Sentences with phrase «giroud aerial ability»

subbing in Xhaka, Ramsey against such team and (as much as I hate to admit it) bringing in Giroud aerial ability in 2nd half of such games were penetration is impossible is the solution against such teams.

Giroud aerial ability like last night against Romania is something that we should count on.

Not exact matches

If Walcott was needed because of his speed he should have replaced Ozil but Giroud should have stayed on because we need his aerial ability.

The centre forward has a great touch for a big man and with his strength and aerial ability he makes space and makes things happen for the players around him, like Ramsey, which is why the Welshman is clearly happy to have Giroud in the team as much as possible.

Giroud's presence, aerial ability and link up play, plus the fact he is looking sharp and has already won us our only EPL points off the bench against Leicester, could be vital against a Bournemouth likely to defend deep and restrict space.

I still don't see how he is a super sub.He's labelled as a super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him as a super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are as good in the air.

Giroud is a significant loss given that he is a key option off the bench, offering a different dynamic in attack with his physicality, aerial strength and ability to build attacks and hold up the ball.

What I do think, however, is that Wenger and the Gunners have a great chance to make the most of this blow to our opponents and the way to do it for me would be to start with Olivier Giroud as our centre forward and hope that his aerial ability proves too much for the rest of the Leicester back four to deal with, as Morgan is usually the man to dominate their box in the air.

Arsenal don't do either which is stupid given the aerial abilities of Wellbeck, Sanchez and Giroud.

I know a lot of you will want the summer striker signing Lacazette there but with Alexis Sanchez definitely out I would play him on the left and use Giroud's aerial ability, presence and link up play in a match which we are likely to dominate anyway.

Olivier Giroud, for all his holdup abilities and aerial prowess, has never hit 20 goals for a season in the English top flight.

You play without pacey wingers (ramsey) and want to come narrow but have giroud as a striker whose main attribute is his aerial ability and strength.

Giroud has 10 times the aerial ability of Crouch.

Giroud 7 — Made a big difference with his power, aerial ability and link up play.

Arsenal at that time had a lack of aerial ability in the final third, it was talked about allot and was one of the reasons I liked the Giroud transfer until I got the entire picture.

So I think they will be very defensive and deep and that is when Giroud's strength, aerial ability and link up play are more useful than pace.

Giroud had replaced Walcott and had then missed a great chance with his first touch and the questions about our scoring power were looming large, but Cazorla then provided a great ball and the French striker showed his aerial ability to head a second and seal the win.

There is another possibility which might sound like madness given our manager's tactical history, but what about a 4 -4-2, with Giroud and Vardy operating as the old school strike pairing that combines strength and aerial ability on one side and speed and finishing on the other?

mate u have to wait because there is only one striker who mixes the strength aerial ability and holdup of giroud, movement speed and dedication of Theo also he has technicality of someone like Suarez and we will face him on Tuesday I hope we beat Bayern in both games and again at some point in current UCL (once if we get through our group) then he might consider joining us other than him no one is there WO can offer so much

If we have three strikers, and the other two are better than Giroud, I'd keep Giroud for his aerial ability, offence as well as defence.

It's questionable as to whether selling Giroud is a smart idea given he offers a completely different option up front with his physicality, aerial prowess and ability to help build attacks.

Giroud is not my preferred striker, I think welbeck type would be my preferred choice, good pace, good aerial ability but still lacking in finishing.