Her practice is of an advisory, regulatory litigious nature and has included judicial review, actions for damages before UK courts, the superior courts of Ireland, specialized tribunals, the European Court of Justice and
General Court in cases concerning a wide range -LSB-...]
Her practice is of an advisory, regulatory litigious nature and has included judicial review, actions for damages before UK courts, the superior courts of Ireland, specialized tribunals, the European Court of Justice and
General Court in cases concerning a wide range internal market issues, ranging from public procurement to goods and services, energy, agriculture competition and social and employment law.
The General Court in case T - 18 / 10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council held that
This very issue was on display in the recent judgment of
the General Court in Case T - 851 / 16 Access Info Europe v Commission.
Not exact matches
«On a
general level, there can be practical barriers to pursuit of a criminal
case, such as the victim company's fear of embarrassment, reputational damage, or the perceived risk — real or not — that their trade secrets will be exposed
in a
court proceeding,» said Brooke French, shareholder at law firm Carlton Fields.
Last week, AARP and the State Attorneys
General of California, Oregon and New York filed separate motions to intervene
in the
case and seek rehearings
in front of the full
court, anticipating the DOL would not take action to defend its rule.
In the same article we reported that while the Citizens United
case was pending before the U.S. Supreme
Court, Virginia Thomas, the wife of the Justice, created a nonprofit Tea Party advocacy group, Liberty Central, Inc., with a former lawyer for the Charles G. Koch Foundation, Sarah Field, acting as her
General Counsel and a former Koch lobbyist, Matt Schlapp, serving on her board at inception.
The Federal
Court of Appeal recently affirmed this approach to environmental regulation
in a
case arising out of Alberta called Syncrude Canada Ltd. v Canada (Attorney
General).
Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and
general counsel, says that the company's lawyers plan to review all of the documents released by the F.B.I. to see what Hogan told the F.B.I. during the extortion investigation and whether that matches the testimony he's given
in his state
court case again Gawker.
One need not be a historian of education or a theologian to assess the damage done to public education and then to society
in general by how these
cases were decided and what public school officials were empowered to do (or so they believed) despite the clearly given cautions from the Supreme
Court itself.
David Howman, director
general of the World Anti-Doping Agency, called those
court's decisions
in the Caucchioli and Pellizotti
cases «a significant step
in the global fight against doping
in sport.»
In custody cases, most states» family courts allow a preference for the parent who can demonstrate that he or she was a child's primary caretaker during the course of marriage, or assumed that role in general if the parents are unmarrie
In custody
cases, most states» family
courts allow a preference for the parent who can demonstrate that he or she was a child's primary caretaker during the course of marriage, or assumed that role
in general if the parents are unmarrie
in general if the parents are unmarried.
By contrast, I have heard of
cases pertaining to some newer member states where the state
in question would not even send a representative or written arguments to the
court (here again I think it was about prejudicial questions, not infringement proceedings but it shows how specific countries approach EU litigation
in general).
He said the call became imperative
in view of a
case currently pending before the Supreme
Court between Lagos State Government Attorney
General and Attorney
General of the Federation.
The Code provides
in the same Rule that «A judge is permitted to make public statements (my emphasis)
in the course of his or her official duties or to explain for public information the procedure of the
court,
general legal principles, or what may be learned from the public record
in a
case.
Sixteen state attorneys
general — including New York's Eric Schneiderman — along with Washington D.C. filed an amicus brief with the Supreme
Court in support of the state of Hawaii's
case against the Trump administration's latest ban prohibiting travel from several majority - Muslim nations.
He added that: «On the 8th of May, 2018, the Inspector
General of Police sent a letter to the President of the Senate, Federal Republic of Nigeria signed by the Commissioner of Police, Legal and Prosecution Department, explaining why he would not be appearing before the Senate on the 9th of May, 2018 due to legal restraint as a result of pending
cases before the
courts filed: (i) by Senator Dino Melaye against the IGP and the Nigeria Police Force
in the High
Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja
in suit No.
Mr Amidu, who filed the
case ahead of the 2016
general elections, told the court on Wednesday, 8 February that since there has been a change in government, he would leave the matter to new Attorney General and Minister of Justice Gloria Akuffo to retrieve the money, Accra100.5 FM's Court Correspondent Ama Brako Ampofo re
general elections, told the
court on Wednesday, 8 February that since there has been a change in government, he would leave the matter to new Attorney General and Minister of Justice Gloria Akuffo to retrieve the money, Accra100.5 FM's Court Correspondent Ama Brako Ampofo repo
court on Wednesday, 8 February that since there has been a change
in government, he would leave the matter to new Attorney
General and Minister of Justice Gloria Akuffo to retrieve the money, Accra100.5 FM's Court Correspondent Ama Brako Ampofo re
General and Minister of Justice Gloria Akuffo to retrieve the money, Accra100.5 FM's
Court Correspondent Ama Brako Ampofo repo
Court Correspondent Ama Brako Ampofo reported.
He returned to Texas and
in 2003 was appointed solicitor
general, arguing many
cases before the Supreme
Court in Washington.
New York Attorney
General Eric Schneiderman recently filed a friend - of - the -
court brief
in a
case involving a woman forced to pay estate tax on an inheritance from her female spouse.
In the case of the Sutherland Springs church mass shooting in Texas last November, the U.S. Air Force acknowledged it should have provided information to the FBI that the shooter was previously convicted by a general court - martial for domestic assaul
In the
case of the Sutherland Springs church mass shooting
in Texas last November, the U.S. Air Force acknowledged it should have provided information to the FBI that the shooter was previously convicted by a general court - martial for domestic assaul
in Texas last November, the U.S. Air Force acknowledged it should have provided information to the FBI that the shooter was previously convicted by a
general court - martial for domestic assault.
In accordance with convention, she was appointed as Queen's Counsel, although she had previously had no rights of audience in the higher courts, did not obtain them and never presented a case during her time as Solicitor General, or at al
In accordance with convention, she was appointed as Queen's Counsel, although she had previously had no rights of audience
in the higher courts, did not obtain them and never presented a case during her time as Solicitor General, or at al
in the higher
courts, did not obtain them and never presented a
case during her time as Solicitor
General, or at all.
She has argued 20
cases before the U.S. Supreme
Court, including a 2009 victory for then - state Attorney
General Cuomo to hold national banks responsible for potential racial discrimination
in fair - lending laws and a 2001 win upholding congressional campaign expenditure limits.
«The defendant who was the target
in this
case, George Maziarz, plead to a penal law charge where the penalty was $ 1,000,» Assistant Attorney
General Christopher Baynes said
in court.
A state Supreme
Court justice has thrown out a petition by Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel E. Abelove that sought to undo the state attorney
general's power to take over
cases in which unarmed civilians are killed by police.
The records obtained by Newsday through the state attorney
general's office, which represents the state
in court settlements, show two
cases in the State Legislature.
Schneiderman and 17 other state attorneys
general on Aug. 2 won the right to intervene
in the
case in a ruling by the D.C. Circuit of the U.S.
Court of Appeals.
«So there is no
case; there is no processes to harp on either Oyegun or the chairman of the party
in the state; therefore, there is no order of
court that has stopped this Congress,» said the governor, himself, a lawyer and former Attorney -
General and Commissioner for Justice
in the state, many years ago.
We find it very bizarre that the Hon. Attorney -
General, Ms Gloria Akufo, who assured the entire citizenry of her commitment to fairness and strict adherence to ethical principles at her vetting not too long ago, will claim that she exercised the said constitutional discretion on grounds merely that there was a lack of evidence to prosecute the
case in question when indeed, the Siting Judge,
Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from
Court Clerks,
Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from
Court Bailiffs,
Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from
Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures
in whose presence the said
court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from
court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from same.
Remember that
in the
case of the requirement of «prior approval» by Parliament, the Supreme
Court said
in Mensah versus Attorney -
General that Parliament had to respect the language and act accordingly and not just retain Ministers of the previous government because that was not what «prior approval» meant.
He carried this bad habit of usurping the Attorney -
General's functions into his Presidency which I resisted as the Attorney -
General with all the constitutional authority at my disposal and proved
in the Supreme
Court decisions
in the Attorney -
General, Waterville & Woyome
case, and the Attorney -
General, Isofoton & Forson
case which the White Paper also tries again to bastardize.
«We look forward to proving our felony corruption charges against Mr. Maziarz
in court next month,» said Amy Spitalnick, a spokeswoman for Attorney
General Eric Schneiderman, whose office is prosecuting the
case.
The Government and the Attorney -
General also find it «honourable» to smuggle into the White Paper on the Commissioner's report the Balkan Energy Ghana
case which was argued by me as the Attorney -
General before the Supreme
Court and conclusively decided
in favour of the Republic and was not the subject of the Commissioner's enquiry.
The Cayugas want to inject themselves
in an Oneida nation
court case that has nothing to do with them «for the purpose of disrupting and delaying a landmark settlement between the state, counties and (Oneida nation),» according to papers filed by the state Attorney
General in federal district
court.
In the
case of New Patriotic Party v. Attorney — General [1993 — 94] 2 GLR 35 (31st December Case), the Supreme Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequen
case of New Patriotic Party v. Attorney —
General [1993 — 94] 2 GLR 35 (31st December
Case), the Supreme Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequen
Case), the Supreme
Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequences.
The Attorney
General has filed a writ at the Supreme
Court seeking to quash a decision by the High
Court in a
case involving mining company Exton Cubic and the state.
In December 2008 Greenpeace received a letter from the Crown Prosecution Service revealing that the Attorney - General was close to referring the case of the Kingsnorth Six to the Court of Appeal in an effort to remove the defence of «lawful excuse» from activist
In December 2008 Greenpeace received a letter from the Crown Prosecution Service revealing that the Attorney -
General was close to referring the
case of the Kingsnorth Six to the
Court of Appeal
in an effort to remove the defence of «lawful excuse» from activist
in an effort to remove the defence of «lawful excuse» from activists.
On the same day community watch volunteer George Zimmerman made his first appearance
in court to face murder charges
in the death of Florida teen Trayvon Martin, New York Attorney
General Eric Schneiderman tells WAMC that the
case is a good example of what can happen when the public takes an interest
in pursuing justice.
That overturns a lower -
court ruling in which Albany Supreme Court Justice Christopher Cahill ordered the current attorney general to get any Spitzer e-mails relevant to the Smith
court ruling
in which Albany Supreme
Court Justice Christopher Cahill ordered the current attorney general to get any Spitzer e-mails relevant to the Smith
Court Justice Christopher Cahill ordered the current attorney
general to get any Spitzer e-mails relevant to the Smith
case.
In February 2017 however, Mr. Amidu withdrew his suit seeking an oral examination, explaining that the change of government under the New Patriotic Party under His Excellency the President, Nana Addo Dankwah Akuffo Addo and his Attorney General, Miss Gloria Akuffo's assurance to retrieve all judgment debts wrongfully paid to individuals Mr. Woyome in response prayed the Supreme Court to stay proceedings on the oral examination since he had filed for a review on the cas
In February 2017 however, Mr. Amidu withdrew his suit seeking an oral examination, explaining that the change of government under the New Patriotic Party under His Excellency the President, Nana Addo Dankwah Akuffo Addo and his Attorney
General, Miss Gloria Akuffo's assurance to retrieve all judgment debts wrongfully paid to individuals Mr. Woyome
in response prayed the Supreme Court to stay proceedings on the oral examination since he had filed for a review on the cas
in response prayed the Supreme
Court to stay proceedings on the oral examination since he had filed for a review on the
case.
Justice Baah therefore charged the Electoral Commission to work on a statutory definition of over-voting ahead of the 2020
general elections, to assist the
Court in expeditious handling of such
cases, and also urged it to train its workers well
in election conduct and management.
I accordingly started and won the Woyome
Case of Amidu v Attorney
General & 5 Others
in the Supreme
Court.
This is perfectly understandable to me within the
general context of the investigation
in which the allegation had arisen, and considering that I have lately come to also realize that two of my colleagues
in chambers had been involved as defence counsel
in two
cases before the subject judge amongst twelve
cases in all they have ever done at the Industrial
Court since inception.
Cameron congratulates the attorney
general, who fought the
case in the Supreme
Court.
In the famous case of Attorney - General of Lagos State v Attorney - General of the Federation (2005) 2 WRN 1 at 150, the Supreme Court held that «In our democracy all the Governments of this country, as well as organizations and individuals must kowtow to the due process and this they can vindicate by resorting to the courts for redress in the event of any grievance.&raqu
In the famous
case of Attorney -
General of Lagos State v Attorney -
General of the Federation (2005) 2 WRN 1 at 150, the Supreme
Court held that «
In our democracy all the Governments of this country, as well as organizations and individuals must kowtow to the due process and this they can vindicate by resorting to the courts for redress in the event of any grievance.&raqu
In our democracy all the Governments of this country, as well as organizations and individuals must kowtow to the due process and this they can vindicate by resorting to the
courts for redress
in the event of any grievance.&raqu
in the event of any grievance.»
Rensselaer County DA Joel E. Abelove filed a civil complaint
in state Supreme
Court that seeks to overturn an executive order Cuomo signed two years ago giving the state attorney
general the authority to usurp local district attorneys
in cases in which unarmed civilians are killed during confrontations with police.
The Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II, has called for urgent reforms
in the Attorney
General's Department
in order to reduce bureaucracy and unnecessary delays
in responding to
cases sent to the office for advice and onward prosecution
in the
courts.
In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its dutie
In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme
Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its du
Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its dutie
in the
case of Attorney
General of Ondo State vs Attorney
General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority
in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its dutie
in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the
court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its du
court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duties.
The Attorney
General on Thursday November 26, failed to appear
in court for the beginning of the appeal case against the High Court judgment that freed businessman, Alfred Woyome of any wrongdoing in the Ghc 51 million judgment debt sca
court for the beginning of the appeal
case against the High
Court judgment that freed businessman, Alfred Woyome of any wrongdoing in the Ghc 51 million judgment debt sca
Court judgment that freed businessman, Alfred Woyome of any wrongdoing
in the Ghc 51 million judgment debt scandal.
Former Attorney
General and Minister for Justice, Martin Amidu, has said there is nothing wrong with calls for the President to exercise his prerogative power of mercy,
in the
case of the Montie FM trio, jailed four - months by the Supreme
Court for contempt.