And similarly for Hansen - style risks of GHG
GHE AGW CAGW.
The court will resume consideration of the theoretical, experimental, and observational evidence for the causal chain GHG
GHE AGW CAGW.
Not exact matches
-- which is irrelevant to the existence of the
GHE or increases due to
AGW drivers.
What we object to is the DEGREE with which the
GHE is caused by CO2, and the planet's reaction to any additional heat as claimed by the alramist
AGW faithful.
Arguments of benefit of CO2 are wildly dyskeptic, unproven, unbalanced and insufficient, by any standard falling below the claims of
GHE, or of GHI, or of
AGW, or of CAGW, or of any single paleo reconstruction such as tree ring proxies or even stomata.
The
AGW GHE begins with a lie, it has taken the figure for the Earth without any atmosphere at all of -18 ° C and given that to the Earth «without their version of greenhouse gases».
The context being the point I'm making that the Greenhouse Effect is built on science fraud by sleight of hand changes to real physics, the ideal gas / real gas is just one example — the real world around us is nothing like it is depicted in the
AGW GHE..
The reason you don't answer it is because you know that your arguments are against science and by doing it you, by yourself, will be demonstraring that
AGW and its
GHE are pseudoscience.
Which of course is involved in the
GHE which
AGW is an enhancement of.