Sentences with phrase «general agricultural workers»

The General Secretary of the General Agricultural Workers Union (GAWU), Edward Karaweh has described Nana Akufo - Addo's «one dam one village» policy as a sign of underdevelopment.

Not exact matches

Given that the purpose of the Bill was to protect Welsh agricultural workers after the UK Government scrapped that protection, it is disappointing that the Attorney General has referred the Bill to the Supreme Court.

In Zimbabwe, the General Agricultural and Plantation Workers Union of Zimbabwe (GAPWUZ), protects laborers from abuse.

The majority held that the Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002, («AEPA») which excluded agricultural workers from the Labour Relations Act («LRA») following Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016 did not violate s. 2 (d) of Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002, («AEPA») which excluded agricultural workers from the Labour Relations Act («LRA») following Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016 did not violate s. 2 (d) of agricultural workers from the Labour Relations Act («LRA») following Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016 did not violate s. 2 (d) of the Charter.

The majority held that the Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002, («AEPA») which excluded agricultural workers from the Labour Relations Act («LRA») following Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016 did not violate s. 2 (d) of the ChartAgricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002, («AEPA») which excluded agricultural workers from the Labour Relations Act («LRA») following Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016 did not violate s. 2 (d) of the Chartagricultural workers from the Labour Relations Act («LRA») following Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016 did not violate s. 2 (d) of the Charter... [more]

In Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, the SCC ruled Ontario's Agricultural Employees Protection Act did not violate charter rights because it mandated employers to negotiate «in good faith» with their employees, despite the fact that the law does not protect the right of agricultural workers to strike or bargain cAgricultural Employees Protection Act did not violate charter rights because it mandated employers to negotiate «in good faith» with their employees, despite the fact that the law does not protect the right of agricultural workers to strike or bargain cagricultural workers to strike or bargain collectively.

In Dunmore v Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94 at para 169, Justice L'Heureux - Dubé, in a concurring judgment, held that agricultural workers were generally disadvantaged and should be seen as a protected group under s. 15 (1).

However, the strength of this argument is weakened by Ontario (Attorney General) v Fraser, 2011 SCC 20 at para 295, where Justices Rothstein and Charron, writing concurring reasons, did not accept that occupational status as an agricultural worker was a protected ground on the record before them.

Attorney General Ferguson and his team of remarkable attorneys have successfully defended the rights of LGBTQ people to fair and non-discriminatory treatment, challenged the Administration's unlawful ban on Muslim travelers, and challenged sex - segregated hiring practices and sexual harassment of women workers by a large agricultural packing house.

Ten years later, in Ontario (Attorney General) v Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 SCR 3, the Court considered the constitutionality of labour relations legislation specifically targeted at agricultural workers.