Sentences with phrase «gdp by»

An EY study reported that repeal of Section 1031 would reduce GDP by between $ 61 billion to $ 131 billion over 10 years.

Foreign trade is expected to double to 60 percent of GDP by 2030, and both seaports and airports are seeing 5 percent growth rates in cargo each year.

Besides that, Japan has benefited from Bitcoin and increased its GDP by 0.3 %.

Moving forward, the research suggested that in the U.K. and U.S., the impact of moving to mixed boards on the S&P 500 and FTSE 350 could boost GDP by around three per cent.

This tax reform is also forecast to increase GDP by between 1 - 2.7 % over a 10 - year time horizon.

In the EU, healthcare spending is expected to rise to nearly 15 % of GDP by 2030.

The scale of the project alone is impressive: it has an expected total capital cost of $ 14.8 bn (# 12bn) and the International Monetary Fund estimates that the mine will generate a third of Mongolia's GDP by the time it reaches full production.

So a 20 percent increase in the rule of law, for example, would increase a nation's GDP by $ 16,644, decrease its homicide rate by two per 100,000 population, decrease child mortality rates by 14.1 per 1,000, and add 5.2 years to average life expectancy.

Even if the world can manage a comprehensive agreement to reduce carbon emissions to near - zero levels by 2050, the best estimates suggest that the economic effect will be to reduce the level of GDP by a few per cent.

... a June, 2008 report by the McKinsey Global Institute... estimates that the macroeconomic costs of what it calls the «carbon revolution» would be between 0.6 and 1.4 percent of GDP by 2030.

Concluding that inaction would essentially reduce global GDP by at least 5 percent annually, he suggested that mitigation, by contrast, would use about 1 percent of global GDP annually.

Global warming will continue to be a net benefit until about 2070, when the damages will begin to outweigh the benefits, reaching a total damage cost equivalent to about 3.5 % of GDP by 2300.

The overall benefits from shale energy production over the next few years are expected to be huge — 3.9 million new jobs and $ 533 billion in additional GDP by 2025, IHS estimates.

We have pledged to lower our emissions intensity of our GDP by 20 - 25 % by 2020.

Reducing the UK's carbon emissions by around 60 % by 2030 (as recommended by the CCC) would: * increase UK GDP by 1.1 % in net terms * result in at least 190,000 additional jobs being created across the UK economy * mean households are financially better off compared to a scenario where little is done to reduce emissions.

By comparison, the Great Recession lowered global GDP by about 6 percent, in a onetime shock; Hsiang and his colleagues estimate a one - in - eight chance of an ongoing and irreversible effect by the end of the century that is eight times worse.

On a global basis, the Julia implementation of FUND3.9 give the following impacts per GDP by component assuming a 3 °C equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS);

Under a high climate change scenario, annual expected losses could rise by another 1 to 3 % of GDP by 2030.

A recent study found that Australia could cut emissions from its energy sector to zero by 2050 and still grow GDP by an average of 2.4 percent over that period.

Another high - cost (but long - term) estimate is from the Oxford model and suggests a 4 % cost of US GDP by 2020 to achieve Kyoto targets without the flexible mechanisms.

The fallout from the scandal reduced Brazil's GDP by an astonishing 3.6 % in 2015, 2016 and 2017, according to leading firm of Sao Paulo consultants GO Associados.

So here is the question: Are Australians willing to delay the growth in real GDP by 12 months and in doing so play their part in global efforts to tackle climate change, or would they prefer to have the growth a year earlier and do nothing about climate change, sponge off the rest of the world and become an international pariah?

In 2015, India committed to reduce the emissions intensity of its GDP by 33 to 35 percent below 2005 levels by 2030.

When China announced its carbon intensity targets (see previous post «China to adopt «binding» goal to reduce CO2 emissions per unit GDP by 40 to 45 % of 2005 levels by 2020 «-RRB-, it was careful to make clear that it was an «autonomous action» (some translated this as «voluntary action»).

The Heritage Foundation estimated that the costs of complying with Cap - and - Trade would include; a 29 % increase in the price of gasoline, losses of hundreds of thousands of jobs, and lead to reductions of $ 1.7 to $ 4.8 trillion of the U.S. GDP by 2030.

Fischer et al. (2002b) quantify the impact of climate change on global agricultural GDP by 2080 as between -1.5 % and +2.6 %, with considerable regional variation.

The majority of these analyses find that the evaluated climate policies impact the US GDP by less than 1 % as compared to BAU.

The estimated costs of inaction range from 2 - 10 % of GDP by 2100 by some estimates, to a fall in projected global output by 23 % in 2100 in others.

For example, meeting the EU's full cost - effective potential would reduce gas imports by 40 % over the next fifteen years, and increase GDP by 4.45 %, compared to business as usual projections.

«If this trend continued or intensified with rising global temperatures, losses from extreme weather could reach 0.5 % -1 % of world GDP by the middle of the century.»

China's 12th Five Year Plan (2011 - 2015) sets a national target for the reduction of carbon emissions, through the reduction of carbon intensity per unit of GDP by 40 - 45 % by 2020.

As part of that accord, China pledged to increase the share of non — fossil fuels in its energy mix to around 20 percent and to lower carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by 60 percent to 65 percent of 2005 levels.

Also, the cost to the economy would be substantial, reducing the size of Mexico's GDP by 4 % in 2040, resulting in a total economic loss of $ 1 trillion over the period of the outlook.

Arctic boosts Russian GDP by 10 %

And not just without increasing emissions, but actually shrinking them by 25 percent per person from 1990 — 2012, all while growing per - capita GDP by 37 percent in the same period and creating what one report has hailed as the second - greenest economy in the world.

«Eliminating the Australian coal industry would reduce Australia's GDP by between $ 29 billion and $ 36 billion per year,» he said.

Ethiopia, for example, could increase GDP by a quarter in 2025 by selling unused emissions rights.

China has announced it will reduce its carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by between 40 and 45 % of 2005 levels by 2020.

The Northern Gateway pipeline would allow access to the growing Asian and Pacific Rim markets, which, according to Enbridge, would boost Canada's GDP by $ 270 billion over the course of the next 30 years.

-LSB-...] to reduce its carbon intensity per unit GDP by 40 - 45 percent by 2020 (see previous post «China to adopt «binding» goal to reduce CO2 emissions per unit GDP by 40 to 45 % of 2005 levels b... «-RRB-.

-LSB-...] Green Leap Forward: China to adopt «binding» goal to reduce CO2 emissions per unit GDP by 40 to 45 % of 2005 levels b... -LSB-...]

China sets 2020 targets to raise non-fossil fuel's share of primary energy consumption to 15 percent, and to reduce carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by 40 to 45 percent compared to 2005 levels.

Because we had to set a deadline for ourselves so that we could actually get our recommendations in the hands of the Chinese, our analysis unfortunately does not include China's most recent announcement regarding its target to reduce its carbon intensity per unit GDP by 40 - 45 percent by 2020 (see previous post «China to adopt «binding» goal to reduce CO2 emissions per unit GDP by 40 to 45 % of 2005 levels by 2020 «-RRB-.

China has set itself a target to reduce water consumption per unit GDP by 60 % by the year 2020, according to Chen Lei, the Minister of Water Resourced and Management.

A new study from REMI finds that a revenue neutral carbon tax could create 2.8 million jobs, increase GDP by $ 1.3 trillion

Target 3: Cut the Carbon - Intensity of GDP by 17 %: Slower energy demand growth combined with increased non-fossil energy supply curbed Chinese emissions growth in 2012.

An analysis of the Fee and Dividend policy shows it will create 2.8 million jobs, grow GDP by $ 1.4 trillion, while reducing emissions more than 50 %.

For the first time, the level of debt held by Canadians had exceeded the country's gross domestic product — up from 98.7 % of GDP in the first quarter of 2016, to 100.5 % of GDP by the end of the second quarter.

Keen (2006) wrote that the debt - to - GDP ratio in Australia (then 147 per cent) «will exceed 160 per cent of GDP by the end of 2007.

The country's future implicit liabilities, such as spending on Social Security and Medicare, are expected to increase from the current level of 10 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) to more than 16 percent of GDP in 2037, and will reach 25 percent of GDP by 2085, according to the Congressional Budget Office's 2012 long - term budget outlook.