Sentences with phrase «general court granted»

The Massachusetts General Court granted them permission to settle in the towns of Windsor, Wethersfield, and Hartford which is an area now known as Connecticut.

22 By orders of 20 July 2016, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the General Court granted Monsanto and Pioneer leave to intervene.

Not exact matches

The court on June 8 granted a request by the Attorney - General's department to question the businessman on whether he owns properties, has the means of offsetting the debt owed the state as well as how he spent the 51.2 million cedis wrongfully paid him.

Following delays in retrieving the money, Supreme Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the sCourt judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the scourt's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the state.

An Accra High Court has granted an order for the Police to seize electronic gadgets belonging to the embattled General Secretary of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) Koku Anyidoho which are believed to be storage of information related to treason.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted an application by former Attorney General to orally examine Alfred Woyome over his payment of the 51 million cedis judgement debt paid him by the state.

According to Abidogun who is also the Solicitor General said the AGF will assume office on Wednesday andwill be briefed on the Dasuki's court action between Thursday and Friday and urged the court to grant them permission to appear in the court next Monday.

The Supreme Court in 2014 ordered Mr. Woyome to pay back the money as Supreme Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the sCourt in 2014 ordered Mr. Woyome to pay back the money as Supreme Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the sCourt judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the scourt's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the state.

This is just as the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Mr. Abubakar Matami (SAN) failed to appear before the Court to explain the siege laid on the Asokoro residence of the former National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Mohammed Dasuki (rtd) by operatives of the State Security Services (SSS) in spite of the bail granted him by the cCourt to explain the siege laid on the Asokoro residence of the former National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Mohammed Dasuki (rtd) by operatives of the State Security Services (SSS) in spite of the bail granted him by the courtcourt.

The state Appellate Division — which ruled in March that state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's fraud suit can go forward against Donald Trump's defunct «school» and the candidate himself — granted Trump permission to appeal its ruling to the state Court of Appeals.

The court presided over by Mrs Mary Nsenkyire granted a request by the prosecution to allow the Attorney General's Department to have a copy of the docket.

Lawyers from the attorney general's office filed an intervening motion in federal court late Monday asking Judge Gary Sharpe to grant more time in compling with a federal law mandating an early primary in New York.

The Supreme Court (SC) of Ghana has granted a request by former Attorney General, Martin Amidu to allow him cross examine businessman Alfred Agbesi Woyome.

The Supreme Court has granted the wish of former Attorney General, Martin Amidu to orally examine beleaguered businessman Alfred Agbeshi Woyome over the GHC51 million judgment debt and related issues.

; Patrick Akpolobolokemi, the former NIMASA Director - General was rough - handled and bundled into a van right in front of the court premises where a judge had just granted him bail; several persons are known to have been detained for periods far in excess of the constitutionally mandated 48 hours initially under spurious detention orders signed by magistrates courts in the Federal Capital Territtory!

An FCT High Court sitting in Jabi on Thursday granted leave to the Inspector - General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Idris to appeal a ruling on...

Probably, to give bite to the President's promise to deal with forces threatening the corporate survival of the country, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, has approached the Federal High Court for the revocation of the bail granted the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, by Justice Binta Murtala Nyako of the same court, last ACourt for the revocation of the bail granted the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, by Justice Binta Murtala Nyako of the same court, last Acourt, last April.

Following delays in retrieving the money, the Supreme Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the sCourt judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the scourt's judgment ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the state.

The Attorney General granted his consent because he concluded that it was in the interests of justice for the application for a new inquest to go forward and to be heard by the High Court.

The family of Private Cheryl James, 18, who was found with gunshot wounds, has been granted permission by the attorney general, Dominic Grieve, to seek a fresh inquest at the high court.

Following delays in retrieving the money, Supreme Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the sCourt judges unanimously granted the Attorney General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the scourt's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the state.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday, November 16, granted former Attorney General, Martin Amidu, the permission to orally examine businessman, Alfred Agbesi Woyome, in the controversial GHc51 million judgment debt case.

Meanwhile, a court order obtained by DAILY POST, indicated that an Ilesa high court division, presided over by Justice Lateef Adegoke had on January 25, 2017 granted a motion ex-parte restraining one Chief Segun Omoyelu, Mr Austin Achika, Police Area Commander, Area M, Commissioner of Police Lagos State, and the Inspector General of police from harassing or detaining Osunbuyi and Busuyi Fanibi

The Federal District Court granted the defendant summary judgment, ruling that plaintiff's evidence did not meet a standard of «general acceptance» within the scientific community.

In the 1999 Booth decision, the Colorado Supreme Court rejected the Denver board's position, finding that the constitution's grant of «general supervision» over public education to the state board was broad enough to encompass the power to approve local charter schools.

Alexandria, Va. (February 1, 2016)-- The National School Boards Association (NSBA) applauds the recent Nevada District Court decision granting a preliminary injunction in the case of Lopez v. Schwartz, halting the state's Education Savings Account Program (ESAP), that would divert general funds appropriated for public schools to fund private school tuition.

In Georgia, the high court ruled May 16 that the 2008 law creating the Georgia Charter Schools Commission conflicted with a provision of the state constitution granting local boards of education «exclusive control» over general K - 12 schools.

From 2000 - 2006, Ron worked as a lawyer with FTA's General Law Division, handling Federal Court litigation, and issues related to transit security, transit finance, Federal grants, and FOIA.

On July 20, 2009, Spencer Capital Opportunity Fund, LP filed a lawsuit in Delaware pursuant to Section 211 (c) of the Delaware General Corporation Law requesting that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the «Chancery Court») order MRVC to hold its 2009 annual meeting of stockholders without delay and to grant other relief deemed appropriate by the Court.

In general, the last collection resort for lenders is filing a lawsuit and, if a court judgment is granted, the lender can garnish a portion of the debtor's wages, which may force an eventual bankruptcy filing.

Should a person deny the representative access to the premises, the attorney general could petition a court for an order granting access to such premises and records.

In its Judgment of 20 September 2012 in case T ‑ 154 / 10 French Republic vs. European Commission, the General Court of the EU (GC) has established a new test of «bankruptcy - proofness» as an advantage contrary to Article 107 (1) TFEU that may generate a significant shake up in the control of State aid granted (implicitly) to establishments of an industrial and commercial character (EICC, or EPIC in their French acronym)-- ie legal entities governed by public law which have distinct legal personality from the State, financial independence and certain special powers, including the performance of one or more public service tasks.

• Britt Grant of the Georgia Supreme Court, a former Georgia solicitor general and a former partner at Kirkland & Ellis.

In April 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada decided to grant the federal Attorney - General's application for leave to appeal the ruling of the BC Court of Appeal in SWUAV v AG Canada.

The Court found that the interpretation of insurance contracts involves a unique blend of the general principles of interpretation applicable to all contracts and the unique principles applicable in the insurance setting.22 While courts have found that the «language of the policy» is the most important factor in determining whether coverage is granted or excluded, courts have found that where there is genuine ambiguity or doubt, the duty to defend ought to be resolved in favour of the insured.23 Similarly other insurance law principles should be considered, such as the principle that coverage provisions should be construed broadly and exclusion clauses should be construed narrowly.24 It was this last principle that the Court looked to in making a decision in this case.

However, in unanimous decision, the appeal court upheld the argument of the counsel to the Attorney - General of the Federation, Chief Emeka Ngige (SAN) that Justice Abang was held in error in granting some of the injunctive reliefs sought by Kashamu upon inadmissible evidence.

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal in Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society and ordered the minister of health to grant an immediate exemption to the safe injection facility.

The General Court's suggestion that the instrument used for the assessment of compatibility should be the one in force at the time the contract was originally granted indeed, as pointed out by AG Wathelet, does not fully reflect the nature of State aid.

This test reflects the general requirement under Supreme Court Act 1981, s 37, that interim orders only be granted if the court considers it «just and convenient» to dCourt Act 1981, s 37, that interim orders only be granted if the court considers it «just and convenient» to dcourt considers it «just and convenient» to do so.

But for the past 30 years, we've taken for granted that we can also offer the benefit of all these European instruments and that English judgments will be enforceable across the EU — and as soon as those are stripped back, one may need to consider the balance between the general reputation of English courts and English law and the fact that we may need to say to clients that it may potentially become harder to enforce your debt overseas in the EU.

The general approach had to be that courts should be «exceedingly slow» to grant an injunction to restrain publication where the applicant had not satisfied the court that he would probably, or «more likely than not», succeed at trial (Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2004] UKHL 44).

Accordingly, the General Court held that the Council and Commission had erred in the process of making the decision not to grant MET status to Xinanchem.

Prima facie, in a situation where on a general challenge a court had found a term or terms in a set of standard conditions in use in current contracts unfair, it had to be a proper exercise of its power to grant an injunction to prevent enforcement of that term or terms in existing contracts.

Quebec's Superior Court granted the attorney general's motion to dismiss.

The colonies were granted the ability to elect general assemblies under a royally appointed governor and high council, with the power to create laws and ordinances, as well as establish civil and criminal courts specific to the area and in agreement with British and colonial laws.

The Court granted review in one case and called for the views of the Solicitor General in two cases.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal found that they should be granted public interest standing to pursue this challenge; the Attorney General of Canada appeals.

Justice Martin was satisfied on the evidence provided that the applicant met the tests outlined by the Supreme Court in Carter vs. Canada (Attorney General) and granted the application.

In other words, granting Binyam Mohamed and his four co-defendants their day in court might result in official confirmation, or new revelations, of the CIA's relationship with Jeppesen; of the cooperation and complicity of foreign governments in rendition and torture; about the Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation program in general; and about the CIA's practices and methods — all matters which, our government insists and the narrowest of majorities of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agrees, «in the interests of national security should not be divulged.&rcourt might result in official confirmation, or new revelations, of the CIA's relationship with Jeppesen; of the cooperation and complicity of foreign governments in rendition and torture; about the Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation program in general; and about the CIA's practices and methods — all matters which, our government insists and the narrowest of majorities of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agrees, «in the interests of national security should not be divulged.&rCourt of Appeals agrees, «in the interests of national security should not be divulged.»

Given the above findings, the Court of Appeal then applied the test for granting an interlocutory injunction as set out in RJR Macdonald Inc. v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311.