I documented this pattern in a book published one year ago this month, subtly titled «Red Hot Lies: How
Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud and Deception to Keep You Misinformed.»
Mr. Horner, the author of «Red Hot Lies: How
Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed,» noted that he had proudly quoted Greenpeace calling him a «climate criminal» on the cover of that book, published in 2008.
Horner outlines the details in his 2008 book Red Hot Lies: How
Global Warming Alarmist Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep you Misinformed.
Not exact matches
However, when people
use the term «catastrophic anthropogenic
global warming» they are not referring to any real science but are attempting to paint anyone who talks about the science as an
alarmist.
... The
global warming alarmists could not pursist without their endless
use of fear, scare and dire predictions; most of which are based on faulty computer programs.
We the citizens (including all you
global warming alarmists) can continue
using one of the greatest life - enhancing resources ever discovered.
So I take it that the consensus view is that according to our best current scientific understanding, there is no possibility whatsoever of any catastrophic consequences of anthropogenic
global warming; therefore to
use the word «catastrophic» is irresponsible alarmism;, and therefore the deniers are actually quite right to accuse anyone who suggests that such outcomes are possible of being an irresponsible
alarmist.
He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible
use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on
global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as
alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the
global warming debate.
«I've seen Al Gore's film twice, but I've also read Michael Crichton's State of Fear, which makes a compelling case on the other side,» says Hug, referring to the controversial 2004 novel in which Crichton —
using scientific arguments that were hotly challenged by critics — ridiculed the
global -
warming consensus as the work of conspiratorial
alarmists.
«We should be growing more trees and
using more wood,» says Moore, but the
global warming alarmists refer to the forests as «carbon stocks» that must not be
used.
The climate
alarmists have exploited the public's understandable lack of knowledge concerning climate science to argue that the developed countries (but usually not less developed countries) should give up some or preferably all fossil fuel
use in order to avoid alleged catastrophic anthropogenic
global warming (CAGW).
NCSE isn't composed of scientists or science teachers; it's an activist group devoted, in part, to expounding
global warming alarmists» dogma: Humans are causing climate change; the results will be catastrophic; and governments must force people to
use less energy and live simpler to prevent future disasters.
As such,
alarmists aren't just questioning the value of continuing the
global warming debate; their approach also calls into question the scientific method, which has been
used successfully in its current form since the Enlightenment.
''
Global warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat - Earthers... you know it
used to be it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier,»
While
global warming alarmists continue to fantasize crude oil
use getting drastically reduced already starting next year, OPEC sees it totally differently.
«To Gavin [Schmidt] and the other
alarmists, it appears, a piece that is fair and balanced can make no mention of any other opinion except that carbon dioxide is causing
global warming and action is needed now and will deliver gain and no pain, something the one sided media coverage has gotten them
used to over the years,» D'Aleo wrote on January 13, 2009.
Looking for any evidence that humanity is cooking the globe, Jiansong Zhou and Ka - Kit Tung (Deducing Multi-decadal Anthropogenic
Global Warming Trends
Using Multiple Regression Analysis) began by excluding climate change due to natural factors and more specifically, by adding the effects of AMO (Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation) trends that
alarmists neglected to consider.
It is true that
global warming alarmists are filing multiple lawsuits to
use the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act to cause a regulatory trainwreck...
The Green Policy Fairness Coalition already cites efforts by
global warming alarmists to
use lawsuits against the federal and state governments bypass the legislative process.
Imagine the uproar if the phrase «
global warming denier» made its way into a textbook for students, as the term «
global warming alarmist»,
used to describe rather mainstream scientific views, is prevalent in Rapp's silly book.
Now
alarmists use summer 2012 melt to bolster their failed anthropogenic
global warming (AGW) hypothesis.
After becoming fed up with the childish and dangerous tactics of
alarmists, particularly the
use of the term «climate denier,» Spencer said that the «
global -
warming Nazis» were in fact threatening millions of lives — especially among the poor — with their «pseudo-scientific ramblings» and support for fascist - style «radical policies» supposedly aimed at combating «
global warming.»
Who among hot climatists will want to commit to writing a desire to collaborate in figuring out a way to discredit the more accurate satellite data that shows no
global warming going on 2 decades in preference to greater reliance on the
use of massaged land - based temperature records that support the
global warming alarmists» meme that free enterprise capitalism is destroying the Earth?