This cultural struggle of the people of God is the same as their struggle for the culture of their covenant with
God against the culture of the Egyptian Pharaoh.
Not exact matches
The revelational rap
against apologetic theology is that it either engages in a sellout to the «world» (the self - disclosure of
God being so utterly relativized by human wisdom that Christians are unable to tell atheists anything that they don't already know), or it is an exercise in various intellectual imperialisms, such as: «We can prove the existence of
God» or «If human
culture really understood itself, it would find that it is striving toward that which we already have.»
It is true that Jesus said little about «the world» except to warn
against letting its claims usurp the place of first loyalty to
God, and had almost nothing to say about particular features of contemporary Jewish or Roman
culture.
It seems that we are so used to writing
against things that we can not articulate well to the
culture what
God loves and what He has lovingly designed for our good!
But these are not seen as
gods, so we have difficulty understanding
cultures that rebel
against secularity and continue to maintain religious justification for their violence.
Altizer's position represents his attempt to grasp the inner logic of the Incarnation, though he is fully conscious of the fact that the profanity of contemporary
culture plays an essential role in his formulation of a radically immanental interpretation of Christ.31 He presents a telling case
against attempts in Christian theology to conceive
God as an immutable Absolute wholly unaffected by the contingencies of history.
A proper Christian response to
culture therefore, is not contrary to and
against culture, but alongside and with
culture as we recognize and applaud the whispering of the Spirit in their midst, and then help guide and train the movements of
God in
culture along the paths and truths of the gospel.
In the end, is not hope better than answers... but a materialistic
culture gets the
God it deserves... thx David for swimming
against the stream... good thots
In the previous episode, we really only saw that Moses was in fact writing a polemic
against the
gods of these other religions and
cultures.
For him the revelation of
God as attested by Scripture stands over
against contemporary human
culture, whether religious or secular, with the divine Word of promise and judgment.
The subversion (which means undermining and exposure to dismantling) is directed
against a theology that knows too much, a
God who is too strong, a church that is too allied with triumphalist
culture, and a ministry that moves too much from strength.
In practice, we can guard
against misconceptions of
God's will through ecumenical dialogue, not only with other Christians, but also with other
cultures and religions.
The movement of Jesus for the Reign of
God is a combined struggle
against the
culture of the Roman and Greek imperial powers and principalities, and
against the encroaching cultural pollution in the life of
God's people.
In this case, furthermore, the intended violence of Christians
against other Christians and
against non-Christians is something whose «results» include the calling down of
God's wrath upon the Church, part of which may well include the secularized crucible of what was once a «Christian
culture.»
The
culture of Baalism surrounded the people of
God; and the
culture of the imperial powers of Egypt, Babylon and Assyria encroached
against the kingdoms of Israel and Judah.
Nevertheless, in his latest book,
God in the Whirlwind, David goes some way to offering positive proposals
against the backdrop of traditional Reformed theology and pertinent critiques of contemporary
culture.
And when we see what
God is doing, we can join with
culture in standing
against war, hunger, and other forms of inhumanity, but infusing such stands with the principles of the Gospel and the example of Jesus Christ (Resident Aliens, 46 - 47).