Both NOAAv4.01 and
GISSTEMP show almost identical changes in mean GMST to that per HadCRUT4v4 from 1880 - 1899, the first two decades they cover, to 1995 - 2015...
Both NOAAv4.01 and
GISSTEMP show almost identical changes in mean GMST to that per HadCRUT4v4 from 1880 - 1899, the first two decades they cover, to 1995 - 2015, the final period used in the update of Lewis and Curry.
An analysis of the figures will show why — NASA
GISSTEMP shows a warming trend since 2000, whereas HADCRUT3 does not.
Not exact matches
Looking at the inset (
showing the 5 - year averages), it looks to me like UAH is doing the «diverging», from HadCru, RSS, and
GISSTEMP.
Among all the main land based records (NOAA,
GISSTEMP, HADCRUT4, C&W) and the two satellite records, over the duration of the pause, UAH
shows the largest warming trend and RSS the lowest.
GISStemp and Hadcrut
show a 25 yr trend of 0.19 and 0.18 per decade which appear to be slightly lower than Scenario C (which are about.1 deg C lower than in 2007).
And then you DEMAND that everyone here at WattsUpWIthThat must not critisize the NASA Tsurf product Even after I have
showed you that NASA
gisstemp has it on their very front page still.
said replying to my post «I seem to remember seeing somewhere an archival thing
showing GISSTEMP with a high 1998 El Nino, just like everyone else.
I seem to remember seeing somewhere an archival thing
showing GISSTEMP with a high 1998 El Nino, just like everyone else.