Not exact matches
What we do know about all claims for
God's existence, and supposedly inherent qualities, is that they are all indelibly stamped
by the fears, wants, prejudices, errors, and
limitations of their obviously human authorship.
@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of
God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple
gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the
God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular
gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the
limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown»
God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of
God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that
God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of
God made
by men throughout history.
That is, while Griffin acknowledges that Plantinga affirms
limitations on
God's power in relation to possible worlds containing free human beings, he believes Plantinga to hold «that an actual world devoid of beings with some power of self - determination would be possible» and thus that
God could have created a world containing no evil simply
by creating a world containing no self - determined beings (GPE 271).
The whole church needs help in avoiding the depersonalization of
God as we seek to overcome the
limitations imposed on our Christian experience
by male - oriented language.
This aim is given to the occasion to determine its limits
by the principle of
limitation which transcends every temporal occasion and which Whitehead calls
God.
It is natural to assume that in
God's case the
limitations imposed
by men's spatiotemporal perspectives disappear.
This is
God as the principle of
limitation and the organ of novelty who achieves these ends
by his ordered envisagement of the realm of eternal objects.
All our thoughts, intentions and actions must be buttressed
by the kind of humility that acknowledges our
limitations as well as our incredible possibilities from
God's point of view.
It has been an attempt to suggest that the Western novel is haunted
by the story of Jesus, in the sense that like the hiddenness of
God in that human life, the image of human life in the Western novel is one in which human beings grapple with the transcendent through the inexorable
limitations of historical existence.
Already in the earlier books it is clear that
God functions as principle of
limitation by ordering the eternal objects.
We are no longer tortured
by the dreadful
limitations of man's life on this planet, and while as lovers of
God and lovers of man, we are bound to do all that we can to spread the invisible Kingdom here on earth, we know that both the foundation and the fulfillment of that Kingdom lie beyond the confines of our present situation.
The human imagination, battered and torn
by our fears and
limitations, comes from a
God who asks us to see ourselves and our world in a new way.
Again, the unspoken assumption is that what is important in the differences between religions has nothing to do with how close their theological descriptions of
God correspond to reality, either because those differences don't exist or because they are impossible for us to judge, differences too subtle to be detected
by us, lost in the «noise» of our human
limitations, personal history, genetics, and so on.
By trusting in
God (as hard as that has been for me), I have come to see that grasping a single simple truth as
God allows me works best for me — namely that
God is complete love and complete mercy and forgiveness without
limitation.
'' be transformed
by the renewing of your mind» indeed and any thoughts we have about
God are not
God yes, and these thoughts have human
limitation.
Rather, in my view, they are most faithfully engaged with as a collection of books written
by fallible human beings whose work bears the hallmarks of the
limitations and preconceptions of the times and the cultures they lived in, but also of the transformational experience of their encounters with
God.
Although we have been really invigorated
by refreshing or learning for the first time some of what has been seen in scripture, we still come up against the
limitations of our thinking and the lack of lots of explanation which
God has not revealed (as per Job).
Time to take my place as a «creature» again created
by God and recognize my
limitations, and humbly pray for the Great Physician to work this tragedy out for His glory.
But even this
limitation does not suffice to explain the creative fact of a synthesis of actualities conforming to a standard; there needs to be a
limitation of antecedent selection, the ordering of possibilities of actuality and value
by God (SMW 256, cf. UW 100f).
[Brightman's] notion of the Given as an intrinsic
limitation of
God's power, a passive element in his activity, analogous to sensation and emotion in us, can be defined and defended only in the context of an adequate analysis of what is or can be meant
by «passivity,» «sensation,» etc.; and the exploration of such concepts taken in their most fundamental or general senses, as they here must be, can only amount to a metaphysical system whose defense is not merely empirical, since the very meaning of «experience,» «facts,» etc., will have to be grounded in this system.54
I don't care if you're for baptism
by emersion or apple juice, are you aware of your
limitations as you stand before
God or holding up you're homework expecting an A +?
Whitehead's assertion that
God exemplifies the categories is not an assertion that in his relation to actual occasions he is bound
by all the
limitations that govern the relations of actual occasions with each other.
The
limitation of Hume's principle introduced
by the consideration of the Category of Conceptual Reversion... is to be construed as referring merely to the transmission from the temporal world, leaving
God out of account.
God does not work
by persuasion alone only because of a divine decision to do so, as in a voluntary self -
limitation, which could in principle be revoked from time to time.
To identify
God with one of the images that is thus produced is to allow the image to conceal the imageless One, and this means a
limitation by man of the fullness of his dialogue with
God.
However, Brunner does not regard the Christian theological doctrine of
God as interdicted
by this
limitation of the competence of reason.
If he takes seriously his
limitation of the source and norm of Christian thought to
God's self - disclosure in the encounter with Jesus Christ, then he must restrict the corpus of theology to a discussion of Jesus as Person and of what happens to man when faith is awakened in him
by the encounter.
They must rather admit that divine noncoercion is an unfortunate metaphysical
limitation, a
limitation which
God can attempt to overcome only
by attempting to persuade us to coerce in those situations where this would accomplish the desired ends.
Niebuhr considered the relation of agape to the struggle for justice to be as profound a revelation of the possibilities of
God's grace and the
limitations imposed
by man's sin as any facet of existence.
Niebuhr felt that the struggle for justice reveals the
limitations of sin and the possibilities of progress
by God's grace in society.
The authors of Christianity gave them a
god with no
limitations of any kind, so they can make up explanations and answers limited only
by their imaginations, and none of it has to be testable, verifiable, or consistent with any evidence.
In
God's letting - be of the world
by humble self -
limitation, there is established the probability that there will be a plurality of (relative) paths toward the one Absolute.
By becoming man, did the Son of
God undergo a creaturely
limitation in his divine powers?
But if
God's aim at beauty explains the
limitation by which individual occasions achieve definiteness, then in its continual adaptation to changing circumstances it must involve propositional feelings of each of the becoming occasions as realizing some peculiar satisfaction.
But if, as I hold,
God can function as principle of
limitation only
by entertaining a specific aim for each becoming occasion, that aim must take account of the actual situation in the world.
The claim is that, in order for the process of actualization to be possible at all, «antecedent
limitations» must be applied to the multiplicity of possibilities, and these are carried out in the «conceptual envisagement» of the total multiplicity of eternal objects, or ideal forms,
by God.
(And
God knows that he — along with the
limitations provided
by the other data from which a new entity originates — can bring about the repetition of certain abstract characteristics, or there would be no «order of nature.»)
Just maybe
God has set this human existence up in a way that all the world prays to a different Savior or «
God» not knowing who he is But all the prayers — whether they come from Muslims, Buddhists, Jews, and the diverse christain beliefs of Catholics, Protestants, Baptists, Evangelicals et al all end up going to the same Savior or
God — and when we get to the afterlife, the Savior —
God — Messiah — will reveal himself and greet us
by saying - you were all praying to me and did not know it was I becasue of your human
limitations
Given the natural
limitations of data recall, you are actually a bit of a dunce,
by the standards of the
gods.
In many ways, direct and indirect, this
limitation of the Hebrew
god to his own geographical demesne is revealed in the early documents of the Bible, as, for example, when Naaman, the Syrian, healed
by Elisha, carried «two mules» burden of earth» from Israel's land back to Damascus, that he might have, even in a foreign country, some of Yahweh's soil on which, standing, he could worship the
god of Israel.
The characteristic evangelical distinction was that
God's
limitation by the world was based upon
God's choice to be self - limited rather than upon the metaphysical necessity of the world.4
That no similar
limitation beset the Charles H. Mason Theological Seminary, established in 1979
by the Church of
God in Christ (largest of the dominantly Black classical Pentecostal bodies), can be attributed to the circumstances of its origin as part of Atlanta's Interdenominational Theological Center - a cluster of schools accredited
by the Association of Theological Schools.
In this unchanging form it must be indifferent to how this beauty is attained.16 But if
God's aim at beauty explains the
limitation by which individual occasions achieve definiteness, then in its continual adaptation to changing circumstances it must involve propositional feelings of each of the becoming occasions as realizing some peculiar satisfaction.
For Whitehead,
God first functioned as «the principle of
limitation,»... In Process and Reality, the eternal objects are organized together and given their respective «relational essences»
by the primordial or non-temporal activity of
God.
There is a question, however, about what
limitation Hartshorne believes is imposed
by the initial dependence of the argument on the idea of
God derived from the faith and the self - understanding of the believer.
Cobb says,»... the way in which
God functions as the principle of
limitation is
by ordering the infinite possibilities of the eternal objects according to principles of value.
If for any reason, the promotion is not capable of running as planned, including without
limitation, any suspected evidence of tampering or technological corruption or if any portion of the contest is compromised
by virus, bugs, worms or unauthorized human intervention, fraud, acts of
God, strikes, terrorist acts, criminal acts of third parties, an insufficient number of qualified entries, or any other causes beyond Vital Essentials ®» control which, in Vital Essentials ®» sole opinion, corrupts, threatens or impairs the administration, security, fairness, integrity, or proper conduct of the promotion, Vital Essentials ® reserves the right to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend the drawing at their sole discretion.
To the maximum extent permitted
by applicable law, Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate LLC and its affiliates and its and their officers, directors, employees, shareholders, FRANCHISEES or agents shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, punitive or consequential damages, or any other damages of any kind, including but not limited to loss of income, profits, goodwill, data, contracts, use of money, or loss or damage arising from or connected in any way to business interruption, whether in tort (including without
limitation negligence), contract or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with the use or inability to use the Web Site, content, User Content contained in or accessed through the Web Site, including without
limitation any damages caused
by or resulting from reliance
by a user on any information obtained from Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate LLC, or that result from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletion of files or email, errors, defects, viruses, delays in operation or transmission or any failure of performance, whether or not resulting from acts of
God, communications failure, theft, destruction or unauthorized access to Better Homes and Gardens REAL ESTATE LLCs» records, programs or services.