Sentences with phrase «general court refused»

The government of Monaco has been left rueing its own success, after the European Union's General Court refused its application to trade mark «MONACO...

Not exact matches

Remember that guy Jeffries — prosecuted / convicted in Utah for marrying that 14 year old child, but the Mormon UT Supreme Court overturned his conviction and the Mormon attorney General refused to try (s?)

Now there are various ways that you can get those convictions expunged, but it's much more difficult if it has already become a public record, and if your child has been convicted of a DUI in juvenile court, even though that is not accessible to the general public, the DMV will be able to see that conviction and may refuse to give your child the license for some period of time, based on that conviction.

The Smarttys Management and Productions Limited and its lawyers, decided against going to court, and agreed with the Attorney General to pay back some of the money, thereby refusing to be belligerent.

The suspended General Secretary disagreed with the findings of the Disciplinary Committee but refused to proceed to court to have the latter overturn the decision.

It is clear from the foregoing that this Government and the Attorney - General were clearly acting mischievously to politicize the excellent work of the Sole Judgment Debt Commissioner by connecting the NPP's Attorney - General who merely paid upon the consent judgment the Supreme Court had refused to quash by certiorari during the NDC 2 Government as a means of aborting the further investigations ordered by the Commissioner.

Former Attorney General, Martin Amidu in his recent epistle said it is clear that the NDC government is «acting mischievously to politicize the excellent work of the Sole Judgment Debt Commissioner by connecting the NPP's Attorney - General who merely paid upon the consent judgment the Supreme Court had refused to quash by certiorari during the NDC 2 Government as a means of aborting the further investigations ordered by the Commissioner.»

I am referring to the decision of the Hon. Attorney - General to curtail the trial of the infamous Delta Force members who stormed a session of the Kumasi Circuit Court and aided the escape of 13 of their colleagues who were standing trial, by entering a Nolle Prosequi — «Refuse to Pursue.»

The senior advocate said the Socio Economic Rights and Accountability Project had approached a Federal High Court to compel the Office of the Accountant - General of the Federation to account for the recovered funds but that despite getting the court order, the OAGF refused to provide the informaCourt to compel the Office of the Accountant - General of the Federation to account for the recovered funds but that despite getting the court order, the OAGF refused to provide the informacourt order, the OAGF refused to provide the information.

The decision, by a state Supreme Court judge, came after New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo filed a motion Monday saying that Thain, who was ousted shortly after the merger, had refused to provide more information about the compensation.

«Where, therefore, the holy man of God refuses to review his decision to resign, CASER shall seek an order of court to compel him to remain as the general overseer.»

Ikanya, who called on the police to investigate the matter, said, «The Attorney - General of Rivers State, Chinwenwo Aguma, SAN, had boasted that since the police had refused to produce Dr. Lloyd, they (the prosecution) would ensure that Lloyd appeared in court to take a plea «their own way» and six hours later, the country home of Lloyd was bombed and razed.

Nigeria Police and Inspector General of Police, who are 1st and 2nd respondents in the suit, however, refused to make appearance in court.

We planned to submerge 130,000 acres of farmland, and Missouri's attorney general asked the Supreme Court to stop the operation, but the court refused the reqCourt to stop the operation, but the court refused the reqcourt refused the request.

In a case decided yesterday by the General Court this tension between secrecy needed for the effective conduct of negotiations and the right of citizens to be informed was readily apparent in determining whether the Commission was acting lawfully in its decision to refuse access to documents related to those negotiations to European Member of Parliament Sophie in «t Veld.

Courts are usually not formalistic in their approach to article V (1)(d) and as a result have applied it in a restrictive manner.857 This is consistent with the general discretion of courts to refuse challenges under article V (1) of the Convention, which provides that a court «may» refuse recognition and enforcemeCourts are usually not formalistic in their approach to article V (1)(d) and as a result have applied it in a restrictive manner.857 This is consistent with the general discretion of courts to refuse challenges under article V (1) of the Convention, which provides that a court «may» refuse recognition and enforcemecourts to refuse challenges under article V (1) of the Convention, which provides that a court «may» refuse recognition and enforcement.858

The General Court annulled the Commission decision to refuse to register the Minority Safepak ECI on the basis of the first of the organiser's claims: «[The Commission] decision manifestly does not contain sufficient elements to enable the applicant to ascertain the reasons for the refusal to register the proposed ECI».

Recall that the reason these cases came to the Supreme Court was that the Attorney General of Ontario took the position that the amici played a role similar to that of defence counsel and should accept legal aid rates, but the amici refused to accept those rates, and the judges fixed rates that exceeded the legal aid tariff and ordered the Attorney General to pay those higher rates.

In the General Court's opinion, the Commission and the Council had made their decision to refuse MET status without sufficient investigation into whether the fact that the State was a substantial shareholder in Xinanchem and had influenced the appointment and composition of the board of directors necessarily amounted to State control over decisions regarding production and pricing (para. 19).

However, the General Court upheld the EMA's decision refusing Teva's generic application for imatinib in view of nilotinib's orphan drug exclusivity pertaining to CML.

The Court relied upon Canada (Attorney General) v Whaling, 2014 SCC 20 (CanLII), [2014] 1 S.C.R. 392 and Liang v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 BCCA 190 (CanLII), 311 C.C.C. (3d) 159, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, [2014] S.C.C.A. No. 298.

Unfortunately, in addition to refusing rectification, the Court, fearful of «pump [ing] theoretical steroids into the rectification doctrine and [giving] it the strength or force that the Supreme Court of Canada recently and consistently has declined to do» 10 also declined to recognize the general equitable jurisdiction of the superior courts to do justice between parties suffering from the unintended consequences of their mistakes.

While the General Court concludes that the Council was too quick in refusing access to parts of the requested documents, it did not go along with Besselink's claim to the exceptional, constitutionally significant nature of the requested documents.

Many judges flatly refused to consider the decision as precedent for anything, relying on the Supreme Court's admonition and a more general unease.

I have already mentioned the lawsuit by Aniz Alani, who is trying to have the courts declare that the Prime Minister must advise the Governor General to appoint Senators, which the Prime Minster is refusing to do.

The Casebook also includes court decisions from Canada: Haig v. Canada (1992)(omission of sexual orientation in the Canadian Human Rights Act is discriminatory); Egan v. Canada (1995)(whether exclusion of same - sex relationships from the definition of common law spouse violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 15 prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation); Vriend v. Alberta (1998)(college laboratory instructor dismissed because of his homosexuality); Hall v. Powers (2002)(student refused permission to attend a prom at a Catholic high school with his boyfriend); Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (2003)(whether denial of marriage licenses to same - sex couples based on the common law definition of marriage was discriminatory under the Charter; a postscript indicates that the 2005 Civil Marriage Act provided for gender - neutral definition of marriage).

In general, the court refuses to suspend visitation unless the noncustodial parent is abusive or there are other problems that put the child at risk.