Sentences with phrase «gavin schmidts»

I know I've asked this question before back in december and said that gavin was the only one who could clear it up.
For the posters here who visit gavin's Real Climate site.
I thought gavin Schmidt comment to Andy Revkin summed up matters:
Dr Curry — as your post quotes quite an amount of text published at real Climate and then goes on to discuss that (including paryicluar points to gavin and rasmus), why didn't you post over there?
At the RC post, rasmus and gavin state:
When did you last speak to gavin about this PRECISE POINT?
I will say this for Betts, his forays into the world of the sceptics is not so blatantly obnoctious as gavin eta
In gavin's (sic) current post, while he can not bring himself to include a direct link to Climateaudit, instead he links (via «inactivists») to a Google search whose top find is CA!
gavin asked my agenda when I proposed looking at the temperature record again.
Start at the World Glacier Monitoring Service or UNEP — gavin]
Posted in Other Advocates, Research Blogging, tagged AGU, ben santer, bill mckibben, climate change, education, environment, gavin schmidt, global warming, james hansen, john cook, michael mann, michael tobis, physics today, richard sommerville, science, skeptical science, stephen schneider, susan joy hassol on December 12, 2011 2 Comments»
Posted in Interviews, tagged agriculture, climate change, economy, education, gavin schmidt, global warming, hurricanes, media, science, sea level rise, uncertainty on October 18, 2011 16 Comments»
gavin's home is wonderful.
gavin is a very accommodating host and we had a great stay.
## COMPARE TO GAVIN PLOT par (mar = c (3,3,2,1)-RRB- plot (c (time (hansen88)-RRB-, hansen88 -LSB-,» Scenario.A»], col = 2, ylim = c -LRB--.25, 1.5), xlim = c (1958,2010), xlab =»», ylab =»», tcl =.25, axes = FALSE) box -LRB--RRB-; axis (side = 1, tcl =.25); axis (side = 2, las = 1, font = 2) lines (c (time (hansen88)-RRB-, hansen88 -LSB-,» Scenario.A»], col = 2, lwd = 2) lines (c (time (hansen88)-RRB-, hansen88 -LSB-,» Scenario.B»], col =» green4 ″, lwd = 2) points (c (time (hansen88)-RRB-, hansen88 -LSB-,» Scenario.B»], col =» green4 ″, pch = 1) lines (c (time (hansen88)-RRB-, hansen88 -LSB-,» Scenario.C»], col = 4, lwd = 2) points (c (time (hansen88)-RRB-, hansen88 -LSB-,» Scenario.C»], col = 4, pch = 1) lines (c (time (giss.glb)-RRB-, giss.glb, col =» grey60 ″, lwd = 2) points (c (time (giss.glb)-RRB-, giss.glb, col =» grey60 ″, pch = 19) lines (c (time (spaghetti)-RRB-, spaghetti -LSB-,» tlt3.glb»], col = 1, lwd = 3) points (c (time (spaghetti)-RRB-, spaghetti -LSB-,» tlt3.glb»], col = 1, pch = 19) abline (v = 1987, lty = 3, col =» grey80 ″) abline (h = seq (0,1.5,.5), col =» grey80 ″, lty = 2) legend (1958,1.6, fill = c (2,3,4,» grey60 ″, 1), legend = c («Hansen A»,» Hansen B»,» Hansen C»,» GISS Surf»,» RSS Sat»)-RRB- title (main =» Hansen et al 1988 Projections»)
I suggested to rosie that there are means by which she can take care of her existantialist angst needless to say - i have zero expectaion that my comment will be posted there by gavin / eric
-- gavin] Geological records of the Equatorial Pacific would suggest that the frequency and possibly the amplitude of the ENSO oscillations are indeed independent of the climate change.
So gavin, perhaps we could benefit from a lesson in arctic ice formation and decay and the various causes — wind stress, temperature, albedo, soot, salinity, wave roughness, leads, pressure ridges, etc etc etc..
See the exaplantion why here — gavin]
-- gavin] What worries me — to the point of actually rising the issue — is not only the spread of the results — but the fact that they depend so much on the models and the starting data.
Same with your other pop «fingerprints» — gavin]
You're the best gavin.
Not sure what we are supposed to conclude from this though... — gavin]
A minor correction to my previous post (# 34): I was unaware of the blog that gavin linked to.
[Response: Scientists have looked at this repeatedly — and the other drivers don't appear to be playing much of a role — whereas the GHGs give a lot of what we see (warm troposphere, cool stratosphere etc.)-- gavin]
-- gavin][Response: Whether it is significant or not depends on the uncertainties (which you neglect to mention).
Possibly it's worth pointing out that even above Svalbard you could have sailed past 82 N in ice free conditions last year, and approaching from Siberia, you could have gone to past 84 N. — gavin]
What was the actual outcome gavin?
-- gavin] Yes and no: Yes I am claiming that we do not know the system well enough.
The algorithms, issues and choices are outlined in excruciating detail in the relevant papers: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/references.html — gavin]
In the real world, forcings continued to increase after 2000, much closer to scenario B. — gavin
Might this be the reason why his question, as gavin puts it, «smacks of a desire to have lower trends for reasons that are not clear»?
Even Bill Gray uses SST in his hurricane forecasts... - gavin]
There are still a number of papers going through the works so we will probably wait for the dust to settle... - gavin]
gavin, I am interested in what an x feet (for various x) increase in sea level means as a reduction in actual global land area but perhaps more relevantly in the resultant increase / decrease in habitable land area (increased I imagine in Canada, Siberia, Antarctica etc).
An analysis of a coupled model's mass field variations would be a good start... — gavin]
[Response: For GISS the data you should be looking at is http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A4.txt - gavin]
I am assuming that the reference is really to the Cretaceous - Teritary (KT) boundary — the K comes from the German spelling — gavin]
Response: see above (I had to photoshop since I don't have the original figure in a nice format)-- gavin
The odd circular reference deleted by gavin in 207 was my reference to a commentary at: http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/index.html
I'm not sure that they provide updates in real time... — gavin]
It just doesn't work that way... — gavin]
[As gavin said in his answer to # 57 above «Almost all of the northward flow is associated with the relatively shallow GS on the western side of basin.»]
As a more extreme example, Judith Curry «summarizes» extensively her thoughts on the Montford Hockey Stick book (comment 168) and then backs off and says none of it was actually her opinion, just her summary, after gavin calls her out on the nonsense (comment here).
If it's radically different, I'd be surprised. - gavin]
and thanks for your (and gavin's) efforts in facilitating jbob's posting that graph.
-- gavin] Isn't it temperature in Centigrade that is originally measured by the ARGO floats?
[Response: The original paper is available at http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/shared/articles/mbh98.pdf - gavin]
The Response by gavin says: «I note that we linked to the NOAA NHC summary which claims that everything is a natural long term cycle»,...
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z