Sentences with phrase «go public team»

The Go Public team of forty professional film crews and ten student film crews covered every school in the district on May 8th, 2012.

Not exact matches

Chesky said he and his team are «working on making sure the company is ready to go public» — a process, he said, they consider a two - year project.

Many of the CEOs and leadership teams I have worked with over the years have fallen into the same trap: they get overly focused on selling their company to a strategic or financial acquirer or worse, going public.

«When I heard the team [at Tanium] was looking to expand the board, I really went for it in terms of pursuing it as an opportunity,» said Chadwick, who five years ago joined the board of F5 Networks (ffiv), a public cybersecurity firm that provides software to data centers.

In his comments, some of which were shared via Twitter by reporters and Uber's own communications team, also Khosrowshahi noted the downside of going public was the attention to metrics every quarter.

As KFC was scrambling to get its supplier issue under control, its PR team went to work and did something spectacular that might just give the company a little breathing room with the public.

Merger agreement in hand (and the money in escrow), Cline spent the next five months on the road trying to win over CEA's investors, who were looking for a growth company that was well - positioned to go public, preferably with a strong management team and a few years of audited financials.

By always working in advance, a team also has the opportunity to tweak posts as needed before they go public.

Our public high school has a sports team going on a mission trip this summer.

She's the same Oprah that teamed up with Bono to sell red iPods, went to a public school, and got upset because all the kids (since they look up to her) wanted iPods.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

The best - value bets can often be found by going against these teams because the oddsmakers adjust the line to reflect the expected weight of public money; so that the underdog is often quested at better odds or receives a larger point spread than is warranted.

Betting Against The Public The logic is simple: whichever team the public loads up on, go the othePublic The logic is simple: whichever team the public loads up on, go the othepublic loads up on, go the other way.

For our spread system, road teams receiving no more than 30 % of public bets have gone 429 - 353 (54.9 %) with +55.71 units won and a 7.1 % ROI.

Last week, the Public went 5 - 3 in «lopsided - bet games,» which are defined as games having 65 % or more bets on one team.

We could and should have brought in a replacement for Cazorla in January not only for the sole purpose of replacing Cazorla but to give the team a boost and fresh ideas, the players, coach / manager contract and board should have gone out to the public to reassure the public everything would be signed at the end of the season (even if it was a lie).

We could have stopped this 2 seasons ago, now we must pay consequence, we want team that can win big things, we already have it, we just need someone who will lead them to that goal, you cant win trophys when your manager go in public and says our opponents are just too good, its not that chelsea is unbeateble, our manager has no desire anymore, and i do nt blame him for that, he is just doing his job, we fans are final judge, if you are ok with 4 place, than enjoy this mediocre simple!!!

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

But if, back at the beginning of the season, you'd asked yourself where Arsenal would be as February began, you'd have answered «about fourth, having been a bit higher, coming off the back of a quiet transfer window and a disappointing result at home, with tricky away games to come, and with the pendulum of public opinion just starting to make its way back from «finest team the world has ever seen'to «thank you, Arsène, but it's time to go.»»

Same goes for fading the public on opening day, with teams getting < 30 of bets struggling to a 13 - 42 record for - 23 units.

To check this hypothesis, I went back to my Bet Labs system and added the «spread percentage» filter to look only at teams receiving between 0 and 35 % of public bets.

The Red Raiders» fans are going to attempt to give the Longhorns the silent treatment Saturday to try and help their team to victory, but there is overwhelming support for the Longhorns from the public.

When Calipari lost to UNC in 2015, he attacked the refs for causing the best players on his team to dwell on the bench with foul trouble.When Calipari had a very public fight with John Chaney, the legendary Temple coach, it was about threatening the refs with losing their jobs when he was at UMass.Two of the schools he coached were hit with NCAA sanctions but of course Calipari's hands are always clean.He is the Teflon basketball coach.Calipari is not an X's and O's type of coach and makes poor adjustments during games.Frankly I don't understand why so many people think this arrogant bloviating fool is a good coach.You will say, well he went to 4 final fours and one Championship.One.....

Christian Horner and Geri Halliwell caused quite a stir when they went public with their relationship back in March, with the Red Bull Racing team principal having split from his girlfriend of 14 years.

The team getting the majority of spread tickets went just 1 - 4 ATS in those games, further proving how crucial it is to look at ticket #'s when fading the public.

It's been a solid start for public bettors this season — teams closing with at least 70 % of tickets have gone 67 - 50 ATS.

Teams receiving less than 40 % of tickets have gone 11 - 6 ATS, but betting is currently 52 % / 48 % right now so it doesn't appear that there will be a chance to fade the public.

For over a decade, the team at Sports Insights has gone to great lengths to conclusively prove that betting against the public will produce positive returns for sports bettors.

Sportsbooks are now shading their lines towards American League teams based on public perception, which means this could be an excellent opportunity to go against the grain and buy low on NL teams — especially in games with low totals.

When you bet against the public in the NBA, you're never going to be taking teams like the Warriors, Spurs, or Cavs... unless Ty Lue decides to rest every starter, which is about once a week.

-- The public had its first great week of the year, with teams receiving > 65 % of bets going 25 - 10 ATS.

Since 2005, teams receiving less than 40 % of public bets have gone just 2,472 - 2,563 ATS (49.1 %) with -215.01 units lost and a -4.3 % return on investment (ROI).

Obviously, public bettors are going to gravitate towards the big well - known teams: Duke, UNC, Kentucky, Kansas... perhaps Louisville once upon a time, but probably not this year.

At Sports Insights, we practice what we preach, routinely going against the public by taking the league's least popular teams.

OK so Joe Public bets the best teams... but the top 5 you highlight here went 33 - 31 so it is not exactly a disastrous way for the public Public bets the best teams... but the top 5 you highlight here went 33 - 31 so it is not exactly a disastrous way for the public public to go.

-- Betting against the public continues to be profitable with teams receiving less than 35 % of spread bets going 7 - 3 ATS in Week 1.

Since February 1, 2010, visiting teams receiving less than 35 % of public bets and getting 10 or more points have gone 43 - 20 (68.25 %) with 20.89 units earned.

Trend to know: Fading the public has been a sharp strategy in bowl season, with teams receiving less than 50 % of spread tickets going 228 -194-6 (54.0 %) ATS since 2005.

While the team is saying they won't acquiesce to such demands, public sympathy is probably not going to be on the side of a team that is jettisoning all of the positive features of its organization in order to make another buck.

When that low level of public support caused the line to improve by at least a half - point (i.e. moving from +2.5 to +3), that team has gone 88 - 49 ATS (64.2 %) with a 25.6 % return on investment (ROI).

Fading the public has been our leading philosophy throughout the years, and this season tourney teams getting < 40 % of spread bets have gone 14 - 7 ATS.

In those games, teams receiving overwhelming public support have gone 16 - 8 ATS including an 8 - 3 ATS record for major conference teams.

Public bettors are probably kicking themselves now because they've been the most profitable team in the entire league, going 7 - 1 for +8.49 units on the moneyline and breaking expansion team records along the way.

Last week was solid for public bettors as the most lopsided bet teams went 4 - 2.

Just 15 % of bettors are taking Hull at home so this is a great spot to really fade the public against a team who isn't that strong (West Brom) and I'll gladly go contrarian with Hull at +227 odds.

Week 2 was very profitable for Betting Against the Public in the NFL as teams receiving 30 % or fewer of spread wagers went a staggering 7 - 2 (77.8 %).

It can also be used to avoid going to a particular team, and knowing Papelbon's very public pro-winning team sentiments, he's not about to lift it to go to someone he thinks is going to lose.

Though the Pats are the most public team of the week, the line has actually gone towards the Bills and Nathan Peterman Tyrod Taylor.

Since 2005, NBA road teams have gone 7,053 - 6,776 ATS (51.0 %) and that record improves tremendously when they're being ignored by public bettors.

Good defensive teams that are underdogs and getting little public support (40 % or less of bets) have gone 31 -16-1 (66.0 %) ATS since 2005.