A Review of
General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Dr John Watson as the 17th most cited psychologist of the 20th century.
Not exact matches
For example, according to a
survey published in the 2002 issue of the Review of
General Psychology, he was ranked at # 17 of the most cited psychologists of the century.
Patients attending a clinic run by the King's College London Dental Institute Health
Psychology Service at Guy's and St Thomas» NHS Foundation Trust were
surveyed for their levels of dental anxiety,
general anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, alcohol use and oral health - related quality of life.
«Physicists are in
general quite different from the population,» says Chris Jackson, senior lecturer in personality and occupational
psychology at London Guildhall University, who did the
survey with the institute and Corporate Assessment, a personality testing company.
Phil, finding two errors in José's examples doesn't exactly an «epic fail», since the main point «The Cook et al 97 % paper included a bunch of
psychology studies, marketing papers, and
surveys of the
general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change» remains valid.
The main point «The Cook et al 97 % paper included a bunch of
psychology studies, marketing papers, and
surveys of the
general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change» remains valid.
The thrust of the argument is that the inclusion of «a bunch of
psychology studies, marketing papers, and
surveys of the
general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change.»
First: «The Cook et al. (2013) 97 % paper included a bunch of
psychology studies, marketing papers, and
surveys of the
general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change.»
Did Cook et al. (2013) include
psychology studies, marketing papers, and
surveys of the
general public, as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change?