Game criticism doesn't flow as naturally from film criticism as film criticism did from literary criticism.
Not exact matches
Once again that
game proved we
do not have a natural lw which is why our on gets exposed and mineral takes all the
criticism.
Wenger is aware of the doubters, but doesn't think any of this will affect the squad ahead of tomorrows difficult visit to high - flying Swansea, in fact he seems to expect
criticism whatever he
does during
games.
one of his biggest
criticism is that he doesn't show up in big
games and doesn't perform.
The old
criticism that Arsenal don't turn up against the big teams has been blown out of the water once again as the Gunners cruised without fear for most of the
game against Man City.
Most of us were on Wenger's case until very recently seeing that we didn't understand what his overall
game plan [on and off the pitch] was and we had good reason to doubt him but at least the
criticisms were meant to be of a constructive nature but I fail to understand folks who come on here to spew bile even when things are finally looking up for once in a very long while.
One of the
criticisms that some Arsenal fans have had of Arsene Wenger for years is that the Frenchman
did not appear to have a plan B, tactically speaking, or that he was just too set on Arsenal playing the fluent and entertaining sort of passing
game that we have become famous for under the prof.
I get the
criticisms, I truly
do, but a lot of fans blindly deny the fact that he
does score goals for us, and highlight his drought at the end of season as though that was the story of his season with us, neglecting the fact that before that he was scoring near on a goal a
game in a time where we desperately needed it to secure CL football when it was in no way guaranteed..
One of the
criticisms that some Arsenal fans have had of Arsene Wenger for years is that the Frenchman
did not appear to have a plan B, tactically speaking, or that he was just too set on Arsenal playing the fluent and entertaining sort of passing
game that we have become famous for under the prof.... Read the full article here
We don't know whether this
criticism became a self - fulfilling prophecy as Giroud's confidence took a knock and he went on to fail to score in 15
games in a row, which effectively ended Arsenal's chances of winning the title.
Speaking to Sky Sports after the
game, Neville
did not hold back in his
criticism of Lukaku's performance, warning him that at a club like United he needs to produce more in big
games such as this one.
This dude purports to have watched every
game Mayfield has ever played, and claims to have
done additional tape study, and the entire list of
criticisms he can come up with are he's short, he has possible personal issues, and he played in a playground offense?
Criticisms fair if you analyse someone's
game and point out the good and the bad I don't mind hearing people say this player needs to improve on certain aspects of the
game but all he
does is slam everyone.
As long as he can keep improving his work rate and more involvement in
games like he has been
doing since he has been back then my
criticism ends.
In turn, he finally
did what many supporters have been demanding for weeks in terms of resting players and rotating to give others an opportunity, and yet he still somehow earned
criticism after the
game.
Based on his performance, I agree with a lot of the
criticism that he
does get as you can't be a team player if you only want to play one type of
game which suits yourself and is within your comfort zone.
Criticism of a player or manager is ok but I don't agree with fans saying a player should be sold because of a bad
game.
He also thinks that Wenger doesn't take any notice of the
criticism although he has looked frustrated at time himself, especially when an away fan tried to put up a banner at the Everton
game!
The French striker will come under
criticism for his two efforts which were both placed off target, but the fact that he managed to create the space and get into the right position to get those chances is more than PEA
did at any point of the
game.
There has been a lot of unfair
criticism of Theo of recent, in my opinion, but his proven productivity when on form and especially his performances in the big
games — Theo
does well in the big
games — justifies Wenger's continued faith in him.
Outside
criticisms and rumblings in the community didn't last long though, as the Grizzlies overcame tremendous adversity to win three straight
games and reach the playoffs for the 18th - straight season.
Criticism is part of the sport — all you can
do is focus on being the best you can be in the next
game.
Arsenal legend Martin Keown added to that
criticism before the
game against Borisov, and told the Daily Mail: «I don't think Wenger can completely trust him any more.»
I remember your constant
criticism just before the Munich away
game last season, it was once assumed you were a chelsea fan, not sure that is true but you definitely are a cock.I don't know whow you watch your
games but after every poor referee performance against Arsenal you always seem to make an excuse for the referee but never one for Arsenal.i find your comments so boring, the same after every poor result that I wonder if you are just a copy and paste merchant and have only ever made 5 different comments
Since I didn't make a long list of every good and bad thing I thought Wenger
did in this
game, but instead chose to focus on a couple of
criticisms I had, you infer from that that I think he
did nothing right?
Furthermore, City seem to have an ability to «up their
game» when hosting the top sides; not one of the «top six» has beaten them at St. Andrew's for 18 months, a record Arsenal will need to break if they
do not want to receive similar
criticism as before the Chelsea
game.
Roberto Martinez has been coming under increased
criticism from supporters and the
game against Saints will have
done little to ease that.
«He would show up at the
games but there was never any
criticism of how you
did.»
While it hasn't actually got any less advanced since the previous
game, it
does give that impression, having been watered down in response to
criticism that the original
game was too difficult.
My biggest
criticism of The Frozen Wilds is that the story
does not match the main
game.
There has been some
criticism that the
game does not feature co-op or multiplayer, however in this day and age where EVERYTHING has co-op and multiplayer I found it a refreshing change to have a
game I can just sit and play all on my
There has been some
criticism that the
game does not feature co-op or multiplayer, however in this day and age where EVERYTHING has co-op and multiplayer I found it a refreshing change to have a
game I can just sit and play all on my own in peace.
I honestly don't get the huge
criticism that this
game gets.
Video
game criticism, as a form, just doesn't exist.
In fact, the
game is so deep that the only other
criticism I have of it (apart from the camera) is that the developers
do not provide the player with enough detailed information.
Koinuma's response to my
criticism was along the lines of «it's a fair cop, guv», but he stressed Omega Force's approach to the Warriors series doesn't leave much room for the kinds of showy graphics less ambitious action
games can manage.
That said, a common
criticism of the
game is that it is perhaps too simplistic and hasn't
done enough to existing PvZ formula.
The fact this
game plays to the casual market doesn't exclude it from
criticism and there are a couple of key concerns I have.
Although Nintendo has gotten
criticism for their use of bringing Wii U
games to the Switch, I don't think it's a bad idea.
At the same time, this is one of the strongest
criticism that has been directed at the
game, as it's possible to just let the AI
do all the dirty battle work without any input from the player.
One of the big
criticisms last year was that the controller's cords were too short, and there was a way to add more
games onto the console that obviously Nintendo
did not intend to happen.
Walsh was also seen as far more respectful in his
criticisms of
games, often singling out parents in his report cards for failing to
do their part.
Yes, devs pour a lot of work into their
games, but that
does not make them immune from
criticism, ESPECIALLY from people paying them money for a product.
So, let's talk
criticisms; for obvious reasons I'm not going to complain about the patchy performance or balancing because those will all have changed by time Early Access hits, but I
do want to chat about the developers are going to handle new players coming into the
game.
After posting my opinion piece where I defended Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, I quickly received much
criticism for essentially
doing what I set out to try and oust: Battlefield 3 fanboyism, or at least trying to silence the people who bashed the
game for being terrible and a milking of the franchise while singing praise of its rival.
Game criticism is being crushed between a community that will downcall anything that doesn't agree with it, and publishers that can keep journalists in their back pocket.
Or maybe not everyone was gushing with praise about Uncharted, and
criticisms of the
game are just as valid as any other opinion even if they don't align with your own?
So what you're saying is that any
criticism (even entirely valid ones, like the fact that the story in this
game blew) is «idiotic» if you don't agree with it.
And your talking about raging and tanterms, I have been cool and looked it from all sides, and tried to give
criticism in a civil way, or at least I thought I had... I have never kicked anything over lol, and I'm actually still playing the
game, the
game in itself is the best I've ever played and I just don't understand the last 20 - 30 minutes and I've read so many articles, if I would have been able to understand the ending (like many others) I doubt it would have even been a issue.
At this juncture in time it seems almost redundant to criticise the Lego
games for failing to innovate or change very much in the formula, and yet it
does remain a true and valid
criticism, so here we go; LEGO The Hobbit plays it safe, refining a couple of areas and adding a few new little mechanics, while infuriatingly still failing to fix problems that have plagued the series for years.