Let's keep super
Giroud as Super sub.
I would KEEP Welbeck and
Giroud as super subs.
Giroud as super sub for now.
Giroud as super sub, Sanchez / Perez as starters and we will be in business.
A lot of people might disagree with me on this but i personally would want Theo to continue developing and playing as a striker and replace Giroud for this coming season, use
Giroud as a super sub coming in after 60 - 70 mins of play.
Not exact matches
... Don't get me wrong,
giroud should play, but he should do so
as a
super sub!
Play Laca
as a central striker so he can get used to the PL and his team mates
as soon
as possible, bring
Giroud in
as super sub.
I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was
Giroud bought to become a
super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called
super sub.A player like
Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a
super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him
as a
super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started
Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal
as the top club who'd be crying over
Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.
I still don't see how he is a
super sub.He's labelled
as a
super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him
as a
super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.
Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In
Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches
as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.
Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are
as good in the air.
A player like
Giroud is not really a
super sub ok.He is is just not a
super sub.The one who i really call a
super sub in the team is Rosicky.He actually is.I am not going to waste my time talking about how good or not he is
as it is really plain for everyone to see.The truth shall set you free.There are players in our squad that are not good enough yet fans support them and complain when we win nothing.Let those who have ears hear.
Wenger please give
Giroud a contract extension if he is ready to come on
as a
super sub and score goals for us.
So while that keeps happening and
Giroud keeps scoring
as a
super sub, why should Wenger change a winning formula?
Some supporters can never be pleased, I am happy with how
Giroud has performed this season
as a
super sub and I know many other supporters who are also happy with
Giroud.
Giroud is better utilized like he was today,
as a «
Super Sub».
Giroud is good
as a
super sub and he usually fights and does physical battle in the field when we are stuck, so we need to keep him.
Giroud came on and scored some goals
as a
super sub, which prompted Arsene to give him a run of games
as the starter through the middle.
Last season
Giroud went 12 PL matches in a row without a holding but all summer I was saying keep him
as a
Super Sub.
I have seen another sanchez on the right wing in the OX, walcot and
giroud should be used
as our
super subs after wenger gets that striker in that said transfer list,
Giroud proved himself time and again
as a
super sub for the Gunners this season and I feel he has it in him to keep doing so once again next season and that is a huge asset for any side to have in a long and arduous campaign with European games and two domestic cups to cope with
as well
as the league.
I thought Welbeck worked hard without the ball and he generally does work harder than
Giroud without the ball, kinda why
Giroud is a
super sub We need a CF who is hungry for goals though
as well
as being a great athlete.
I also forget to say get rid of wellbeck and bring back
giroud he is not good
as main striker but I miss him
as super sub he saved us so many points.
I personally would keep
Giroud as he showed more than Walcott & can be a
super sub!!
If
Giroud keeps playing
as a substitution at Arsenal for the rest of this season, he might still go to World Cup, but I'm afraid Deschamps would use him
as a
super sub as well.
In fact,
Giroud hopefully doesn't see the playing field because he should only come on
as a
super sub if we are losing.
The best way to utilize
Giroud in Arsenal is to use him
as a
super sub.
The only role I would be happy to see
Giroud in is
as a
super sub or occasional starter in the Europa league when we play in Kazakhstan and need to keep Lacaette fresh and injury free.
I like
Giroud a lot but I think he is better
as a
Super Sub.
If we get a new 9 then I can see him actually playing that person ahead of
Giroud and using Oli
as a
super sub, but that still doesn't solve him not being able to bring Ramsey off the bench.
There is also
Giroud for some games and
as a
super sub.
Giroud has come off the bench eight times in EPL games this campaign, so is still a part of Wenger's plans and the fact he did so well
as a
super sub last year may not have done
Giroud any favours but he must feel that his talents are not being utilised enough.
And
as Wenger goes snooping around for more reinforcements,
Giroud has told French media he will not settle for being used
as a «
super sub» anymore: