Sentences with phrase «future past i felt»

I grew up a huge X-Men fan, beginning with the cartoons, then the comics and Brian Singer «s first two films, and watching Days of Future Past I felt all that love come rushing back as it delivered on the key elements I used to adore.

Not exact matches

It doesn't just make us feel happy about the past; nostalgia actually makes us less fearful about the future.

When the thoughts start to race on about the future, we find ourselves anxious; when the thoughts get stuck about events from the past, we feel depressed.

i don't know if you've ever felt the weight of your sins / mistakes but imagine taking ALL of that for EVERY person past, present & future.

Feel free to search the archives to weigh in on past posts, and subscribe to weigh in on future discussions.

I think stress, at its core, is feeling worried about things that aren't going your way presently, didn't go your way in the past, or might not go your way in the future.

What kind of satisfaction the initial aim is directed toward is determined by the relevant possibility for its actualization, as established by its past, that will give it the greatest intensity of feeling and also contribute maximally to the future of the nexus of which it is a part.

The relational view presented here responds to those questions by showing the inherent social responsibility all our experiences carry with them and by urging that careful attention be given to cultivating our feeling - for the future that God envisions, given the actual events of the past.

Conceptual feeling is necessarily vectored always more or less specified, oriented toward an ought or worth to be fulfilled and an enrichment to be enjoyed by others in the future just as it now enjoys or suffers those in its past.

It is an extension to others, both human and nonhuman, of that empathetic identification we normally feel toward our own personal pasts and futures.

At the backward end of this duration the feelings fade into the past; at the forward end they shade into the anticipated future.

Clearly state what your thoughts are: * Here is what I think is going on; Clearly state what your current feelings / emotions are: * I am glad; * I am sad; * I am mad / angry; * I am frustrated; Clearly state what your wants are: * For your self; * For the person one is addressing; * For the people one is addressing; * For other involved people; * For other uninvolved people; Clearly state what actions: * You have taken in the past; * You will take now; * You will take in the future;

When actual entity B feels actual entity A, there (usually) are actual entities «between» them, namely, those actual entities that the causal future of A has in common with the causal past of B.

But the error in this view becomes obvious, for Bergson believes, like James, that upon introspection of our conscious lives we find the components of consciousness related internally; we find a penetration of the felt past and the anticipated future in the present.

We do not, then, merely have in the present feeling a mingling of the immediate past, but also the immediate future anticipated.

Memory and anticipation are aspects of that field of feeling which is the self; and through these modes of perception the past and future are immanent within the self.

But if there is a state in which the soul finds a solid enough base to rest itself on entirely and to gather its whole being into, without needing to recall the past or encroach upon the future; in which time is nothing for it; in which the present lasts forever without, however, making its duration noticed and without any trace of time's passage; without any other sentiment... except that of our existence, and having this sentiment alone fill it completely; as long as this state lasts, he who finds himself in it can call himself happy... with a sufficient, perfect, and full happiness which leaves the soul no emptiness it might feel a need to fill....

That is, make sure you know that no matter what you do or say, think or feel, do in the future or have done in the past, that Jesus gives you eternal life as a completely free gift.

Also, as soon as this new event of feeling is complete, it becomes part of the past world and compels future occasions to take account of it.

produces percepta which are vague, not to be controlled, heavy with emotion: it produces the sense of derivation from an immediate past, and of passage to an immediate future; a sense of emotional feeling, belonging to oneself in the past, passing into oneself in the present, and passing from oneself in the present towards oneself in the future, a sense of influx of influence from other vaguer presences in the past, localized and yet evading local definition....

And we too come feeling all of those things: confused about our past, bewildered about our present and scared about our future.

In «propositional feelings,» on the other hand (cf. PR 184 - 207), the same initial indifference to truth or falsity remains, but now attention focuses on a future or potential world as well as a past, actual one.

Since there is no numerical identity between the various selves in the same ancestral chain, I look back upon past experiences and forward to future ones with both altruistic and self - interested feelings.

We have regrets or feel pride in past acts and anxieties about what the future will bring.

Internal relations, wherever they exist, imply feelings of some sort, be it as memory in relation to the past or anticipation in relation to the future.

But my feeling of that past also feels many other aspects of that past, perhaps its discomfort or its hope for some more distant future.

I mark the feelings of low mood and am told that the scores indicate that I am more anxious about the future (a score of twelve) than concerned about the past (a score of nine).

This includes the objective form according to which feelings of causal efficacy prehend past actual occasions, the subjective form — how the occasion prehends — and the subjective aim of the present concrescence — how it wants to be a datum for future becomings.

The former are those aspects of a feeling whereby its many objective poles in the past are synthesized by a single future - independent subjective pole in the present; the latter is that aspect of a feeling whereby its many objective poles may be synthesized by many subjective poles in addition to itself, either in the past or in the future.

While it is now true that those unactualized feelings will manifest the categories, it is not true that that «future» fact explains the categories» manifestation in the present or in the future; rather, as argued above, it is the past in its ever - increasing entirety which will always have provided that explanation.

I argue that God exists in all three time - dimensions simultaneously: as a determinate past actuality in virtue of the divine consequent nature, as an indeterminate future reality in virtue of the divine primordial nature, and as a concrescing present reality in virtue of the ongoing integration of the divine primordial and consequent natures.1 Yet, while I agree with Ford that there is no way for finite actual occasions objectively to prehend that integration of the primordial and consequent natures within God even in terms of their own self - constitution here and now, I would also contend that finite actual occasions still feel the feelings of God toward themselves as a result of that integration of the primordial and consequent natures within the divine being.

He will not, of course, be exactly the same person, and consequently he will feel less responsibility for the past than he will feel for maximizing the present moment's contribution to the future.

Again, this is not to suggest that an event such as X «will occur» in the future in the same sense that it has occurred in the past but only that the present occurrence of X will remain an unalterable feature of at least some subsequent feelings.

On the one hand, Hartshorne holds that the past affects the future in the sense that previous cases of becoming can influence later cases of becoming; previous feelings of one's own, of God's and of one's body cells can be felt or inherited by one's later feelings.

Since part of the practical function of reason is to effect our survival, and since in employing the second survival strategy reason becomes «the emphasis upon novelty» (FR 20), it is easy to understand how someone in a basically conserving society would value up novelty and future - oriented behavior to the seeming exclusion of order and the preservation of the past via efficient causation (feelings of «causal efficacy»).

At the same time that our present experience is feeling the past it is also oriented toward the future.

Thus did they lay a foundation in the past for the yet more auspicious future towards which they felt themselves moving.

Thus, feelings of guilt and responsibility for the past show us that present - past relationships are not independent of those between present and future.

It is the most primitive form of experience: the present feels the past, and the future will feel a past that includes our present.

Given this integration, then, God feels the occasion, its past, and the finest potentialities this occasion renders possible for a temporal future.

As the year draws to a close, I believe almost everyone has some form of nostalgic feelings — on reflection of the past and anticipation of the future.

The past and future requirements to redefine the term feels like a large dam beginning to fracture with multiple leak points and we're all trying to get as many fingers in as possible to plug up all of the leaks.

If you are constantly dwelling on something that happened in the past or feeling anxious about the future, you are missing out on YOUR LIFE.

Throwing past «data» at one another trying to extrapolate some truth about the future is just arguing about the number of fairies on the head of a pin (since it's Easter, I'm feeling a little Catholic today).

The matador must confront it every day, every second, and each moment of their working life, struggling in the past, present and future of a perversely insular world as death looms close enough to feel its breath on the cheek.

And when i look into the mirror and see myself wearing a 70 bucks arsenal puma jacket i feel so proud ozil should be even prouder i know hea german he may hate the british cuz of world war and stuff but he should forget the past and look into the future

No doubt a continued run of good form will bring with it speculation of interest from members of Europe's «Elite» and that's unavoidable though one would hope that the backing Rodgers has shown Coutinho, both in taking the «risk» in signing him and over the past two years, will result in a feeling of loyalty to a club who are clearly building for the future.

Their odds for the World Series and pennant have certainly improved over the past month, but no team or futures bettor can feel comfortable when the wildcard game is in play.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Great Reception???, tell you the truth Im not one of those gunners who started supporting the gunners during the invicibles or early Wenger double winning years, quite honestly i wasnt ineterested in football and I liked a certain Crespo and Shevchenko meaning I liked the blue half of London, surprisingly when Mourinho joined I stopped watching football all together, till one glorious Champions League Night, It was my first ever Match there was a certain 20 year old highly rated youngster who scored a wonder goal that day he played with such skill and passion ever since then I started supporting arsenal that was during the barren years.I actually liked Barcelona because of their similarity with the arsenal, so when Fabregas joined Barca I started to watch them a bit more I still loved Arsenal and I was extremely passionate, the other players i adored left in painful manners, while some left which was still painful: i.e Eboue.I always taught cesc would come back and when it was official he was leaving Barca i said Finally almost hosting a party.Well reports started coming out that he is going to join chelsea and i laughed so hard and said he would be the last player on earth to do that, when it became official words cant express how i felt, He was the reason I started watching football he lit up the emirates with exquisite touches through balls to walcott, its a shame I would have preferred he joined bayern, or remained in barca its terrible reading the comments he made recently about the emirates, This was a captain, someone who led, anyways, like ive learnt and Arsenal have learnt, We do nt live in the past Like Liverpool (no pun) WE ARE THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE (Crowley)(Puma) WE ARE ARSENAL.....