God establishes the limits of consequences of personal being, but persons choose the sequences insofar as they choose at all.
Not exact matches
And yet, when the gifted musician / author Jeremy Begbie reviewed art historian Dan Siedell's book
God in the Gallery in the current issue of Image, Begbie appeared - ever so subtly - to take issue that Dan Siedell, in a book about art,
limited himself to «one particular current within the Nicene river, the Eastern Orthodox tradition... and the council of Niceae (787 CE), the conference which
established the orthodoxy of icons.»
Stoeger seems to
limit the manifestation of
God to the operation of divinely
established natural laws whilst excluding effects transcending the order of that created nature, explicable only by the direct, supernatural action of
God.
Authors in this camp clearly
establish the view that the power of evil is
limited, and that the power of good (or
God) is the absolute authority which sets the
limits.
On the other hand,
God must so act in the interests of both the self and all others as thereby to
establish the cosmic order of natural law that sets the optimal
limits of all other action, where by «optimal
limits» I mean
limits such that, were they to be set otherwise than they are, the ratio between opportunities for good and risks of evil would be less rather than more favorable than it in fact is.
God has
established one
limit only to abuses.
But
God scatters them,
establishing distinct nations (confusing their tongues) as the means to sustain humanity in a condition of real but
limited solidarity until the time appointed by
God for our restoration to Eden's happy harmony.