The last completed paper set of bound volumes of
general committee proceedings are for the 2006/07 session; no more will be produced.
Not exact matches
«In view of the facts alleged in this report, which include bribery allegations, Fifa secretary
general Jerome Valcke, in compliance with article 16 of the Fifa code of ethics, yesterday requested the Fifa ethics
committee to open ethics
proceedings.»
It shall be a part of the business of these
general meetings to receive the Address of the President of the last meeting; to hear such reports on scientific subjects as, from their
general importance and interests, the Standing
Committee shall elect; also to receive from the chairman of the Sections abstracts of the
proceedings of their respective Sections; and to listen to communications and lectures explanatory of new and important discoveries and researches in science, and new inventions and processes in the arts.
«In Hickerton v Child Support Agency [2006] EWHC 61 (Fam) I drew attention to the fact that last year the Family Procedure Rules
Committee considered the
general question of routes of appeal in family
proceedings... I continued at para [32]: «The key requirement, as the
Committee put it, and I wholeheartedly agree, is that the appeal system must be clear, coherent and as simple as possible for the litigant to understand and operate.
«(i) that in matters of personal conduct he would be subject to the hospital's
general procedures and that in matters of professional conduct he would be subject to a procedure agreed by the Local Negotiating
Committee in respect of medical practitioners; (ii) that he was accused by the Trust of personal and professional misconduct; (iii) that because of the nature of the allegations made against him he was contractually entitled to a formal disciplinary hearing by a panel which included a clinician of the same discipline as himself and a legally qualified chairman, before which he would have the benefit of legal representation, if he so wished; (iv) that the disciplinary hearing which resulted in the findings of misconduct was not conducted in accordance with the terms of his contract of employment because the panel did not include a clinician of the same discipline as himself, nor a legally qualified chairman and because his request to be allowed legal representation was refused; (iv) that following the panel's findings he was dismissed for personal and professional misconduct; (v) that if the
proceedings had been carried out in accordance with his contract of employment the panel would not have found that he was guilty of personal and professional misconduct and he would not have been dismissed; (vii) that because he was dismissed on the grounds of personal and professional misconduct (including dishonesty) he has been unable to find comparable alternative employment» [at para 10]:
As well, it noted that in the Federal Court
proceedings, there are huge conflicts for the federal attorney
general meaning «there is no voice in defence of the process and an inquiry
committee's role in it.