Global Imports goes above and beyond in reconditioning our certified cars to where you literally can not tell in many cases the car is not brand new.
Not exact matches
The
global economy isn't
going to diminish in importance, but we're tracking — more anecdotally than statistically at this point — a growing aversion to
imported goods in many categories, particularly when logic says there should be made - in - America available.
BTW I think the L&G
Global fund actually tracks an «ex-UK» index, so that may risk too much on the correlation with non-UK bonds (especially if we continue to
import inflation with a weak currency... don't
go there).
Why is it that the same companies / transnational corporations that are polluting the earth with their
imported useless crap products, designed with a limited service use and all the byproducts that
go along with, shipped all over the globe before it ends up in the hands of the end user, are also the same ones who get to take a seat at tables like COP15 / 16, and are allowed to pass off bogus data as fact, as pretext for a
global carbon tax and trading scheme?
Even without a
global agreement, the imposition of a domestic carbon tax — coupled with taxes on
imports to reflect the carbon taxes that would have paid had the
imported product been produced or manufactured in the United States — would, per Joseph Stiglitz (chapter 6), provide a powerful incentive for countries to impose their own carbon taxes to capture the revenue that would otherwise
go to the U.S. Treasury.
Especially since 2002 is the warmest (at least globally with the GHCN - ERSST data) I prefer to look at 1880 -LRB--.2) to 2006 (+.3) off
global mean for the period and it's clear to see the trend globally
going from -.4 to +.3 The only questions then left are what is the meaning (and / or
import) of the sudden changes since 1980, what changing a total of.005 C a year during the period means, what impact does increasing urbanization globally and additional industrialization in places like India and China contribute, why the drop from +.6 to +.3, and why not a constant increase from year to year, given the elevated CO2 levels.