To create more international consistency and transparency in the way
the GHG effects of policies and actions are estimated
Not exact matches
... they caution that society should fully quantify direct and indirect
GHG emissions associated with energy alternatives and associated consequences prior to making
policy commitments that have long - term
effects on global forests; for they ominously warn «there is a substantial risk
of sacrificing forest integrity and sustainability for maintaining or even increasing energy production with no guarantee to mitigate climate change.»»
In order to provide a contribution, the study uses the IMPACT model to examine agriculture -
GHG emissions links and the
effects of policy and other changes on these links.
fernandoleanme — that's an interesting sidebar, since was Hansen was predicting the
effect of policy when he spoke to Congress, his prediction necessarily had to predict the relationship between
policy (emissions) and
GHG concentrations, and those predictions (like the dependent temperature prediction) turned out to be wrong.
To help users assess the
GHG effects of specific
policies and actions in an accurate, consistent, transparent, complete, and relevant way
The
policy issues are, what is the marginal
effect of human
GHG emissions, and is it worth trying to do something about it by restricting those emissions?
Our analysis
of the three major models used to set government
policies in the United States and Europe suggests that ethanol
policies in
effect are relying on decreases in food consumption to generate
GHG savings (1).
If we move to analysing how
GHG emissions
effects the probability and consequences
of sudden rapid climate changes, then that is a totally different analyses from climate science right through the
policy analysis.