a little bit more satisfying to my taste though we've talked about the exhaust I have it set in the track setting let's quiet it down a little bit so you can hear the difference now I've set that separately from everything else so let's put it stealth what happened to the engine sound that's pretty that's pretty amazing man stealth is really stealth and then go back to track Wow actually a really big difference that's that's pretty great the Corvette has always been a strong value proposition and nowhere is that more evident than this zr1 giving you a nearly unbeatable track performance per dollar now the nice thing is on the road this doesn't feel like a ragged edge track machine either you could genuinely drive it every day the compromises are few and that's what makes this car so special if you like what you see keep it tuned right here and be sure to visit Edmunds.com [Music]
You could also
point to the more powerful processor on the Galaxy Note 4 (which is undoubtedly true
of the Snapdragon 805), but this view must be tempered by the
fact the 805 chip driving
far more pixels because
of its larger resolution 2560 x 1440 screen.
We don't have the
facts at this
point for either
of us to guess how
far Dear Author can get with the CDA claim.
He helped push the Bank on Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act while
pointing out the
fact that «interest rates for [student] loans are often
far higher than other forms
of consumer borrowing.»
I suppose most people play consoles on their couch, possibly with a coffee table in front
of them increasing the distance to their TV; however, that really doesn't seem to matter much when arguing the
point because the difference is technically noticeable if you look CLOSE and people will claim they notice the difference from
far away, even though I think that is wishful thinking unless * maybe * if they have 20/15 or better vision... I think that is more
of a «
FACT!»