Sentences with phrase «gdp over»

The annual increase in GDP over 2017 marked the 8th consecutive year of growth.

Even without the massive exemptions loaded in to the Rudd government's CPRS, an emissions trading scheme with full auctioning might be expected to raise about $ 10 billion a year, or 1 per cent of GDP over the next decade.

A comparable example is the difference between being able to predict the exact value of the GDP on a given day (something determined largely by unpredictable day - to - day news) and projecting the average increase in the GDP over three decades (plausible estimates of which can be made using scenarios of long - term economic growth and ongoing innovation).

Well, compared to cumulative nominal GDP over 2013 - 2030, which, using the Minister's figuring, will amount to $ 46.1 trillion.

I reproduce Chart 3.32 from the Treasury report above, which measures real GDP over 2010 - 2030, the same figures that the Telegraph found «shocking».

Optimal policies to mitigate and adapt to climate change, economists tell us, won't cost the global economy very much in the grand scheme of things — on the order of 1 percent of total global GDP over the course of the next century.

In Zambia, rainfall variability will lower agricultural growth by 1 percent each year and cost the country $ 4.3 billion in GDP over 10 years (ADBG 2013).

Building this network would require annual investment of roughly 1 - 2 % of Asian GDP over 40 years.

According to the modeling group led by William Nordhaus, a Yale professor widely considered to be the world's leading expert on this kind of assessment, an optimally designed and implemented global carbon tax would provide an expected net benefit of around $ 3 trillion, or about 0.2 percent of the present value of global GDP over the next several centuries.

There is a national goal of reducing energy consumption per unit of GDP over the 2005 to 2010 term by 20 percent.

REMI concluded that CCL's proposal would create between 2.1 to 2.8 million jobs, reduce carbon pollution by 50 %, increase household incomes, save up to 230,000 lives that would otherwise be lost from the pollution of burning fossil fuels, and add up to 1.3 trillion more to the GDP over a 20 year period.

The reason I highlighted the damage cost estimates and that they are trivial in context of global GDP over the 21st century, is to point out that we are wasting an enormous amount of time, effort and money researching something that is not important.

Science and technology have driven 50 % of our growth in GDP over the last 50 years, and yet by 2010 90 % of all scientists and engineers will live in Asia.

Next the costs of buying a stock or mutual fund are so low it's essentially free, GDP over 3 % would be considered a miracle, inflation will be hard pressed to be even 3 % in one - year let alone two years in a row, and bonds don't even yield more than inflation (AKA negative real interest rates).

Altogether, the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, a joint venture between the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, argues that the policies of president - elect Trump could lead to a three to four per cent drop in GDP over the next two decades.

The fact that the volume of mortgages held outright or guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie grew so much faster than either total mortgages or GDP over this period would seem to establish a prima facie case that the enterprises contributed to the phenomenal growth of mortgage debt over this period.

The percentages contributed by each of these sources of production change over time, causing further potential «tracking error» when looking at corporate profits as a percentage of GDP over long periods of time.

Otherwise, cashing out as theShiller PE turns 23 and Market Cap to GDP over 100 % is not a bad idea.

«We estimate that... the creation of the ORPP will generate $ 39.7 billion in GDP over the forecast period from 2017 to 2093,» said the Conference Board.

It calculates that if we could raise our performance to match Finnish schools, a further # 8 trillion could be added to GDP over the lifetime of a child born today.

Figures mapped above show estimated growth in GDP over the lifetime of pupils.

And while Canada, Finland, Japan, and Singapore consistently outperform U.S. students on the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), the United States» lead in GDP over these countries has increased, with the exception of Singapore.

These estimates project the historical pattern of growth to determine the result of gains in student achievement, calculate the additions to GDP over the next 80 years, and discount them back to today so that they are comparable to other current investments.

On current policies these pressures will increase total spending by 3 % of GDP over the next 30 years.

These spending plans imply that spending will fall as a percentage of GDP over the next three years, with a real terms growth rate for public spending of 2.1 %, well below the 2.75 % trend growth rate of the economy.

There are already, new National Assembly Business Environment Roundtable (NASSBER) research findings projecting that our priority bills will have an output impact equivalent to an average of 6.87 per cent of GDP over a five - year period on the economy.

The poor consumer spending in Q1 could be a harbinger of more economic weakness, not only because the consumer is almost 70 % of the U.S. economy, but because average real personal consumption expenditures grew at a faster rate than real GDP over the last three years, 2.9 % to 2.2 %.

Growth of non-farm GDP in 1996 was somewhat below trend, coming in at 2.8 per cent for the year to the December quarter (Graph 1); growth of total GDP over the year was 3.1 per cent.

Growth of non-farm GDP over the latest four quarters for which we have data was just over 4 per cent; domestic demand, while slowing a little from its most recent peak, expanded by 5 1/2 per cent over that period; employment growth over the past year has been around trend, though lower in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained close to the lower end of the range in which it has fluctuated over the past two decades.

The pace of loan growth — 100pc of GDP over five years — is unprecedented in any major economy, eclipsing the great boom - bust dramas of the past century.

And that's that economies — or at least the one's we're concerned about — have tended to grow their GDP over time, too.

The slow growth in GDP over the past few years is a sign that companies are becoming more deliberate and careful in their capital allocation.

Part of this decline in GDP, stemming from the oil production shortfall, will probably be made back sometime in the third quarter, but the net effect on the level of GDP over time will depend on the pace of rebuilding, which at present is difficult to foresee.

We anticipate that resource exports will add about a cumulative 1.2 percentage points to GDP over the next two years.

Our models project a 2 % plunge in real GDP over the coming year, which historically is a deep recession.

This of course is a huge transfer, and can easily explain most of the decline in the household share of GDP over this period.

Labor market growth was viewed as consistent with above - trend growth of GDP over the previous two quarters.

At longer horizons, the 6.3 % growth rate that we've assumed for nominal GDP over the coming years will begin to bail investors out given enough time, and as a result, our projection for 10 - year S&P 500 nominal total returns peeks its head up above zero, at about 2.4 % annually from current levels.

On all the available information, resources sector investment will probably rise by another 2 percentage points or more of annual GDP over the next couple of years.

Overall, PDFP rose 2.2 percent over the past four quarters, above the 1.2 - percent growth in GDP over the same period.»

Overview of federal tax receipts: the composition of federal tax revenues, the income distribution of tax shares and liability, and the changes in total tax burden and as a percentage of GDP over time.

«Although the PMI has not been a perfect guide to GDP over recent quarters, that suggests that the euro - zone economy probably barely expanded in Q4, if at all,» said Jonathan Loynes, chief European economist at Capital Economics.

New Zealand had a debt / GDP over 90 percent from 1946 - 1951.

In their data set, there are 110 years of data available for countries that have a debt / GDP over 90 percent, but they only use 96 of those years.

«We're in a very positive situation economically, with more Canadians working, with a strong level of growth, and we'll continue to have an approach to fiscal conservatism that shows a declining debt - to - GDP over time,» said Morneau.

Not exact matches

For example, if the second quarter GDP is up 3, percent this means that the economy has grown by 3 percent over the first quarter.

Tightening of monetary policy meant to cool the housing market over the past year, combined with a wind - down in public works, has served to slow GDP growth into the single digits.

For year over year GDP growth, «real GDP» is usually used, as it gives a more accurate view of the economy.

The plummeting price of clean energy has allowed the US to decrease its carbon emissions over the last three years while the country's GDP has increased.

These riches were at least as important to the Eritrean government as they were to Nevsun: by various estimates Bisha would provide about US$ 1 billion in royalties and revenues over its life, and raise the country's annual GDP by several percentage points.