Sentences with phrase «general court began»

Not exact matches

The state Office of General Services will perform renovation work on the Empire State Plaza concourse food court beginning June 27, resulting in the relocation of some vendors and temporary closure of others, the agency announced.

A state courts inspector general is probing one of Queens Rep. Joe Crowley's top lieutenants after The NY Post began asking about possible rules violations.

The Supreme Court in June 2017, ordered the Auditor General to, with immediate effect; begin surcharging persons found to have misappropriated monies belonging to the state.

The Attorney General on Thursday November 26, failed to appear in court for the beginning of the appeal case against the High Court judgment that freed businessman, Alfred Woyome of any wrongdoing in the Ghc 51 million judgment debt scacourt for the beginning of the appeal case against the High Court judgment that freed businessman, Alfred Woyome of any wrongdoing in the Ghc 51 million judgment debt scaCourt judgment that freed businessman, Alfred Woyome of any wrongdoing in the Ghc 51 million judgment debt scandal.

The Supreme Court has ordered the Auditor General to, with immediate effect, begin surcharging persons found to have misappropriated monies belonging to the state.

A state courts inspector general has launched an investigation into one of Rep. Joe Crowley's top lieutenants after The Post began asking about two possible violations of court rules.

37 Thanks in part to multiple court orders and strong federal enforcement, school districts began to implement racial integration policies.38 From the 1960s through the 1980s, there was a general growth in school district integration as an increasing number of states and districts heeded Brown's mandate and created bussing policies and magnet schools that joined black and white students across neighborhood boundaries.

«The Court is uncertain if it is common practice for attorneys general to begin to investigate a company after reading an article that accuses a company of possibly committing wrongdoing decades ago,» Kinkeade wrote.

My role as an «Admin Vollie» began as a one day a week commitment (which became one day a fortnight once I commenced at the Ipswich court) and involves undertaking general administrative tasks such as filing, collecting mail and confirming appointments.

As discussed abundantly in previous posts, numerous court systems worldwide have begun harnessing the power of modern technology in general (and online dispute resolution (ODR) mechanisms in particular) due to the many benefits it stands to offer to the judiciary.

It was as if the Judges had their constitutional law text books out beside them: the Court began by identifying the existence of a «legitimate aim in the general interest».

The Supreme Court's 1980 decision in British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Ellett Estate27 marks the true beginning of the living tree revolution, and with it, the fundamental mischaracterization of Edwards.

More important, as the years passed, a scattering of lower courts across the country began to recognize an in - house law firm privilege that covered all communications between firm lawyers and law firm General Counsel, or recognized only narrow exceptions.

Accordingly, in the light of the facts of the present case, and having held in paragraphs 170 and 171 of the judgment under appeal, that the successful bid did not originate from a candidate who had participated autonomously in the tendering procedure from the beginning of that procedure, the General Court was correct in holding, in paragraph 174 of that judgment, that the requirement of an open and transparent procedure had not been observed (C - 127 / 16 P, paras 66 - 69, references omitted).

The recent litigation in Canada regarding production orders that were issued before the amendment to s. 487.012 began with R v Telus Communications Co., [2013] 2 SCR 3 where the Supreme Court of Canada held that a general warrant under s. 487.01 of the Code could not be used to compel a telecommunication company to provide prospective text messages to the police.

The history of the Court began with section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867, which allowed Parliament to establish a «General Court of Appeal for Canada».

The Oregon court began by noting that under the state's recreational use statute, a landowner who opens up his land for the recreational use of the general public is not generally liable for injuries sustained by the public.

Upon moving to Texas, Ms. Mapes was admitted to the State Bar of Texas, and began practicing with a general practice law firm in Grand Prairie, where she familiarized herself with the courts in Tarrant and Dallas Counties.

He began his legal career as a judicial law clerk to Judge Maurice Louik in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Civil Division, doing civil jury and nonjury trial work and general practice, including divorce work in the Family Divisions and Domestic Relations sections of Western Pennsylvania.

«Panel Grills Gonzales Over Spy Program»: The Associated Press provides a report that begins, «Senators demanded details Thursday from Attorney General Alberto Gonzales about new orders putting the government's domestic spying program under court review — and questioned why it took so long to do so.

After a false start through criminal charges against two men (see Blackmore v. British Columbia (Attorney General) 2009 BCSC 1299, the province began a reference in the B.C. Supreme Court under the Constitutional Question Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 68, s. 1, asking:

Ontario's Ministry of the Attorney General abandoned a $ 10.3 million overhaul of its court record system in 2013, but last August, the province began allowing residents to file electronically at a handful of small claims courts in Brampton, Oshawa, Ottawa and Richmond Hill.

In this case, the Court would begin by underlining that prisoners in general continue to enjoy all the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed under the Convention save for the right to liberty, where lawfully imposed detention expressly falls within the scope of Article 5 of the Convention.

I started out as a general assignment reporter in South Carolina and that's where I began covering courts and politics in a big region near Florence, South Carolina.

Although the Court began with the general rule from Duke v Andler, after reviewing the four - part test in Catania, the Court determined that it had jurisdiction to grant the wife exclusive possession of the property in Osoyoos and, in fact, granted exclusive possession of the property in Osoyoos to the wife.

Beginning on January 16, 2015, Mono County Court Clerks will no longer be able to provide assistance by telephone to the general public.

The Attorney General officially began looking into «improper documentation» filed by these law firms in Florida court records that ``... may have been created and -LSB-...]