Sentences with phrase «girouds average season»

Not exact matches

Oh and Giroud 1st season: Average striker with good hold - up play.

11 goals and 10 assists may be deemed a poor season for Morata, but dare I say those results would be deemed as average for Giroud, just showing how much of an upgrade Morata would be for the Gunners!

if Giroud, average striker can score 15/16 every season then I will wager my mortgage Aubermeyang will score over 20....

I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was Giroud bought to become a super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called super sub.A player like Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him as a super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal as the top club who'd be crying over Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.

Look ate Chelsea they sold Lukaku, Mata and De Bruyne who were not good enough at that time and signed better players like Hazard, Fabregas, Costa and Kante and have won 2 league titles in 3 seasons whereas Arsenal are still stuck with average players like Debuchy, Mertesaker, Gibbs, Ramsey, Theo, Giroud forever and have zero ambition of winning.

We have scored an average of 2.4 goals per game this season, scoring 48 goals in our 20 competitive matches thus far, and with Alexis Sanchez and Olivier Giroud sharing our striker role, there is no reason why that should change in the near future.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

I like both Welbeck and Lucas but don't really understand why we got them as Welbeck wasn't an improvement and Lucas was a gamble because he is 28 and only 1 good season (also he hardly starts even though he has performed well) we should have got a WC Forward in past few years Now we have: Alexis, Giroud, Welbeck, Lucas, Iwobi, Ox, Walcott, Akpom, Sanogo, Campbell We are collecting average to good players (except Alexis who is WC) In order to get another WC forward we need to get rid of a few of the above for funds and clear up wages.

Alexis WC winger but had a bad season to his standards Giroud Very good but not excellent like Vardy, Lukaku and Kane Walcott???? Welbeck Good (slightly above above average but still plenty of time to improve)

After that you can then go and spend 30 - 50 million on a striker that would give you 3 - 5 more goals per season on average when compared to Giroud.

Well according to whoscored Giroud has never scored 20 goals and has never provided more than 8 assists in a season as an arsenal player and this is his 4th season with Arsenal so it is not true that he he averages 20 goals and 15 assists.

The thing abour striker and dm in our situation is that we cant rely on a average striker in Giroud and force Coquelin to play the full season all by himsels.

Holding the only positive this season, mustafi and xhaka simply average we should rip the black cats into shreds they are only playing for pride just like us.The black cats reached their 9th life this season no more survival in the epl Arsenal 3:0 Sunderland, time to scout Pickford they have a better striker than arsenals Giroud in Defoe going to championship

Meanwhile Giroud has been extraordinarily AVERAGE for the past 3 seasons and some think he is better than Falcao and Benzema (because of some useless statistics and ignoring the fact that Madrid do everything for RONALDO to score while Arsenal do everything for GIROUD to score and he fails time and time and aGiroud has been extraordinarily AVERAGE for the past 3 seasons and some think he is better than Falcao and Benzema (because of some useless statistics and ignoring the fact that Madrid do everything for RONALDO to score while Arsenal do everything for GIROUD to score and he fails time and time and aGIROUD to score and he fails time and time and again).

Giroud scores over 20 per season on average.

I'll accept Benzema is «miles better» than Giroud, prettier to watch, faster, more tricks, better highlight reels, plays for a sexier team but you have got to get pretty creative to explain his 14.5 league goal average per season and explain why that is worth a # 40M punt.

So its an insult to Falcao and other world class players that when they have 1 bad season out of 5, they are told that average players like Giroud are better.

No, if say Aguero or Costa or Ibrahimovic and other world class players had a dip in form or one bad season and fickle ignorant idiots felt free to compare average players like Giroud and conclude he is better because he is their wallpaper idol then I would step in and correct such shallow conclusions.

That shows that Giroud is average because it takes Falcao or Aguero and other world class strikers to have a horrible season for them to be compared to Giroud.

Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.

I'm with you there mate.He's just an average player beign given many chances.A lot of average strikers can even do better because of the chances Arsenal creates.There are some strikers who are not top quality but have very good finishing that if given the same seasons and chances Giroud has had they can do better.I hate it when they make it seem like only world class strikers are better than him.He's really only improved from season 14/15 honestly speaking.He used to be so bad and waste a lot of chances.It's just that become can not see the fact that he's not as good as they think.We will surely be vindicated by his performance for another club.

Wilshere is over rated, Ox is still young and lost, Ramsey only one good season and flopped, Giround and Welbek are average especially Giroud, Sanogo (cant even explain)

Many of our players have been average this season koscienly bellerin giroud and sanchez fall into that list.Cazorla at times too Whilst ramsey walcott and chamberlain have been mediocre.

Atleast welbeck is trying Many of our players have been average this season koscienly bellerin giroud and sanchez fall into that list.Cazorla at times too Whilst ramsey walcott and chamberlain have been mediocre.

Giroud is averaging a goal every 65 minutes in the Premier League this season (four goals in 259 minutes) and has scored five goals in his last three Premier League starts.

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

Giroud has improved, but in general our strikers have been average / poor this season and this I feel is where our downfall has been... lack of goals.

Giroud is awful no matter how many times you defend him he'll keep messing up, every Arsenal game Giroud gets on average about 5 chances at goal but he can't even score 1, let me remind you that including end of last season in the last 11 Arsenal games Giroud has scored once!

i agree with what giroud said except for one thing he didn, t have a great season with us more like decent / average!!

The following season however, he became the prolific striker we've known him to be but when he left the Los Blancos for Napoli in 2013, he scored 35 goals in 69 games between then and the end of the 2015 season which is decent and slightly better than Giroud's average during that same time.

Giroud on average does score 20 goals a season for the Gunners, which isn't exactly a bad figure.

Giroud has done well for average striker but we need striker the most next season.

observations, corner kick for arsenal means nothing, do nt think we will score from a corner all season, second observation - this is what this team looks like when alexi's goals go dry, girouds season average of 13 GPM wont cut it, point three should have let theo go, pedros style would have suited arsenal w giroud coming off the bench.

Wenger relied on average strikers since Ozil came because Wenger refused to get a Top striker Giroud and Walcott were simply not good enough Ozil could have beaten Henry's assist record last season IF Wenger had got a Top striker We could have won the PL last season IF Wenger had got a Top striker

Don't kid yourself there.Giroud is not the one benching Lacazette in France National team.It's Griezmann.Giroud is also an average player.It's just good service which is making him look good.If he was in any of the smaller clubs it's not like we'd be wishing to sign him.Lacazette is exponentially a better player than Giroud.He just needs time and I hope he doesn't share it with Giroud just like the way Giroud had his time.He's been average over the past seasons yet fans would bring up stats defending him while calling Walcott who has the same impressive stats as average.Isn't it a disgrace for Walcott to start over you in CF?If Arsenal were serious we wpuld've sold Giroud and Welbeck then used the money to get reliable back ups who are not inconsistent.

We have had average Giroud for 4 seasons now — there were lots of expensive options over those 8 transfer windows, we were told we had the money, where is the upgrade?

In the time that he's been with Arsenal Giroud has Averaged 20 goals per season in all competitions.

Ramsey n Giroud helped us last season in goal, we played well today, but no goal to cap it up, when we had RVP and Adebayo togeda we didn't go anywhere talkless of now that we depend on only Welbek (average striker).

Quality is not all about goals or stats you know.If it was a lot of Arsenal players would have been sold and many players would not even be regarded.People need to look at the bigger picture.He scored 16 goals last two season as the starting CF.You and I know that based on the chances he gets he should've been doing better.The guy is not even a clinical player from what we watch yet people will always deny that fact.The only case people make up for Giroud is his goals.They can't even talk about his quality on the ball and others because it's non existent.He was part of the reason why Arsenal couldn't win the trophy in 15/16 season.It's a shame we are compromising and refuse to state things the way they are.Even if Giroud scores 40 goals in the EPL qualoty wise he's still average.

Giroud does not deserve to lead the arsenal line next season.He should be replaced do u know why?It is because he is always going to miss a lot of chances and will cost us.people who support him to lead the line have not studied his game clearly.every season he will continue to cost us.But at least i wont say he is useless or something.He is on the pitch and gives his all so he is useful.He is not clinical and not good at all.He is a striker who is just above average but sometimes even performs below average in his 3 years over here.Be honest and say it as it is.Some people use stats to constantly defend him yet if you watch him you will be shocked.Walcott can lead the line he has everything to.but as i said he lacks the aggressiveness and physique to be the main man.that will go against him so many times.so its better for him to remain on the wings.Giroud does not deserve it.We all know that.

Because if we are why are we effectively being forced to accept average, we pay the most in terms of match day tickets and season tickets and your telling me the best this «big club» can do is Giroud, who is pretty average of you ask me.

VERY TRUE, giroud and rvp both don't have pace but rvp's tactical know how, positioning and finishing is world class, giroud's is EXTREMELY average, definitely something he can change, do I believe he will is a whole different question, he had 2 FULL seasons to learn, uninterrupted by injury and unlimited game time, instead of working hard, grabbing the opportunity with both hands and learning, olivier was banging some model, talking to the press and rolling on the ground after 15 misses with his tongue, U TELL ME WHY HE SHOULD I GIVE HIM MY TRUST AND BELIEF?

Debuchy, jekinson, Gibbs, coquelin he let hazard to demolish us, Gabriel, cazorla no help two seasons now, Welbeck he's injury prone average player of 5 goals, sanogo, Szczeny, ospina, Ox, Giroud in mpappe for ox, perez for Giroud, Belotti for Welbeck, kosaniac for Gibbs only three players needed striker, winger and full back 3.

Did any of you guys see the analysis of Giroud from last season, on multiple occasions we had possession in their half lasting maybe an average of 4/5 minutes — during this period Giroud made on average 6/7 good runs anticipating the cross... but it never came.

lets not point guns at wenger yes he is too simple on players but why do nt we look at players who are not arsenal quality d players who do nt know the value of being at a big club like arsenal talking of giroud who on average scores 13.6 goals per season and yet you have the best midfielders in the league and probably the best number 10 in the world who creates 400 chances of scoring goals and you utilize only 13.6.

funny how the article points out that lorente scored 18 goals in his debut season and he wasn't even a starter yet our big guy has never scored more than 16 in the 3 seasons he has been a starter for us... if that doesn't proof how average he is, then giroud must have confessing powers and has confessed you so you probably love him deeply... we do nt need lorente maybe benzema but i prefer lewandowski

Benzema has far more to his game then goals!!!!!! His shot conversion is 22 % to girouds 12 % his also creates a hell of a lot more chances, with an average of 8 - 11 per game where as giroud has been no more then 4 last season, he also beats giroud with ran ons and knock downs and also beats giroud with asists

We have Per who is slowing down (if that were possible), Arteta who is 33 and never was a spectacular player (never made it to Spain team) as our DM cover and Giroud who has been leading our line with an average of 15 goals per season.

If you want to paint a picture to compare Giroud to Rooney paint it over a similar time what that guy was doing earlier was averaged his goal ratio over Rooney's 11 year period in the league instead of the last 3 years in which Giroud played in the BPL, Oh on Average in the last 3 season Now Rooney has just scored 23.3 Goals a season to Girouds 15..

Im not sure what stats ur looking at but when it comes to movement behind defenders Giroud is average due to his lack of pace, a team like us can not survive against the big beasts of Europe with a striker with no pace, but hey we've known this since his first season