Sentences with phrase «getting a good score means»

Getting a good score means PaRappa is actually rapping off beat, like that drunk guy at the bar who doesn't follow the karaoke monitor fast enough.

Not exact matches

That means being realistic about how long you plan to stay in your home, getting your credit score in order, finding the best refinance rates and saving money where you can, such as on inspection fees and closing costs.

A higher credit score can also mean you get better interest rates.

Borrowers with fair to average credit — which means they have credit scores between 630 and 680 — will face more difficulty in getting personal loans than borrowers with good credit.

It's also normal for these lenders to provide risk - based loans, meaning a better credit score will get lower rates.

I guess that just means you think you're special enough to your god that prayer would get you to have good test scores, but god will continue to let children around the world starve, get kidnapped, raped, and all sorts of horrific things, but it's a priority that you get good grades.

Besiktas is a real threat to us specially this early in the season with many players not quite fit, it is important that we don't let Besiktas score even if it means 0 - 0 score line in Turkey, i am sure once we get them in Emirates we will do well.

Arsene Wenger can must get Ben Yedder as long as he's clinical and can beat his man.I'd take him over Giroud any day and I think if Giroud is put in that Toulouse squad he won't score more goals than Ben Yedder and denying this fact would mean you choose to be blinded.We had better get him quickly.I've said it here time and time again the reason why Arsenal are not winning things with Giroud is because he's not clinical.If you guys were to ever watch his misses in every season by season since he came here you would be shocked at the kind of striker we have.But as usual he's always forgiven and people continually rate him basing it on statistics and forget he's playing for Arsenal with the likes of.......

I for one would go and get him straight away as Ben Yedder is an all round striker a bag of tricks he plays in a lower team and scored a bag full of goals which means he fought hard against better defenders to get his goals Ben Yedder can come at you from any direction with either foot and score and he is good at set pieces two I would be ecstatically delighted if we sign him up as we would have our own Mahrez

Yedder is known as a goalscoring talent in France and has scored 70 goals in four seasons, a mean feat for any striker, let alone a player who doesn't get the best of service from his teammates.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I mean defenders getting forward during open play and not set pieces, who would have ever imagined the likes of Nigel Winterburn and Stuart Pearce «breezing» past players on the wings, overlapping midfielders and producing pint point and precise crossing to the strikers up front or even better yet taking on defenders and scoring... Doesn't sound right to the ear, does it?

That means anyone who's tied for 50th or better, or anyone within 10 strokes of the low score after Friday's round, gets to stick around for Saturday and Sunday.

Well yeah gird missed his headers today, but you got ta say that can be excused after he scored almost every good chance for a header in the last 5 games i mean if the form doesn't excuse one players bad game, why aren't the ones who are blaming gird, blaming alexis?

He is not a quality striker because he makes a lot of mistakes in his game.The fact that he scores 20 goals does not mean he is a quality back up striker.It is one thing to be a goal scorer and another thing to be a good or average player.Goal scoring is a very important aspect of a player but not the only aspect.Trust me you can score 20 goals in all competitions and still be average.If Chamakh, Gervinho and all the so called flops scored this same goals they would still have been considered not good enough for Arsenal.His game is just not good enough and I for one believe even if no one believes that we can get a backup striker who is better than him and also a top centre forward.Its all about mentality and willingness.Forget his goals and look at his game or else you'll force me to bring up strikers in the world who have scored his same goals and are even considered terrible.

in the epl, for 3 seasons giroud is a 13 goal per season striker, 20 is all competitions at best, that means 1 goal every 3 matches, that will not win any leaque, henry scored 27 when we last won, unless we get production from somewhere else, no way to win it...

«From what I've heard, he's meant to be very good, always hungry for goals and ice - cold when he gets into a scoring position.

«From what I've heard, he's meant to be very good, always hungry for goals and ice - cold when he gets into a scoring position.

I mean the game hasn't changed * that * much in the last 10 years — the teams who can score against the most stubborn defences and defend well themselves tend to do rather well Giroud gets through an awful lot of ugly work in a match, even when he doesn't score and is also an asset when defending set pieces.

I read somewhere that some said we're not clinical enough that is a culture at wenger has become too friendly with the players at Arsenal the players position are seldom under treat you play poorly for two weeks and you still make the team you missed a look at almunia retrospectively don't understand that hey if i get a chance to score i must take it the first time cause i may not get a next one and you want the players to be clinical it must start from the top good work or none As was said on a website to day Arsenal should parade through the streets of london in an open top Bus at the end of the season the accountants of the club and i will through wenger in there too cause to most of you he can do no wrong I love this club with all my heart and i can support no other club in football but to see for 5 seasons we can't show any vast improvement and keep making the same mistakes every year is hard to swallow it makes me sick but as wenger says judge me at the end i wonder what end he meant the end of the season or the end of his contract GO ARSENAL......................

@ Annoyed, I also must admit that I slightly underestimated Boro, evn thou I was the one who used to mention to not do that here, I also agree with you about the suggestion of bringing the young guys up to get experienced for the next season.But franckly my friend, please watch the reply of the game again, The boro defense were so opened for an usual full attack Arsenal way of play.In the 1st half they were evn panicking evrytime we attacked of which we shoud have taken advtges but did nt happen.The more attack you launch on pressure to your opponent, the more chance you have for scoring a goal.And we did have the opportunity from the fact that Boro's defense were desorganised during the 1st half and the 1st 20mn of the 2nd half, counter attack launch opportunity were a lot but we just did nt take them, which means that Its us who did nt take our chance at best but not Boro is the good team.Hull city!!? i totaly agree that they are much stronger and physical team, as well as newcastl or westham or portsmouth or Avilla.But that game yestday was not so tight as the same we played agst those team tht I mentioned above, we could have clearly won that game if we played a bit stronger, did nt even need lots of our skill capacity but just a bit of acceleration, then we could have had more chance to score, watch the reply and u will see yourself.

In this case, failing means student test scores are in the bottom 5 percent, test scores are getting worse instead of better, or the schools» graduation rates are below 60 percent for three consecutive years.

This means the best score you could get for a day's workout would be 12 stars: 4 exercises and 3 stars per exercise, and you then move up to the next level for all four exercises for the next workout.

Well, on a pooch - hiding scale, this caplet scores a 75 % (without the Belly Bandit)... meaning I only get asked when I'm «due» roughly 25 % of the time.

The character leveling also means that you have an incentive to play with each character, and have some solid progress to work toward in the game toward not just getting high scores and unlocking new areas, but also making your characters even better.

This means that in many of California's public high schools, students can graduate, but they won't be able to get into a UC or CSU college even if they have a good GPA and good test scores.

By deep learning we mean a lot of schools are very good at what you call «superficial» learning, which is teaching towards getting good ATAR scores, or doing well on the NAPLAN test.

Judging teacher education programs by means of the scores that their teachers» students get on state tests is a good way to judge the quality of the teacher education program.

If a student gets a score putting them in the 75th percentile, that means the student performed as well or better than 75 percent of students in the same group who took the same test.

Under that measure, Hethersett Academy students were well above the national average for progress chalking up a score of +0.89 - meaning pupils on average got close to a grade higher because they attended the academy.

how does this get 8.5 and the galaxy s2 get 9... are you seriously saying that a dual core 1.2 ghz, epandable memory, bigger battery, samoled plus screen means its only 0.5 point better lol this seriously shows problems in phonearena score system... just to compare the cons of the two phones shows how hard they tried to bring the galaxy s2 score down

While different types of mortgages and various lenders are going to have individual credit score requirements, it's important to understand that merely having a good enough score to get approved for a home loan doesn't mean you're going to be offered a great deal.

Better credit score means a lower interest rate so you either save money each month or commit more money to principal so you can get a nicer ride.

If you have a good credit score, you're more likely to get the lower interest rate, which means you'll have lower finance charges on balances you don't pay off.

You can control them by learning just a few of the secrets and / or a few of the things that go in to making your credit score and just start taking control of that, because a high credit score means you get a lot better deals when you need them.

This means you will find your score getting better if your credit score is fixed over time.

A very good - to - excellent credit score is important in the approval process, so anything below a prime FICO score of 700 may mean getting saddled with inflated interest rates or declined for the loan.

By choosing to freeze your credit, you ensure that even if thieves do get their hands on your private information, they won't be able to use it to open future lines of credit — and that will mean you're in a better position to protect your confidential information and your credit score.

This means any charge offs — and the hefty credit score dips that accompany them — will remain a thorn in the side of your attempts to get credit for the better part of a decade.

Learn all about the ChexSystem score (also known as the Qualifile score) to see what is considered a good score — the one that means you'll get approved for a new bank account.

If you've got a 715 credit score, you're doing pretty well and it's by no means a bad credit score.

But that does not mean you get a higher credit score because you are now being compared to consumers with better credit profiles.

This means that you'll have to get your balance down to roughly 30 % of your limit in order to have the best shot at improving your score.

This means that a better credit score may help you get approved for a car loan, credit card, home equity loan, debt consolidation loan or other personal loan at a lower interest rate.

It is important to know your score can vary by 20 points from one month to the next, which can mean the difference between getting a good loan rate and the best car loan rate available.

If your credit score is 760 or above, you're considered a low - risk borrower — meaning you're likely to get the best interest rates and terms when you apply for a loan.

However, while a minimum credit score of 660 probably means you'll get approved for a loan, you won't get the best rates or terms.

You won't get a mortgage or a credit card without a good score, which, according to Susie Henson, a spokesperson for Experian, one of the three credit bureaus in the U.S. that track your credit score, is meant to answer this question:

But when it comes to your FICO credit score, being average means you probably won't get the best mortgage rates.

You'll have greater chances of getting approved for an Avant personal loan if you have a credit score of at least 580, which means Avant is a better choice for borrowers with lower credit scores.