Sentences with phrase «getting qb»

Getting QB early will help you in the long run.

Spending dollars on Keenum and still getting a QB in round one seems like mismanagement from the front office to me.

Yeah I thought of sending back a late niners pick but getting a qb and keeping 12 is pretty tempting by it self.

front office bet on Gruden by getting him the qb he wanted..

I'd also settle for drafting two other prospects in the first round too, and getting a QB in the 2nd or 3rd round.

Cleveland wants up for a tackle after getting their QB and barkley or Chubb in the top 4.

Our biggest needs as a team after QB are getting QB pressure and pass defense.

Getting a QB and CB in the fourth is excellent.

If the team purposefully closes the option of getting a QB that falls, there will be a price to pay later.

Just get QB figured out.

Jets: If Broncos don't get a QB they'll draft a QB unless they win the Kirk Cousins sweekpstakes.

I look at the fact they basically traded a 1st (depending on how you value fuller) and a 3rd round pick (HUGE HAUL) to go get a qb in an off season that had more qbs than any i have EVER seen before.

Giving up high round draft picks to get a QB at the detriment to other positions would be just as big of a risk if not a much longer term risk.

It was either take the hold or get your QB hurt.

But spending a high pick to get a QB who will sit on the bench for 2 or 3 years is old school, not current NFL.

Flip a 2nd rounder for Alex and we end up better off in draft capital because of the compensation and get a QB upgrade at 17M / yr

A minority of people were calling for Damian Williams to get the QB job early in the year with Nick struggling, but most everyone could see that Nick Fitzgerald gave this team the best chance to win and compete both now and in the future.

If they deal their # 22 in the 1st and their 4th, they still have the ammo to jump up and get the QB of their choice.

Failure is giving up multiple high draft picks to trade up and get a QB who doesn't pan out.

«We should be really good,» Sanchez says, «if we can get our QB in order.»

They've got the QB and another piece or two, but they have a lot of holes to fill.

Then they could get another QB or RB in the third round.

and until we get a QB who can see open receivers and deliver the ball accurately we will always be in danger of losing.

My thoughts: I really think Buffalo will make a move up the board to get their QB this year.

And for those of you who will say we can get a QB next year or that we could be picking this high again very soon — we haven't had a pick this high since we took Rivers / swapped for Eli 14 years ago.

But if the Eli support is a smokescreen then we must draft one of these QB's at 2 or trade down to 4 where we can still get our QB if it is Mayfield.

His «everyone go deep» play calling will get any QB killed.

It's the GM's job to get the QB of the future.

When Whaley leaves he says good luck to the future GM and you're welcome for the ammo to go get the QB.

Keenum is starting regardless, so honestly it would be a good thing to get a QB and not feel the need to rush him out on the field this year.

Why would we trade a decent QB for a mid round pick to get another QB?

Cleveland still has the Fourth pick and can get their QB there.

Texas A&M got QB Trevor Knight back early for the LSU game while the Tigers were without Leonard Fournette, yet LSU moved from -4.5 to -7 by close.

Why force the QB this year to sit for a year or two when there are questions about if Webb can be the guy and are other opportunities to get a QB in the future when we need one?

I prefer the BPA method, but also recognize that nothing gets fixed until we get the QB position settled long term.

Not only am I excited to see if we move up, I'm excited to see if we stay and get the qb «we wanted» or go to a different position in general.

Now lets get a QB that can get him the ball without getting him injured.

So they drop one spot to get the QB they want because he is more of a project than others and other assests.

This also implies that we wouldn't have to trade up in a subsequent draft and «mortgage» our future to get a QB.

I didn't like that he said he wanted to get a QB that fit his system.

Gives the Patriots plenty of ammo should they decide (as it is beginning to appear) that they want to possibly trade up and get a QB for the future.

All the QB needy teams got their QB's.

The problem lies in what we have to give up to get that QB and how many teams we are competing for to get said QB.

The Jets will get their QB.

Got a QB from division 1AA who got hurt last season and only played 7 games who everybody says needs to sit a year....

My stance is clear — I don't care about trading up, just get our QB and stock things up.

What would suck for this franchise and our gm / coach would be to stay put, not get a qb, finish 2018 the season 8 - 8 and be in the same position next year's draft.

The Browns will get their QB.

No need to move goalposts or satisfy me, just get us a QB and stick to him.

It's possible to get a QB without «selling the future» to get a top of the 1st round QB, but you guys didn't address those possibilities because you're invested in the Chargers getting Jackson at 17.