Sentences with phrase «ghe hypothesis»

Maybe you could focus attention on devising a falsifiable GHE hypothesis involving CO2, rather than wasting time trying to convince people you're a scientist, involved in serious scientific work.

There is not even a single falsifiable GHE hypothesis (let alone one involving CO2), to be found.

Even worse, no one at all has managed to propose a falsifiable GHE hypothesis involving CO2.

I discovered there was no falsifiable GHE hypothesis at the link.

Still no falsifiable GHE hypothesis involving CO2, is there?

You can't provide a falsifiable GHE hypothesis involving CO2, so now you complain that people can't read it because it isn't there!

So you can't seem to find a useable falsifiable GHE hypothesis.

That's your CO2 fuelled GHE hypothesis?

As I said — no falsifiable GHE hypothesis to be see.

Produce a falsifiable GHE hypothesis involving CO2, and I'll consider it.

You can not even provide a testable GHE hypothesis.

A testable GHE hypothesis would be a good starting point, but alas, none such exists!

So any GHE hypothesis involving blankets is just plain silly.

They too have noticed a tendency for ad hominem comments to be preferred to factual rebuttal, giving the impression to an outside observer that no testable GHE hypothesis even exists.

Not exact matches

July 16, 2013 at 9:38 pm Well, it is also possible that the «GHE» hypothesis has a flaw; the allegedly «trapped» energy is simply delayed as it flows through the system (i.e. the Sun, Atmosphere, Surface, Atmosphere, Surface (again for a few quick trips) and finally onward to the «cold» expanse of space.

Well, it is also possible that the «GHE» hypothesis has a flaw; the allegedly «trapped» energy is simply delayed as it flows through the system (i.e. the Sun, Atmosphere, Surface, Atmosphere, Surface (again for a few quick trips) and finally onward to the «cold» expanse of space.

We have far, far more data than HadCRUT4, and the remaining possible degrees of freedom on the «Reject GHE» hypothesis is vanishingly tiny.

That depth of development, and the way climate science and the GHE has been subject to strong selective pressure in the ecology of scientific hypothesis for over a century and come out on top, makes me see those still rejecting its findings as the conceptual equals of those who refuse to accept the unity of terrestrial biology.

The fairly solid hypothesis of a slightly enhanced GHE from GHG emissions was / is being twisted into something more akin to a disaster flick in search of a disaster.

Sadly, the climate science community has been on a multi-decadal quest for proof of the «GHE» hypothesis, last I checked they are pointing towards the «deep oceans» as the location of their prey.

They have a hypothesis (among other hypotheses), but the climate science community hypothesis (the «GHE») does not match the observations.