Sentences with phrase «future nuclear fuel»

The Uranium Production Cost Study complements UxC's Uranium Market Outlook (UMO) and Uranium Supplier's Annual (USA) in identifying where expanded and new uranium supply will come from among 116 worldwide projects to meet future nuclear fuel demand through 2030.

There is also an estimated 37 x 10 ^ 18 becquerels worth of radioactivity in the oceans from naturally dissolved uranium in seawater anyway, which some view as a future nuclear fuel source but is not generally considered a health risk.

Not exact matches

However, at least two of the state's nuclear reactors are in danger of closing within the next few years and would significantly increase air pollution because they would be replaced by fossil - fuel burning power plants in the near future.

Electricity may be what fuels our future — electricity from renewables, nuclear, and even from burning biomass.

For the future, look to radical solutions like glucose - based fuels, smart storage, or tiny mass - produced nuclear power plants.

Any future discussion of nuclear power will have to take a hard look at regulation and safety, in particular the practice of storing spent nuclear fuel rods on - site

The work, published in Science, not only opens the door to expand the use of one of the most efficient energy sources on the planet, but also adds a key step in completing the nuclear fuel cycle — an advance, along with wind and solar, that could help power the world's energy needs cleanly for the future.

Concerns about global warming and oil's imminent demise have caused scientists and policy - makers to look for solutions in both the future and the past: to new technologies such as nuclear fusion, multijunction photovoltaics, and fuel cells — and to traditional energy sources such as water power, wind power, and (sustainable) biomass cultivation (coupled with clean and energy - efficient combustion).

Some scientists have argued that thorium, a more abundant element that can be bombarded with neutrons to produce the fissile fuel isotope uranium233, could become the nuclear fuel of the future.

Others, meanwhile, could reduce future nuclear waste burdens by operating for decades without refuelling, burning up more of their fuel and generating smaller volumes of waste.

As President Obama's Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future continues to ponder what role nuclear power might play in the U.S. electricity supply, a group of scientists, engineers and other experts assembled by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.) released a report on the nuclear fuel cycle paid for by the nuclear inNuclear Future continues to ponder what role nuclear power might play in the U.S. electricity supply, a group of scientists, engineers and other experts assembled by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.) released a report on the nuclear fuel cycle paid for by the nuclear innuclear power might play in the U.S. electricity supply, a group of scientists, engineers and other experts assembled by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.) released a report on the nuclear fuel cycle paid for by the nuclear innuclear fuel cycle paid for by the nuclear innuclear industry.

Nuclear waste is either a millennia's worth of lethal garbage or the fuel of future nuclear reactors — Nuclear waste is either a millennia's worth of lethal garbage or the fuel of future nuclear reactors — nuclear reactors — or both

A study projects 130 future cancer deaths from the meltdowns at the reactors in Fukushima last year, but does that suggest nuclear power is safer than fossil fuel alternatives?

Elements in this so - called island of stability could act as powerful nuclear fuel for future fission - propelled space missions.

It's also critical to a future less dependent on foreign oil: Hydraulic fracturing, «clean coal» technologies, nuclear fuel production, and carbon storage (the keystone of the strategy to address climate change) all count on pushing waste into rock formations below the earth's surface.

If the government decides to continue subsidising the nuclear industry, future investment in coal and other fuels may be jeopardised.

The Obama administration established the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future on January 29, 2010 to conduct a comprehensive review of spent fuel and high - level waste policies and recommend a new plan.

Over the years, Ms. Eisenhower has served as a member of three blue ribbon commissions for the Department of Energy for three different secretaries: The Baker - Cutler Commission on U.S. Funded Non-Proliferation Programs in Russia; The Sununu - Meserve Commission on Nuclear Energy; and the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, which released its findings on a comprehensive program for the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the winter oNuclear Energy; and the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, which released its findings on a comprehensive program for the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the winter oNuclear Future, which released its findings on a comprehensive program for the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the winter onuclear fuel cycle in the winter of 2012.

Arguably the best and most current economic comparison of nuclear and fossil - fueled plants is by Professor Paul L. Joskow in a recent interdisciplinary MIT study, «The future of Nuclear Power.nuclear and fossil - fueled plants is by Professor Paul L. Joskow in a recent interdisciplinary MIT study, «The future of Nuclear Power.Nuclear Power.»

The award honors Tartakovsky's research on subsurface flow that addresses past and future energy needs: cleaning up buried nuclear or toxic contaminants and storing carbon dioxide from fossil fuels underground.

However, the long - term future of nuclear power will employ «fast» reactors, which utilize ∼ 99 % of the nuclear fuel and can «burn» nuclear waste and excess weapons material [243].

The moral of the story, in essence, is that «future energy» — at least through the next couple of decades — is largely the same as current energy, with gains in efficiency and growth in adoption of renewable sources and nuclear power still not substantially blunting growth in the combustion of fossil fuels.

«I am struck by the lack of fundamental breakthroughs required for an abundant, clean energy future, whether in electricity generation from wind, coal (IGCC), ocean thermal, ocean wave, ocean tide, solar, nuclear, or liquids from coal - to - liquids, gas - to - liquids, biofuels, bio-engineered fuels, and so on.»

I think the only hope we have of phasing down emissions and getting to the middle of the century with a much lower level of fossil fuel emissions — which is what we will have to do if we want young people to have a future — we're going to have to have alternatives and at this time nuclear seems to be the best candidate.

If we shut down Indian Point and other nuclear power plants, we will become even more dependent — at least for the foreseeable future — on fossil fuels, which, in addition to spewing out toxic pollutants, also contribute to global warming.

They agree with me in such statements as «'' A critical factor for the future of an expanded nuclear power industry is the choice of the fuel cycle — what type of fuel is used, what types of reactors «burn» the fuel, and the method of disposal of the spent fuel.

Germany and France will heavily shape future European and even global energy and environmental policies — Switzerland, Sweden, Belgium and other nations may also phase out their nuclear plants — but to date there has been little investigative reporting on the planned shift from nuclear energy to fossil fuels and renewables.

Severnini's methods — which took into consideration the geographical and temporal variation in exposure to the additional pollution — could be used to estimate future health impacts in nations that are closing nuclear plants and replacing them with plants using coal and other fossil fuels such as Germany, Japan, and the USA.

I think the key to future liquid fuels (and a couple of small industries like farming and aviation) will be cheap hydrogen from nuclear.

There is no doubt in my mind a) that we will not reach anywhere near this level by 2100 as VP's extrapolation projects b) that there will be an economically and politically viable alternate to fossil fuels long before they run out (there already is in nuclear for the biggest part of the future load)

I would agree 100 % that building nuclear power plants using today's best technology to cover a majority of future electrical energy needs or to replace old fossil fuel plants that are being decommissioned anyway makes sense.

For the Foreseeable Future, Wind and Solar Energy Can not Effectively Replace Fossil Fuel and Nuclear Energy

Nuclear power could, in future, provide an effectively unlimited supply of petrol, diesel, jet fuel, etc. https://bravenewclimate.com/2013/01/16/zero-emission-synfuel-from-seawater/.

«The retirement of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is a key opportunity to demonstrate how California can meet its future energy needs without new fossil fuels plants,» said Evan Gillespie, Director of the Sierra Club's My Generation campaign.

If we continue to allow nuclear plants to close, then we will cede nuclear energy globally to Russia and China and allow future energy demand to be met by fossil fuels.

By overlooking nuclear power in the quest for clean energy, we are condemning ourselves to a future of increased fossil fuel use.

(iii) Energy policy and the fuels (in particular nuclear) employed for the future.

My anti-nuclear, pro-renewable relatives now living in California believe it is only the entrenched opposition of well - financed nuclear and fossil fuel interests which prevents America's rapid transition into a mostly wind and solar energy future.

It's a taster of the diverse groups and individuals behind the movement for a future free from fossil fuels, and an introduction to our Fossil Free Europe campaign, calling for a just transition to a 100 % renewable, no nuclear, super energy - efficient, zero - fossil - fuel Europe by 2030.

When powered by cheap virtually unlimited nuclear fission or in future nuclear fusion energy we'd have unlimited liquid transport fuels.

Huber expects a fossil fuels production to peak but sees a big future for nuclear power.

The future of nuclear fuels seems quite likely to be focussed on fuel recycling and re-fabrication rather than mining and geological storage.

As such, to realize reduced global temperatures (compared to a baseline fossil fuel future), even in the second half of this century, would instead require a «rapid and massive deployment of some mix of conservation, wind, solar, and nuclear, and possibly carbon capture and storage.»

The same lobbyists are keen on talking about the future, but I see the medium term (> 50 years) as being predominantly only fossil fuel (shale gas / coal) and / or nuclear, whether we like it or not.

Nuclear fuel is effectively unlimited for the foreseeable future.

Cheap and plentiful uranium, together with the plutonium produced by uranium use, could fuel nuclear plants for the foreseeable future.

Although Quillen and Petters come from companies with vastly different business interests in energy — Quillen with coal and Petters with nuclear and wind power — both men agree that renewable energy and fossil fuels will have a long - term role in the country's future energy portfolio.

PNNL is testing an adsorbent that could more effectively extract trace amounts of uranium from seawater and help fuel future nuclear power development.

Since beginning the great Energiewende transition from fossil fuels and nuclear energy, Germany has gone from strength to strength, leading the EU in both economic growth and emissions reduction as it moves toward a clean energy future.

It's also critical to a future less dependent on foreign oil: Hydraulic fracturing, «clean coal» technologies, nuclear fuel production and carbon storage (the keystone of the strategy to address climate change) all count on pushing waste into rock formations below the earth's surface.