The bounds in West Antarctica (loss of between 128 and 103 Gt / yr) reflect a much smaller
GIA uncertainty together with a much small surface area.
Not exact matches
Despite the better fit to observations in our
GIA model, significant
uncertainties remain.
Choice of
GIA correction is critical in the trends for the local and regional sea levels, introducing up to 8 mm · yr − 1
uncertainties for individual tide gauge records, up to 2 mm · yr − 1 for regional curves and up to 0.3 — 0.6 mm · yr − 1 in global sea level reconstruction.
GIA creates
uncertainty in sea - level reconstructions based on shoreline geological data [65], which could be reduced via appropriately distributed field studies.
The amounts of SLR,
GIA, steric expansion, ice cap melting and other factors are subject to individual
uncertainty, cumulative
uncertainty and continuous revision.