Sentences with phrase «geophysical laboratory research»

Geophysical Laboratory research scientist, Muhtar Ahart, has been awarded an Alan Berman Research Publication Award from the Department of the Navy for 2016.

Torredu, India — Geophysical Laboratory research scientist Maddury Somayazulu visited Torredu, India this month and gave a talk to the children of the village in telugu (a South - Central Dravidian language) about how science impacts society.

Not exact matches

Donald Argus of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, and colleagues used 15 years of GPS data to show that parts of the Ellsworth mountains in west Antarctica are rising by around 5 millimetres a year (Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: 10.1029 / 2011gl048025).

«In summer when people are thinking about 4th of July fireworks and barbeques, long before the first snow has fallen, our experimental prediction system tells us what the following March will be like,» said Sarah Kapnick, a physical scientist at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory who led the research that appears online today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In a March report in Geophysical Research Letters scientists at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) describe how large waves can penetrate more deeply into ice cover and break it up faster and more completely than anyone had suspected.

Initial research of the acoustic data and development of the migration model was conducted at Princeton with K. Allison Smith (published as K.A.S. Mislan), a postdoctoral research associate in the Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, and Charles Stock, a researcher with the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

And visible, overhanging clouds seem to be filling them, a team led by Elizabeth Turtle of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, reports this week in Geophysical Research Letters.

«This new high - resolution climate model is able to simulate regional - scale precipitation with considerably improved accuracy compared to previous generation models,» said Tom Delworth, a research scientist at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in Princeton, N.J., who helped develop the new model and is co-author of the paper.

The research entitled «Network analysis of geomagnetic substorms using the SuperMAG database of ground - based magnetometer stations» has just been published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics by a team of researchers from the Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics in the Department of Physics at the University of Warwick; The Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; and The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Marylaresearch entitled «Network analysis of geomagnetic substorms using the SuperMAG database of ground - based magnetometer stations» has just been published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics by a team of researchers from the Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics in the Department of Physics at the University of Warwick; The Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; and The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MarylaResearch: Space Physics by a team of researchers from the Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics in the Department of Physics at the University of Warwick; The Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; and The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA.

The GPS signal used for «sat - navs» could help improve understanding of ocean currents, according to new research published in Geophysical Research Letters by National Oceanography Centre (NOC) scientists, alongside colleagues from the University of Michigan and Jet Propulsion Labresearch published in Geophysical Research Letters by National Oceanography Centre (NOC) scientists, alongside colleagues from the University of Michigan and Jet Propulsion LabResearch Letters by National Oceanography Centre (NOC) scientists, alongside colleagues from the University of Michigan and Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

His seminal paper, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research in 1952, is also famous for its tongue - in - cheek lecture on the uncertainties inherent in extrapolating laboratory and proxy observations to the high pressure and high temperature interiors of planets.

Snow «pushes» earth down Donald Argus, a research scientist and geophysicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., recently published a study outlining the new technique in the journal Geophysical Research research scientist and geophysicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., recently published a study outlining the new technique in the journal Geophysical Research Research Letters.

«At any given instant, the noise coming from the lab fault zone provides quantitative information on when the fault will slip,» said Paul Johnson, a Los Alamos National Laboratory fellow and lead investigator on the research, which was published today in Geophysical Research research, which was published today in Geophysical Research Research Letters.

The paper is authored by Ryuho Kataoka (National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, Japan and Graduate University for Advanced Studies [Sokendai], Hayama, Japan), Yoshizumi Miyoshi (Solar - Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Japan [STEL]-RRB-, Kai Shigematsu (STEL), Donald Hampton (Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, USA), Yoshiki Mori (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shizuoka University, Japan), Takayuki Kubo (Department of Precision Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan [DPE]-RRB-, Atsushi Yamashita (DPE), Masayuki Tanaka (Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan), Toshiyuki Takahei (Orihalcon Technologies, Inc., Japan), Taro Nakai (Hydrospheric Atmospheric Research Center, Nagoya University, Japan), Hiroko Miyahara (Musashino Art University, Tokyo, Japan) and Kazuo Shiokawa (STEL).

Led by Geophysical Laboratory's Ho - kwang «Dave» Mao, the research team believes that as much as 300 million tons of water could be carried down into Earth's interior every year and generate deep, massive reservoirs of iron dioxide, which could be the source of the ultralow velocity zones that slow down seismic waves at the core - mantle boundary.

But in the most comprehensive study to date of overcast versus cloud - free days in China, a team led by the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, reporting in the current advance online issue of Geophysical Research Letters, has found that cloud cover has been decreasing for the past 50 years.

This work was supported with grants from the NASA Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology Program, the NASA Astrobiology Institute, the W.M. Keck Foundation, the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, Carnegie Institution of Canada, the Naval Research Laboratory, the NRC Research Associateship Program, Boston College, and the FQRNT Some data was acquired at beamline 5.3.2.2 at the ALS, which is supported by the Director of the Office of Science Department of Energy.

The most highly cited Geophysical Laboratory papers of the past forty years demonstrate the breadth and evolution of science in the department, ranging from seminal discoveries to breakthroughs in technique, spanning small research teams to large - scale collaborations.

Methods: As reported in Geophysical Research Letters, the team led by scientists from PNNL and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory used both observations and models to derive their new formula.

The Carnegie center, Energy Frontier Research in Extreme Environments (EFree II), will be headquartered at Carnegie's Geophysical Laboratory and directed by Russell J. Hemley.

Sendai, Japan — The Geophysical Laboratory's webmaster and departmental assistant, Michelle Scholtes, was invited to the Advanced Institute for Materials Research at Tohoko University in Sendai, Japan for a foreign exchange of information regarding administrative support in a scientific research instResearch at Tohoko University in Sendai, Japan for a foreign exchange of information regarding administrative support in a scientific research instresearch institution.

After graduating from UW - Madison with a BS in atmospheric science, DJ was a research fellow at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL).

Research Team: J. Jason West, Raquel A. Silva, Yuqiang Zhang, Zachariah Adelman and Meridith M. Fry, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill; Steven J. Smith, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Vaishali Naik, UCAR / NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Susan Anenberg, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Larry W. Horowitz, NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; and Jean - Francois Lamarque, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).

-- The Carnegie Institution's Geophysical Laboratory has been selected as one of 46 Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs) by the U.S. Department of Energy.

The Geophysical Laboratory and DTM have a joint library that supports advanced research in the physical, earth, and space sciences.

Acknowledgments: The research was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Systems Research program and performed by Drs. Steven J. Ghan, Xiaohong Liu, and Mikhail Ovchinnikov of PNNL; Dr. Hayder Abdul - Razzak of Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Dr. Athanasios Nenes of Georgia Institute of Technology; Dr. Yi Ming of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Dr. Ben Shipway of United Kingdom Meteorology Office; Dr. Nicholas Meskhidze of North Carolina State University; Dr. Jun Xu of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences; and Xiangjun Shi of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sresearch was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Systems Research program and performed by Drs. Steven J. Ghan, Xiaohong Liu, and Mikhail Ovchinnikov of PNNL; Dr. Hayder Abdul - Razzak of Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Dr. Athanasios Nenes of Georgia Institute of Technology; Dr. Yi Ming of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Dr. Ben Shipway of United Kingdom Meteorology Office; Dr. Nicholas Meskhidze of North Carolina State University; Dr. Jun Xu of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences; and Xiangjun Shi of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of SResearch program and performed by Drs. Steven J. Ghan, Xiaohong Liu, and Mikhail Ovchinnikov of PNNL; Dr. Hayder Abdul - Razzak of Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Dr. Athanasios Nenes of Georgia Institute of Technology; Dr. Yi Ming of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Dr. Ben Shipway of United Kingdom Meteorology Office; Dr. Nicholas Meskhidze of North Carolina State University; Dr. Jun Xu of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences; and Xiangjun Shi of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of SResearch Academy of Environmental Sciences; and Xiangjun Shi of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author info 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 2 Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway 3 National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA 4 Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA 5 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht (IMAU), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands

The findings are being reported in the peer - reviewed journal Geophysical Research Letters (the paper is available by subscription only) and were produced by a novel partnership including researchers at two federal laboratories, the Weather Channel and Climate Central, a nonprofit group focused on communicating climate science.

It's written by five leading climate scientists, all of whom have long been reliable guides to a complicated and consequential body of science — John M. Wallace at the University of Washington, Isaac M. Held at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, David W. J. Thompson at Colorado State University, Kevin E. Trenberth at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and John E. Walsh at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

These were the participants of the Climate Model Evaluation Project workshop (CMEP) and came here from most (if not all) the major, most prestigious climate research laboratories of the world, including; The US labs National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, the British Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction, the German Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, the French Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques and the IPSL / LMD / LSCE, the Australian CSIRO Atmospheric Research, the Chinese Institute of Atmospheric Physics, the Russian Institute for Numerical Mathematics and the Japanese Meteorological Research Inresearch laboratories of the world, including; The US labs National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, the British Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction, the German Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, the French Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques and the IPSL / LMD / LSCE, the Australian CSIRO Atmospheric Research, the Chinese Institute of Atmospheric Physics, the Russian Institute for Numerical Mathematics and the Japanese Meteorological Research InResearch, the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, the British Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction, the German Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, the French Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques and the IPSL / LMD / LSCE, the Australian CSIRO Atmospheric Research, the Chinese Institute of Atmospheric Physics, the Russian Institute for Numerical Mathematics and the Japanese Meteorological Research InResearch, the Chinese Institute of Atmospheric Physics, the Russian Institute for Numerical Mathematics and the Japanese Meteorological Research InResearch Institute.

A new study, led by Son Nghiem at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and appearing this week in Geophysical Research Letters, used satellites and buoys to show that winds since 2000 had pushed huge amounts of thick old ice out of the Arctic basin past Greenland.

The report's authors include Salvatore Pascale, an associate research scholar in atmospheric and oceanic sciences (AOS); Tom Delworth, a lecturer in geosciences and AOS and research scientist at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL); Sarah Kapnick, a 2004 Princeton alumna and former AOS postdoc who is currently a research physical scientist at GFDL; AOS associate research scholar Hiroyuki Murakami; and Gabriel Vecchi, a professor of geosciences and the Princeton Environmental Institute.

Acronyms for centers mentioned in the text include GFDL: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (Manabe); NCAR: National Center for Atmospheric Research; CCM: NCAR's Community Climate Model; ECMWF: European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts; GISS: Goddard Institute for Space Sciences (Hansen); UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles (Mintz, Arakawa).

To project changes in hurricane behavior over time, the authors used the IPCC's 18 - model ensemble plus other projections from four of the ensemble's leading models (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Japanese Meteorological Research Institute, Max Planck Institute, and Hadley Centre UK Meteorological Office).

Last Thursday, for instance, the Journal of Geophysical Research — Atmospheres published a study led by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory climate scientist Ben Santer.

D. L. Elliott, L. L. Wendell, and G. L. Gower, An Assessment of the Available Windy Land Area and Wind Energy Potential in the Contiguous United States (Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratory, 1991); C. L. Archer and M. Z. Jacobson, «The Spatial and Temporal Distributions of U.S. Winds and Wind Power at 80 m Derived from Measurements,» Journal of Geophysical Research, 16 May 2003.

Research Highlights Summary from Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Global Temperature Projections 100 ° days: Past and Future

The storms intensify more rapidly today due largely to a natural climate phenomenon From the DOE / PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY Hurricanes that intensify rapidly — a characteristic of almost all powerful hurricanes — do so more strongly and quickly now than they did 30 years ago, according to a study published recently in Geophysical Research Letters, a...

The incipient MISOMIP team collectively contributed to the content of this article: Ben Galton - Fenzi, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; Byron Parizek, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dimitri Menemenlis, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.; Eric Larour, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.; Frank Pattyn, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels Belgium; Gaël Durand, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l'Environnement, Saint - Martin d'Hères, France; Hyun - cheol Kim, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon, South Korea; Ian Joughin, University of Washington, Seattle; Jeff Ridley, Met Office, Exeter, U.K.; Kazuya Kusahara, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan; Mats Bentsen, Bjerknes Center, Bergen, Norway; Michael Dinniman, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va.; Nicolas Jourdain, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l'Environnement, Saint - Martin d'Hères, France; Pierre Mathiot, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, U.K.; Ralph Timmermann, Alfred Wegner Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany; Robert Hallberg, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, N.J.; Rupert Gladstone, Arctic Center, Rovaniemi, Finland; Ryan Walker, University of Maryland, College Park; Sebastian Mernild, Centro de Estudios Cientificos, Valdivia, Chile; Sebastian Goeller, Alfred Wegner Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany; Sophie Nowicki, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.; Steve Price, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.; Tore Hattermann, Akvaplan, Tromsø, Norway; Won Sang Lee, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon, South Korea; Xylar Asay - Davis, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.

«For decision makers to accurately weigh the pros and cons of geo - engineering against those of human - caused climate change, they need more information,» said Ben Kravitz, of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and one of a consortium which has published a succession of five studies in the Journal of Geophysical Research — Atmospheres.

The El Niño / Southern Oscillation Diagnostic Discussion is a team effort consisting of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, Climate Diagnostics Center, National Climatic Data Center, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, and the International Research Institute for Climate Prediction.

«S. J. Holgate, a recognised world authority in geophysical research at the UK - based Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory in Liverpool, in his paper published in 2007» as the cite for the claim that «Importantly, there was no increase in the rate of change over the whole century.»

More recent computations from the National Center for Atmospheric Research and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory models bear this out with updated CTM simulations.

Models include the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) model, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Seasonal to Interannual Prediction Program (NSIPP) model, the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3), the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) model, the Centre for Climate System Research (CCSR) model, the Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre (BMRC) model and the Hadley Centre Atmospheric Model version 3 (HadAM3).

The montage was originally published in March 2017 by the Journal of Geophysical Research as part of a study authored by Jeffrey Moore of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

In a paper, «Heat Capacity, Time Constant, and Sensitivity of Earth's Climate System» soon to be published in the Journal of Geophysical Research (and discussed briefly at RealClimate a few weeks back), Stephen Schwartz of Brookhaven National Laboratory estimates climate sensitivity using observed 20th - century data on ocean heat content and global surface temperature.

We thank the following speakers who shared their knowledge with the committee: James Anderson, Harvard University; Theodore L. Anderson, University of Washington; Gordon Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research; Thomas Crowley, Duke University; Kea Duckenfield, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); Jerry Elwood, Department of Energy; David Fahey, NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory; Jay Fein, National Science Foundation; Peter Gent, National Center for Atmospheric Research; James Hansen, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Institute for Space Studies; Dennis Hartmann, University of Washington; Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland; Yoram Kaufman, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; James Mahoney, U.S. Climate Change Science Program; Kenneth Mooney, NOAA; Richard Moss, U.S. Climate Change Science Program; V. Ramaswamy, NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Daniel Rosenfeld, Hebrew University; Susan Solomon, NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory; Graeme Stephens, Colorado State University; Lucia Tsaoussi, NASA; and Josh Willis, Scripps Institution of Oceanography.