Britain is one of just four Nato member states which spend two per cent of more of
their GDP on defence spending.
Not exact matches
The
GDP release also delivered an unwelcome surprise
on government
spending: budget trimming by federal agencies, especially the
defence department, shaved an estimated eight percentage points off growth.
Our
defence is questionable, but would I be more frustrated as a City fan,
spending more than the
GDP of a small country
on 5/6 bang average defenders?
But a separate bill is being proposed to make a similar pledge in
defence, one that makes sure we maintain Nato's target of two per cent of
GDP spent annually
on military expenditure.
In the last ten years (1999 - 2009) Greece has
spent 3.7 % of its
GDP on defence, more than one percentage point more than any other European nation.
And it is why I have already raised with my fellow European leaders the need to deliver
on their commitments to
spend 2 % of their
GDP on defence — and 20 % of their
defence budgets
on equipment.
In 2006, NATO member countries agreed to commit a minimum of two per cent of their Gross Domestic Product (
GDP) to
spending on defence.
MPs have voted 37 to three in favour of keeping
defence spending at 2 % of
GDP which, although it carries no legal force, will pile more pressure
on the prime minister to pledge to protect the
defence budget.
The vote followed a four - hour backbench business debate
on a motion endorsing a minimum level of
spending on defence as 2 % of
GDP — a level set by Nato — in which MPs from across the political spectrum repeatedly urged the government to protect
defence spending.
The share of
GDP spent on defence is just one measure of a nation's
defence effort.
The pair's speeches come a few days after Liz Kendall voiced support of free schools and pledged to meet the Nato target of
spending 2 per cent of
GDP on defence.
Meeting our commitments
on security: committing fully to the NATO alliance and
spending 2 % of our
GDP on defence.
We are
spending 2 % of
GDP on defence and of course it's important we have done that over recent years given the less stable world.
Last year it
spent 3.6 % of its
GDP on defence, the highest ratio of any NATO member (and the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty margin).
Incidentally, Hungary has behaved quite disgracefully towards its NATO allies, reneging
on a pledge that it made as to the proportion of its
GDP it had to
spend on defence.
Cameron was also asked if he could promise to stick to his pledge to retain
defence spending at 2 % of
GDP in the next parliament,
on a trip that saw him pay a farewell visit to Camp Bastion in Afghanistan and the RAF base at Akrotiri in Cyprus where Tornados that have been bombing in Iraq are based.
David Cameron also said the government will
spend 2 % of
GDP on defence and will order four new Trident submarines.
Just what sort of role is there for an organisation that aimed to win wars, when the US
defence department
spends more than the entire
GDP of many countries
on military contracting?