Sentences with phrase «global improvement scale»

Severity of illness (global symptom severity scale), change in symptoms (clinical global improvement scale), and social functioning (Sheehan Disability Scale).

Change in score on 12 primary measures: Clinician - Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS 2) total of 3 clusters and severity, Impact of Events Scale (IES)(self rated), Beck Depression Inventory (self rated), Global Improvement scale (self and assessor rated), main problem (self and assessor rated), total of 4 goals to deal with the problem (self and assessor rated), and Work and Social Adjustment scale (self and assessor rated).

Not exact matches

He also managed large - scaled business improvement projects for Global 1000 companies, concentrating on airlines, manufacturers and retailers.

At its heart is the idea to make the most of the scale of the North, by better linking it together through transport improvement, creating one single economy that can compete on the global stage.

This is the most significant improvement in global fuel standards for the shipping industry in 100 years, intended to achieve significant health benefits on a global scale.

He received the Ko Awatea International Excellence Award for Leading Health Improvement on a Global Scale.

Using research capabilities from MIT and other leading universities, the effectiveness of the learning apps is measured to ensure the continuous improvement of every child's learning and to reach their aim of spreading literacy on a global scale.

From ambitious beginnings as the Centre for British Teachers in 1968 to today's Education Development Trust, a major force in education improvement on a global scale — under the leadership of Patrick Brazier, we remain focussed on our mission to transform lives by improving education around the world.

Veterinarians should be acknowledged for their contribution to the improvement of veterinary medicine on a global scale.

Margaret Gould Stewart, Facebook's director of product design, outlines three rules for design at such a massive scale — one so big that the tiniest of tweaks can cause global outrage, but also so large that the subtlest of improvements can positively impact the lives of many.

At tenfold improvements to present costs, and, setting aside the need to conduct a two century long global project without interruption, deployment on a global scale, dropping 300 ppm in atmosphere (equivalent to 750 ppm overall) is by one calculation available at a cost of double the Gross World Product in 2014.

It presents detailed country - level and global data that outline the scale of the challenges ahead as countries try to meet the three objectives of the Sustainable Energy for All Initiative: providing universal access to modern energy, doubling the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix, and doubling the rate of improvement in energy efficiency — all by 2030.

Tags for this Online Resume: P&L Management, Operations / Quality Management, Leadership / Talent Development, Productivity / Process Improvement, Contract / SLA Administration, Global Sourcing, RFP / Pricing / Sales Support, Strategic Planning, Risk / Business Continuity Management, Client Consulting, C - Level / Executive Relations and Presentation Skills, Project / Program Management, Organizational Change Management, Client Retention, P&L / Financial Management, Building and Leading Teams, Productivity Improvement / Cost Reduction, Business Process / Service Delivery Improvement (Lean, Six Sigma), Client Management and Consulting, Large Scale Project / Program / Implementation Management, Organization and Client Change Management, Client Retention, Revenue Growth, RFP, Pricing, and Sales Support, Managing and Developing Talent

Self - motivated, well - rounded project management professional with an established history of process and quality improvement having more than 10 years of experience managing successful program initiatives and large - scale projects for organizations ranging from small consulting firms to global, multi-billion dollar engineering firms looking to apply knowledge and skills in a new area of project management.

Here is a great role for a Maintenance Engineer who wants to be involved in automated systems and work on technically interesting state of the art equipment The company are a global leader in automated systems and partner with blue chip manufacturers to support them with the onsite automated facilities to product high levels of production output The role itself involves onsite maintenance at a major and highly automated production facility where you will be accountable for PPM, reactive maintenance, fault finding, programming (will be training on this) and continuous improvements projects This is a fantastic chance to join a world leader where you can quickly become top of your game on cutting edge automated equipment on a large scale The Role: * Maintenance Engineer * PPM, Reactive, Continuous Improvements * Automated equipment and PLC's The Person: * Maintenance Engineer * Electrical bias * Experience of PLC's This vacancy is being advertised by Rise Technical Recruimprovements projects This is a fantastic chance to join a world leader where you can quickly become top of your game on cutting edge automated equipment on a large scale The Role: * Maintenance Engineer * PPM, Reactive, Continuous Improvements * Automated equipment and PLC's The Person: * Maintenance Engineer * Electrical bias * Experience of PLC's This vacancy is being advertised by Rise Technical RecruImprovements * Automated equipment and PLC's The Person: * Maintenance Engineer * Electrical bias * Experience of PLC's This vacancy is being advertised by Rise Technical Recruitment Ltd..

Primary outcome: treatment response defined variably; number of patients with at least a 50 % reduction from baseline score on a condition relevant scale: the Hamilton Anxiety Scale for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), the Panic Disorder Severity Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 scale: the Hamilton Anxiety Scale for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), the Panic Disorder Severity Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 Scale for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), the Panic Disorder Severity Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 or 2.

Improvement in symptoms of depression (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised, Clinical Global Impressions improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High SchooImprovement in symptoms of depression (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised, Clinical Global Impressions improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High Schooimprovement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High School Version).

Responders (much improved or very much improved) based on the Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement Item and mean change from baseline on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale total score.

Analysis of covariance showed that compared with the TAU group, the IPT - A group showed significantly fewer clinician - reported depression symptoms on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (P =.04), significantly better functioning on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions sScale (P =.04), significantly better functioning on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions sScale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions sScale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions scalescale.

The primary outcome was clinical response defined using a global rating scale (eg, «much improved» or «very much improved» on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)global rating scale (eg, «much improved» or «very much improved» on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-scale (eg, «much improved» or «very much improved» on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Global Impression Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-Scale (MADRS)-RRB-.

Proportion of responders at end of treatment or at study endpoint if treatment was longer than 6 weeks (based on score improvements on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD), the Clinical Global Impression index (CGI), rating as at least «much improved» on global improvement subscale, Depression Scale von Zerssen (DS) or any other clinical response measure); safety (proportion of dropouts due to adverse evGlobal Impression index (CGI), rating as at least «much improved» on global improvement subscale, Depression Scale von Zerssen (DS) or any other clinical response measure); safety (proportion of dropouts due to adverse evglobal improvement subscale, Depression Scale von Zerssen (DS) or any other clinical response measure); safety (proportion of dropouts due to adverse events).

Treatment response (defined as ≥ 50 % reduction in score on the HAM - D or Montgomery - Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] or a rating of very much improved or much improved on the Clinical Global Impressions scale for Improvement [CGI - I]-Scale [MADRS] or a rating of very much improved or much improved on the Clinical Global Impressions scale for Improvement [CGI - I]-scale for Improvement [CGI - I]-RRB-.

Primary outcomes were response (Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] scale improvement rating) and depressive symptoms (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised [CDRS - R]-RRB- which were measured weekly by clinicscale improvement rating) and depressive symptoms (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised [CDRS - R]-RRB- which were measured weekly by clinicScale - Revised [CDRS - R]-RRB- which were measured weekly by clinicians.

Primary efficacy measure: response (Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI - I) score of very much or much improved based on the assessor's perception of improvement, anxiety scale scores and patient self - repScale - Improvement (CGI - I) score of very much or much improved based on the assessor's perception of improvement, anxiety scale scores and patient selfImprovement (CGI - I) score of very much or much improved based on the assessor's perception of improvement, anxiety scale scores and patient selfimprovement, anxiety scale scores and patient self - repscale scores and patient self - report).

Validity was assessed against several established measures of social anxiety, global assessments of severity and improvement, and scales assessing physical health and disability.

Measures utilized include the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC - IV), the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP - IV) Questionnaire, the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI - I), the Conners» 10 - item scale and the Family Burden of Illness Module (FScale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC - IV), the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP - IV) Questionnaire, the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI - I), the Conners» 10 - item scale and the Family Burden of Illness Module (Fscale and the Family Burden of Illness Module (FBIM).

Global improvement was rated on a seven point scale from very much better to very much worse.

Self rated global improvement at final follow up (table 2) was consistent with outcome on the other measures of fatigue, social adjustment scale, mood, and fear.

The main outcome was attendance at school at least 75 % of the time and a fatigue score of less than 4.20 Subsidiary outcomes included the social adjustment questionnaire, 21 the hospital anxiety and depression scale, 22 the fear questionnaire, 23 and global self ratings of improvement and satisfaction with treatment.

Measures utilized include the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th Edition, the Expressive Vocabulary Test, 2nd Edition, the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM — IV, child and parent versions (ADIS - C / P), the Clinical Global Impression — Severity (CGI - S), the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBDRS), the Behavior Assessment System for Children — Second Edition (BASC), the Parent Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Clinical Global Impression — Improvement (CGI - I).

Measures utilized include the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS - C - IV), Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS), Spence Children's Anxiety Scale — Parent Version (SCAS - P), Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale (CALIS), Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (S - MFQ), Becks Youth Inventories (BYI), Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ), Children's Automatic Thought Scale (CATS), Self - Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) for parents, Rearing Behavior Questionnaire (RBQ), Clinical Global Impression — Improvement Scale (CGI - I) and Children's Global Assessment Scale (C - GAS).

Measures utilized include the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS - C - IV), Screen for Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED), Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI - I), Children's Global Assessment Scale (C - GAS), Parent Consumer Satisfaction Scale, and the Barriers to Treatment Participation Scales.

Measures utilized include the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School - Age Children - Epidemiologic version (K - SADS - E), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised, the Parent - Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI), the Parenting Stress Index (PSI), the Oppositional Defiant Disorder Rating Scale (ODDRS), and the Clinical Global Impression — Improvement (CGI - I).

Response (score of 1 or 2 (much or very much improved) on the Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement scale); symptom severity or investigator defined response on closely related measures; symptom severity (clinician rated DSM based anxiety scales such as the Child Yale - Brown Obsessive - Compulsive Scale); adverse evscale); symptom severity or investigator defined response on closely related measures; symptom severity (clinician rated DSM based anxiety scales such as the Child Yale - Brown Obsessive - Compulsive Scale); adverse evScale); adverse events.

Presence and severity of child primary anxiety disorder (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM - IV, child / parent versions), improvement in child presentation of anxiety (Clinical Global Impression — Improvement scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months postimprovement in child presentation of anxiety (Clinical Global Impression — Improvement scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months postImprovement scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treatscale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treatScale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treatscale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treatment.

The authors also found that, using a global emotional and motivational scaffolding scale, mothers demonstrated improved co-regulation (i.e. higher ratings of global motivational and emotional scaffolding, higher frequency of more adaptive strategies such as redirection of attention) over the course of the intervention, and that this was also associated with improvements in toddler emotion regulation (i.e. less expressed negativity and avoidance).