Not exact matches
In the 1980's, greenhouse gas (
GHG)
emissions from human activity became a worldwide concern and are a possible cause of climatic changes.
Over the last 50 years, climate scientists have built an increasingly clear picture of how the greenhouse gas (
GHG)
emissions that arise
from human economic
activity are changing the Earth's climate.
For the case of climate change, Thagard and Findlay (2011) showed how the mainstream scientific position, namely that
GHG emissions from human economic
activities are causing the Earth to warm, is coherent and accounts for the available evidence.
While the Kyoto Protocol had already been set into place as the primary solution to climate change, the historian of science Stuart Weart marks the point at the year 2001 where climate scientists had actually reached a consensus that
human activity was warming the planet via
GHG emissions and land - use changes, the former largely
from fossil fuel use.
Greenhouse gas (
GHG)
emissions from human activity and livestock are a significant driver of climate change, trapping heat in the earth's atmosphere and triggering global warming.
Regardless of the unbounded ethical duties derived
from imperfect obligations, if the climate change causing
activities of some people are violating the
human rights of others by interfering with life, health, or basic security, among other things, protected by
human rights, a case can be made that those who can make reductions in
GHG emissions targets that are nevertheless interfering with the rights of others should take steps to prevent
human rights violations even if they are complying with just allocations.
The scientific consensus is that greenhouse gas (
GHG)
emissions from human agricultural and industrial
activity are the principal cause of this global warming [1]--[3] and that such
emissions must be severely curtailed to prevent further anthropogenic disruption of the climate system [4].