Sentences with phrase «global warming skeptics often»

Global warming skeptics often cite contradictory reports from a generation ago warning of global cooling.

Not exact matches

Given that skeptics, taken as a whole, put forward a nearly infinite variety of often conflicting and contradictory beliefs regarding global warming and climate science, exactly what is a climate scientist supposed to agree with?

It has been often said by climate skeptics that the modern warming peaked in 1998 and we are entering a period of decades of global cooling.

Many skeptics contend that liberal environmental agendas are behind alarming global - warming headlines, though often skeptics bring policy agendas of their own.

This statement is often used as a litmus test for belief regarding global warming, i.e. you believe this statement (consensus) or you don't (skeptic).

Now, since 2007, at the height of the global warming scare tactics about arctic sea ice, the antarctic sea ice extents anomaly CONTINUOUSLY exceeds 1.25 Mkm ^ 2 for 3 years straight now, and is larger than 1.5 Mkm ^ 2 so often for such long times that it is not even newsworthy on a skeptic site.

People who challenge the claims of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are often labeled «global warming skeptics».

As Figure 1 shows, over the last 37 years one can identify overlapping short windows of time when climate «skeptics» could have argued (and often did, i.e. here and here and here) that global warming had stopped.

The claim is often made that climate realists (a.k.a. skeptics) can not point to peer - reviewed papers to support their position that there is no evidence of «dangerous global warming:» caused by human emissions of so - called «greenhouse» gases, including carbon dioxide.

The two make a range of often - repeated claims by climate change skeptics, including that there have been «no increase in frequency or intensity of storms, floods or droughts,» that sea ice isn't melting considerably, and that there is supposedly no scientific consensus regarding global warming.

Weakening Solar Output Won't Slow Warming Over Next Century One argument often cited by climate skeptics and global warming deniers is that solar cycles are responsible for at least part of the warming we're seeiWarming Over Next Century One argument often cited by climate skeptics and global warming deniers is that solar cycles are responsible for at least part of the warming we're seeiwarming deniers is that solar cycles are responsible for at least part of the warming we're seeiwarming we're seeing now.

Their paper notes, in spite of the fact that «the scientific consensus on global warming and climate change is remarkable,» journalists — especially on television — often treat it as «an unsettled controversy,» giving equal time to climatologists and skeptics.